Peter J Barban
Well-Known Member
- Mar 29, 2016
- 1,473
- 972
- 63
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
The main flaw of this argument is assuming that there is something wrong/bad/evil with Hell. Hell is actually right/good/holy. God is good, righteous, and holy, thus everything that God creates is good, therefor Hell is good too.Marilyn McCord Adams, who was a philosopher and Episcopal priest, developed an argument to refute ECT (eternal conscious torment). Her argument is candidly appropriated from the logical problem of evil by J.L. Mackie.
She begins with two premises
G: God exists, and is essentially omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good
H: Some created persons will be consigned to hell forever
The argument:
1. If God existed and were omnipotent, then God would be able to avoid H
2. If God existed and were omniscient, then God would know how to avoid H
3. If God existed and were perfectly good, then God would want to avoid H
Conclusion: If G; then not-H
(If God exists, and is essentially omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good; then it is not the case that some created persons will be consigned to hell forever)
This is my first time seeing this argument, so I am curious what y'all think.
https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/campu...l-A-Problem-of-Evil-for-Christians-pslyys.pdf
Marilyn McCord Adams - Wikipedia
God is love and Hell's loving purpose is to torment the enemies of God.
Rejecting the God-created Hell puts you on the opposite of good.
Upvote
0