No I don't think it's funny, these are peoples lives that are being ruined because of some crazy brain numbing belief.Pretty hilarious, isn't it?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No I don't think it's funny, these are peoples lives that are being ruined because of some crazy brain numbing belief.Pretty hilarious, isn't it?
If evolution happened....we would see transitional fossils all over the place.
Frogs and salamanders are separate kinds. They are not related.
Considering there are no transitional fossils...
But, just for fun...who evolved into who...that is, who is further down on the tree of life?
Incorrect. Frogs and salamanders are both members of Batrachia. They are related via common ancestry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batrachia
Oh really? Is this skull "fully ape" or "fully human"?
View attachment 167500
I guess you don't realize that your gotcha hypothetical has an answer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lissamphibia
Nothing you post has anything to do with science. Why do you post?That has nothing to do with frogs or salamanders. Why did you post it?
Why waste your time being so belligerent? What do you hope to accomplish by insulting people? Don't just emptily claim that people are wrong, give reason for it, and if you want people to care about what you say, then attempt to be polite when you do it.What complete and utter nonsense, the minute before you die you will still believe they are coming and you will still be waiting.
I wouldn't say it was arrogant. Personally, I think calling anyone stupid for having a different perspective on religious matters is being needlessly antagonizing. It would certainly be ignorant to claim that the reason why someone is not a believer is because they are "too smart" for it. Plenty of modern geniuses are theists, as are plenty of morons. Same goes for atheists. Being intelligent in and of itself does not distinguish the groups from each other.So, I'm arrogant to state that people who believe they are too smart, educated and intelligent, to believe Gods' word, as it is stated, are arrogant.
I think that's consol.Why waste your time being so belligerent? What do you hope to accomplish by insulting people? Don't just emptily claim that people are wrong, give reason for it, and if you want people to care about what you say, then attempt to be polite when you do it.
I cringe when I read posts like this.
My statement still stands. And given my long-standing... problem, with consol, this does not deter me. Salvation from needless internet hate exists for all!I think that's consol.
I've seen worse.My statement still stands. And given my long-standing... problem, with consol, this does not deter me. Salvation from needless internet hate exists for all!
I'm sure you have; so have I. I retain my right to respond disapprovingly to it.I've seen worse.
I agree, calling anyone stupid is antagonizing. However, many times on forums and threads posters are labeled as the less intelligent people of the populous due to their belief in YEC.I wouldn't say it was arrogant. Personally, I think calling anyone stupid for having a different perspective on religious matters is being needlessly antagonizing. It would certainly be ignorant to claim that the reason why someone is not a believer is because they are "too smart" for it. Plenty of modern geniuses are theists, as are plenty of morons. Same goes for atheists. Being intelligent in and of itself does not distinguish the groups from each other.
Let me ask you,Jacksbratt, I have to tell you and several others here that your cases simply do not impress me, due to the fact they present only inflammatory rhetoric and offer no solid rebuttals to science of anything else.
It does not follow at all that if evolution is true, we'd find transitional fossils all over the place. Fact is, transitional fossils have been found. I don' t know the frequency, however. But if it should prove relatively low, I would take that as normal for them. Thing is, these are in-betweeners, and the lesson has been that in-betweeners are not well adapted and so may soon be extinguished. Actually, you can see that happening in our modern technology, where in-betweeners are often dropped for being quite inefficient.