• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Man and dinosaur coexisting

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
If evolution happened....we would see transitional fossils all over the place.

Really? Why would we expect to find fossils period, much less transitional fossils (in the dictionary sense) "all over the place"? Do you even understand how fossilization happens and why it doesn't happen very often, even less so in particular environments?
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Considering there are no transitional fossils...

Oh really? Is this skull "fully ape" or "fully human"?
Turkana Profiles.jpg


But, just for fun...who evolved into who...that is, who is further down on the tree of life?

I guess you don't realize that your gotcha hypothetical has an answer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lissamphibia
 
Upvote 0

-57

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2015
8,701
1,957
✟77,658.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

-57

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2015
8,701
1,957
✟77,658.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

Hoghead1

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2015
4,911
741
78
✟8,968.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
It does not follow at all that if evolution is true, we'd find transitional fossils all over the place. Fact is, transitional fossils have been found. I don' t know the frequency, however. But if it should prove relatively low, I would take that as normal for them. Thing is, these are in-betweeners, and the lesson has been that in-betweeners are not well adapted and so may soon be extinguished. Actually, you can see that happening in our modern technology, where in-betweeners are often dropped for being quite inefficient.
 
Upvote 0

Hoghead1

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2015
4,911
741
78
✟8,968.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Transitional organisms have been hard to think up beforehand. The picture we may draw is often not how nature sees it. Some old-timers, for instance, depicted the missing link as literally looking someone half man and half gorilla. However, it does not work out that way in nature, as the transitional fossils of humans do not at all look that way.
 
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
What complete and utter nonsense, the minute before you die you will still believe they are coming and you will still be waiting.
Why waste your time being so belligerent? What do you hope to accomplish by insulting people? Don't just emptily claim that people are wrong, give reason for it, and if you want people to care about what you say, then attempt to be polite when you do it.

I cringe when I read posts like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Butterfly99
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
So, I'm arrogant to state that people who believe they are too smart, educated and intelligent, to believe Gods' word, as it is stated, are arrogant.
I wouldn't say it was arrogant. Personally, I think calling anyone stupid for having a different perspective on religious matters is being needlessly antagonizing. It would certainly be ignorant to claim that the reason why someone is not a believer is because they are "too smart" for it. Plenty of modern geniuses are theists, as are plenty of morons. Same goes for atheists. Being intelligent in and of itself does not distinguish the groups from each other.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,754
52,544
Guam
✟5,134,579.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why waste your time being so belligerent? What do you hope to accomplish by insulting people? Don't just emptily claim that people are wrong, give reason for it, and if you want people to care about what you say, then attempt to be polite when you do it.

I cringe when I read posts like this.
I think that's consol.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,754
52,544
Guam
✟5,134,579.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
My statement still stands. And given my long-standing... problem, with consol, this does not deter me. Salvation from needless internet hate exists for all!
I've seen worse.
 
Upvote 0

JacksBratt

Searching for Truth
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
16,294
6,495
63
✟596,843.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I wouldn't say it was arrogant. Personally, I think calling anyone stupid for having a different perspective on religious matters is being needlessly antagonizing. It would certainly be ignorant to claim that the reason why someone is not a believer is because they are "too smart" for it. Plenty of modern geniuses are theists, as are plenty of morons. Same goes for atheists. Being intelligent in and of itself does not distinguish the groups from each other.
I agree, calling anyone stupid is antagonizing. However, many times on forums and threads posters are labeled as the less intelligent people of the populous due to their belief in YEC.

I would like to clarify that I did not say that they are not a believer because they are too smart for it. I stated that they consider themselves too smart to fall for it. They are so proud of all their education that they will not believe the simple text of ancient men. Many times I have been told that if I had the "education" or knew all the facts that I would not believe or that I would be a fool to believe in YEC.

This is why it is the simpler people, not necessarily the less intelligent but the simpler people who find it easier to grasp the truth of the gospel and the biblical history as it is written. They have the ability to approach it from a position of "teach me" not...."Bah, I've been taught and I know".

Call it arrogance, call it pride.... whatever. Their attitude is their stumbling block and their blinders.
 
Upvote 0

JacksBratt

Searching for Truth
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
16,294
6,495
63
✟596,843.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Jacksbratt, I have to tell you and several others here that your cases simply do not impress me, due to the fact they present only inflammatory rhetoric and offer no solid rebuttals to science of anything else.
Let me ask you,

Does Science have an answer for everything? Is it possible that there are factors, forces, principles, objects, and actions that science has no way of understanding, measuring, proving or disproving?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

JacksBratt

Searching for Truth
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
16,294
6,495
63
✟596,843.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
It does not follow at all that if evolution is true, we'd find transitional fossils all over the place. Fact is, transitional fossils have been found. I don' t know the frequency, however. But if it should prove relatively low, I would take that as normal for them. Thing is, these are in-betweeners, and the lesson has been that in-betweeners are not well adapted and so may soon be extinguished. Actually, you can see that happening in our modern technology, where in-betweeners are often dropped for being quite inefficient.

The way I see it is... if evolution is true and it took place over billions of years and each organism has a link to the original organism(even several original organisms) there would have to be infinite transitional species, kinds and organisms. Just to go from say a lizard to a bird.... there should be innumerable fossils of gradual change for just one simple macro evolutionary step. In order to account for the hundreds of different kinds of animals we have today and the ones that have become extinct for various reasons, there would have to be thousands upon thousands of fossils of minute changes.
 
Upvote 0