You guys seem to forget the people in the bible that were priveledged to this presence of being with God, like adam and eve. Adam and eve sinned and thus we have also and we have had Jesus in our midst who was God. You can not say the angels have had something we havent.
Yes, we can. Here's why:
1). Every fallen angel was in heaven with God beholding Him in His full glory and majesty. Not even Adam and Eve experienced God this way. The Bible tells us that no living man has seen God at anytime (
Jn. 1:18), which is to say that no man has seen God as He is in all His brilliant power and holiness. Angels have, however.
2). Jesus did not reveal his true nature except to a few - and those few didn't fully comprehend who he was until after his resurrection and ascension into heaven. He was God in the flesh, by willful choice having set aside the full, divine glory that was his as Creator. No one, except perhaps those disciples who saw Christ briefly transfigured, had any clear idea of the divine nature of the person called Jesus. None of them experienced Christ as the angels do.
3). Angels, as far as the record of Scripture tells us, are a higher order creature than humans (
Heb. 2:7). They are not solely corporeal, they are far more powerful than humans, and they are not dependent as we are upon food, water, etc., to live.
All of these things have an important bearing upon why the angels who fell from heaven (or any angel, for that matter) cannot be appropriately compared in their condition to humans.
You may say the Bible chooses not to tell us why they are going to hell, but yet the bible cares to show they are going to hell, so if it wants to say that, it should provide a basis for that or not say it at all, because then God is showing them no love. Does God love Satan?
That God has judged and condemned Satan and his fallen angels to hell for all eternity doesn't mean that God
never loved them. In fact, what makes them so positively or justly condemned is that they existed in unobstructed and undiminished fellowship to a loving, holy God and
still rose up in rebellion toward Him. I think God once loved Satan as He does any of us, but Satan with full, unadulterated knowledge of God has rejected Him completely and utterly. Satan now is absolutely devoted to evil, beyond redemption by his own choosing. In such a condition, Satan can be only an object of God's wrath.
If I created something and my other creation was interferring and messing things up for everyone else, I would get rid of it.
Trying to assess an infinite, perfect God by your finite, comparatively ignorant standards has some very obvious problems, don't you think?
God should do the same with Satan. Isn't that why moses and his ppl killed entire races? God told them to kill them because either they did wrong or whatever, but God himself does not do the same that He commands his ppl and do away with Satan. Oh, I am sorry he said he would, but only in the end. How lame.
Why must your timing be God's? Why is it "lame" when God doesn't do what you think He should do?
I think the fact that I would do different and be done with Satan shows that I am more moral than God. Oh, I know that may sound difficult, but prove to me that I am wrong.
Actually, all it does is prove that you and God do things differently. You are making the claim that you are more moral than God so it falls to
you to prove that you are right.
Peace.