Marvin Knox
Senior Veteran
The point of judgment day is for everyone to answer for what they have done in their life whether good or bad.So, let's think about this for a minute. Think about it.
So, if God predestines everything in our lives, than what is the point of Judgement Day at all?
Man has free will. Believing in predestination does not teach otherwise.Why would God even judge a creation that has no choice or free will at all.
Predestination is perfectly compatible with free will. (We could delve deeply now into exactly how free the will of fallen man is. But then – there have been entire books written about that – haven’t there?)
In the simple sense of the term “free will” (where we will stay for now) – men have free will to do whatever their human nature allows them to do.
When you or anyone else says that men have no choice in what they do – they are wrong. Any Calvinist who goes that far without nuancing what he means is wrong. Any non-Calvinist who says that men must be robots or puppets or some such thing if everything they do is predestined to happen is wrong – plain and simple. They just haven’t thought the concept of predestination through at all it appears to me.
Without a long debate whether or not He did – if I said that God predestined a great earthquake to take place in the tribulation period that was so strong as to remove every island from it’s place, likely no one here would say that He would have to change the laws of nature and geology to accomplish what He predestined to occur. Nature could still act in accordance with the laws that God set in place when He created the earth and still do exactly what God determined to happen.
If I said that God predestined that the very infallible and inerrant Word of God be written and preserved for us in the gospel age by fallible men just like us – likely no one here would say that God would have to do away with the desires and natures of men and treat them like robots and puppets to accomplish what He predestined to occur. We all believe that the writers of the scriptures wrote what they wanted to write of their own free will and in their own style and words – even as God accomplished exactly what He had predestined to be written.
But only in this very select area of what we call “soteriolgy” it seems – people here are quick to say that if God predestined our actions to happen before time, He would have to take away our desires and free will and treat us like robots and puppets to bring to past exactly what He predestined to take place in time.
I would suggest to all here that your indignation and claims of robotics and puppetry is very select indeed. In this case – your sensibilities come into play because you believe that God would have to be unfair to predestine all salvation occurrences and lack thereof. Your emotional objections over predestination are completely arbitrary in what areas you become indignant about.
It would be humorous to watch the recognized rules of logic be thrown out the window just because of personal emotional attachments to certain ideas. That is – it would be humorous if the consequences to our determining sound systematic theology were not so grave.
According to what we are shown in the Word of God - the predestination by God of all things that happen in His creation is completely compatible with the free choices of His creatures.
There is no logical reason to say that it must be otherwise.
What is more the very nature of God and the nature of His creation and God’s omnipresent and providential control over that creation according to what the Bible clearly teaches --- absolutely demand that we believe that God has predestined everything that happens in His creation and that He is actively working to bring it all to past..
There are two groups exactly like that. They are all sinners under the curse of God and under His wrath even as they live this life on earth.God could choose the believers and then there would be two groups of people on earth, exactly alike in every way except that some were chosen and some were not.
God reserves the right to choose from the same lump of clay vessels for mercy and vessels for wrath. One thing it is impossible to miss in that concept is that the “lump” is sinful without exception..
Some of the clay are recipients of the grace of God that brings them to salvation in spite of their guilt in order that He can display His mercy and grace in the ages to come.
Others, of the same guilty fallen nature as these, God passes by for the glory of the display of His justice and wrath in the ages to come.
You and I might wish it was otherwise. But then - from our vantage point and clouded in our understanding of such things by sin as we are – we really should leave the holiness of God to Him to defend and not twist doctrine to protect it.
That’s exactly what many evangelicals do IMO – even most of evangelicals.
Last edited:
Upvote
0