I said this:
" Paul clearly indicated it in
Romans 7, a chapter that it seems you're totally unwilling to face."
But if your interpretation is true, then Paul contradicted himself when he said he was sold under sin in Romans 7:14 and yet he was free from sin in Romans 8:2.
Then please show HOW. Just making such a statement doesn't prove anything. Prove your claim.
Again, this does not mean what you think it says. It cannot mean to say that we will have sin always in our life because 1 John 2:4 refutes such a notion. For he that does not keep his commandments and says he knows him is a liar and the truth is not in him.
You really aren't following what others are saying, are you? I NEVER said "always have sin in our life". My point has been clear and consistent: when the believer spiritually grows in grace, they will sin less. That's not "sin always in our life".
No it's not. Sin has always been a loss of separation between God and man (Which began for man with his one act of disobedience in the Garden of Eden).
Unbelievers are separated from God spiritually. Believers are separated from God in fellowship.
No. The Bible does not say future sin is paid for.
Thos who have actually read the Bible and understand it know better. Hebrews says that Christ's sacrifice was for sin once for all.
Heb 7:27 - who does not need daily, like those high priests, to offer up sacrifices, first for His own sins and then for the sins of the people, because
this He did once for all when He offered upHimself.
Rom 6:10 - For the death that He died,
He died to sin once for all; but the life that He lives, He lives to God.
Heb 10:10 - By this will we have been sanctified
through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.
1 Pet 3:18 - For
Christ also died for sins once for all, the just for the unjust, so that He might bring us to God, having been put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit;
Sorry I couldn't come up with some parable for you, but the Scripture is clear enough for me and many others.
On the contrary, Hebrews 10:26 says if we willfully sin after having received the knowledge of the truth, there remains no more sacrifice for sin.
Correct. Because Christ already died for sins once for all. He is the ultimate and final sacrifice. The verse is a repeat of v.18 - Now where there is forgiveness of these things, there is no longer any offering for sin.
Consider this: if Christ didn't die for all sins, past, present and future, then we have to ultimately save ourselves since He didn't complete the work of providing salvation.
1 John 1:9 says we have to confess sin in order to be forgiven of sin.
What is the theme of ch 1? Fellowship, not relationship. The chapter is to believers, who are already saved.
1 John 1:7 says we have to walk in the light as he is in the light in order for the blood of Jesus to cleanse us from all sin.
Which is accomplished through confession for fellowship.
Proverbs 28:13 says we have to confess and forsake sin in order to have mercy. So no. You are wrong.
You have failed to prove how this verse supports your theory.
You are the one who is failing to see what the Scriptures are plainly saying. If what you say is true, then the Pharisees should have been saved. But Jesus said they were hypocrites and they lived a hypocrital and sinful life.
You are so confused. Of course they weren't saved. They thought they could earn eternal life by keeping the law. Which they couldn't.
And you do not understand what Romans 6 says. Paul clearly says shall we continue in sin so that grace may abound? Paul's answer to that question is "God forbid."
I agree. And this verse still does not support your theory.
He then says yield yourselves to whom ye obey.
The more we yield to the Spirit, the LESS we sin.
No. I have proved it very clearly by God's Word. You are simply not wanting to see what the Scriptures plainly say. 1 Peter 4:1, Galatians 5:24, and many others refute your belief. Jesus said to two people to: "sin no more."
I've refuted those verses. They don't occur in the original manuscripts.
So Jesus's parables and other analogies are a deception?
What a ridiculous question. Seriously? Jesus NEVER suggested His disciples speak in parables. Neither did Paul.
I have been talking against Calvinism and OSAS for many years now. Yes, you do not believe in Calvinism, but that is where OSAS comes from.
Wrong. It comes from the Bible. As been proven and you've rejected.
But if a believer makes excuses for sin by saying they will forever sin, then they are believing in a sin and still be saved doctrine (Which is wrong).
Who on this thread ever said they "will sin forever"? No one. So stop making claims that no one says. I've been clear about ceasing sin when we obtain a resurrection body. And there will be no sin in heaven.
You yourself said it is impossible for a beleiver to stop sinning.
Again, you keep trying to paint a very false picture that believers constantly sin. Stop it. It's impossible for believers to achieve sinless perfection.
So this gives the believer the green light to sin on occasion.
Don't be ridiculous. No one has a green light, nor a license. We do have sin natures, that do sin.
Yes, you believe a believer should strive to live holy and to repent of sin, etc. But that doesn't mean anything if one thinks they will just forever sin in this life. It's making an allowance for evil. It is having the wrong attitude towards sin.
You've got the wrong attitude about a lot of doctrine.
Which is teaching man to sin.
When did man need to be taught to sin?? That is laughable.