• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Let's Talk About Hell (2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

LutheranMafia

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2008
2,403
76
58
✟2,937.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Would you be angry if the divinity of Jesus Christ was said to be unorthodox and only allowed to be discussed in UT? How about the trinity?
No, I wouldn't be angry.

If you believed Jesus was born of a virgin, but anytime you said so in GT they modded your post and sent the thread to UT, you would also be angry.
I believe in reincarnation and I believe that the Bible makes several references to reincarnation. I find it frustrating that it is an orthodox Jewish belief and yet not an orthodox Christian belief. But it doesn't make me angry. That is just the way it is and I have to accept it. I think that when Christ returns people will start to remember their own previous incarnations and then there will be nothing to argue about. Until then I just have to bide my time and be content with my own beliefs and try to respect other people's beliefs, although I clearly have a hard time with that sometimes. But when I do have a hard time with it I take it as a message to myself to simply stop arguing with the person that is making me feel so frustrated. I don't take it as a sign that I need to seek out people that frustrate me more vigorously.

The Bible (Romans 6:23) specifically and clearly says that the wages of sin is death NOT eternal torment, so if any viewpoint should be only allowed to be discussed in UT, it should be the POV that there is eternal torment in hell for sinners.
You don't understand because you don't believe in an afterlife, so when it says death you read something very different into it than what someone who believes in an afterlife does. Death is not an end, and for people who understand this Romans 6:23 reads very differently than it does to you who thinks that death is an absolute end.

For other people the story of Lazarus and the rich man is not a symbolic parable refering to purely fanciful ideas, it is a concrete reality. There is also Luke 23:43 which clearly speaks of an afterlife, as well as 1 Samuel 28. Then there is all the OT rererences to bans on speaking to the dead, which would not be the case if the dead could not be talked to.

So the Bible gives a lot of evidence for an afterlife and it shouldn't be surprising to you that the orthodox view on death and Romans 6:23 is different from your own. It all boils down to whether or not belief in an afterlife is orthodox, which it clearly is.
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟44,054.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
OK, I see your point.

Conditional Immortality is Unorthodox, although it is completely grounded in scripture.

Therefore it the Orthodox who are in error concerning the scriptures. What a weird statement that is, considering the definition of orthodox, Conforming to what is accepted as right or true.

Oh well, that's not My problem.
 
Upvote 0

LutheranMafia

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2008
2,403
76
58
✟2,937.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
OK, I see your point.

Conditional Immortality is Unorthodox, although it is completely grounded in scripture.
It is not grounded in scripture, it is grounded in a very disbelief in the afterlife, which you go through all sorts of contortions to explain away.

Therefore it the Orthodox who are in error concerning the scriptures. What a weird statement that is, considering the definition of orthodox, Conforming to what is accepted as right or true.
No they aren't my friend. It is not what Jesus taught and it is based on an essentially atheistic belief that death is an end.
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟44,054.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It is not grounded in scripture, it is grounded in a very disbelief in the afterlife, which you go through all sorts of contortions to explain away.


No they aren't my friend. It is not what Jesus taught and it is based on an essentially atheistic belief that death is an end.

Don't you also believe that death is the end of life and the resurrection is the end of death? When Joseph of Aramathea took Jesus down from the cross was Jesus alive or was He dead? When we are resurrected from our graves will we be alive or dead? When Jesus was resurrected, was He alive or dead? When we are in our graves are we buried alive or dead? When we are alive again after the resurrection isn't that life to be considered "afterlife" considering that it is "after" this life?

Atheistic comes from 2 greek words: A, a prefix meaning not; and θεός, which means god. So an atheist is a person that believes there is no god. My belief that God will raise us up from death on the last day is no more atheistic than your belief that living spirits of the dead will go to Hades when they die.
 
Upvote 0

Soulgazer

Christian Gnostic
Feb 24, 2011
3,748
90
Visit site
✟34,403.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It is not grounded in scripture, it is grounded in a very disbelief in the afterlife, which you go through all sorts of contortions to explain away.


No they aren't my friend. It is not what Jesus taught and it is based on an essentially atheistic belief that death is an end.
Wow.... :(
 
Upvote 0

Soulgazer

Christian Gnostic
Feb 24, 2011
3,748
90
Visit site
✟34,403.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The thread is just as active here as it was on GT, except you have more people agreeing with you here. I have trouble keeping up with the volume of messages and replies here.

Why do you want to be around people that don't agree with you and don't want to hear your point of view at all? Just because someone labels this forum a dumpster doesn't mean it is. A lot of people in the denominational forums think of GT as a dumpster.
Ffffft. If you want an intelligent conversation, don't get angry you choose a forum that believes in talking snakes. ;)
 
Upvote 0

LutheranMafia

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2008
2,403
76
58
✟2,937.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Don't you also believe that death is the end of life
Physical life, not spiritual life.

and the resurrection is the end of death?
No, I don't believe this at all.

When Joseph of Aramathea took Jesus down from the cross was Jesus alive or was He dead?
His spirit went to paradise and then to Sheol for three days where Jesus preached to the souls in Sheol.

When we are resurrected from our graves will we be alive or dead?
I personally have an entirely unorthdox view of resurrection which you wouldn't even begin to understand because I've never had a chance to even attempt at explaining. However, the resurrection is one of the least well defined concepts in all of the Bible.

When Jesus was resurrected, was He alive or dead?
He was a alive as a spiritual body with physicality. Just as Corinthians 15:44 describes.

When we are in our graves are we buried alive or dead?
The spirit and soul do not die with the phsysical body. We have three parts, you whole confusion comes from trying to generalize everything to one body rather than 3. We have three parts, not just one, just as God has three parts.

When we are alive again after the resurrection isn't that life to be considered "afterlife" considering that it is "after" this life?
No, that is not an afterlife. That well be a completely altered state of existence where we will be able to teleport at will and do all sorts of things that are only possible with a spirit body, which defy comprehension now.
 
Upvote 0

LutheranMafia

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2008
2,403
76
58
✟2,937.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Atheistic comes from 2 greek words: A, a prefix meaning not; and θεός, which means god. So an atheist is a person that believes there is no god. My belief that God will raise us up from death on the last day is no more atheistic than your belief that living spirits of the dead will go to Hades when they die.
You deny the existence of an afterlife because you do not see God as being in truly three parts and our reflection of those three parts.
 
Upvote 0

LutheranMafia

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2008
2,403
76
58
✟2,937.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
I know, right?
See, only here are you going to get people agreeing with you. So like I said, I don't see why you are upset about this thread being here. If this thread were in GT you would be infuriated by all the people agreeing with me. (BTW, I just recently got reps from one of the mods for my statements about us having three parts just like God).
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟44,054.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
[FONT=times new roman, new york, times, serif]I addressed this with Timothew earlier, but here are some references I've never given before because I suspect that you are not fanatically convinced against an afterlife the way Timothew is:[/FONT]

Would you stop with the "timothew doesn't believe in an afterlife stuff"?
I've already told you many times that I do believe in an afterlife, a life after this life. My version of the afterlife merely includes Jesus and the Resurrection.

Atheists don't believe in an afterlife either. Same same.
Who cares what atheists believe? I believe in Christ, I believe in His resurrection, I believe in Him to resurrect us. I am at a complete loss to see how you define this faith of mine as "atheistic."
Enoch walked faithfully with God; then he was no more, because God took him away.
[FONT=times new roman, new york, times, serif]Genesis 5:24[/FONT]
[FONT=times new roman, new york, times, serif]This is the first reference to an afterlife. I challenge anyone to argue that Genesis 5:24 refers to Enoch ceasing to exit.[/FONT]

Read the words: "then he was no more". Doesn't this refer to Enoch ceasing to exist? In plain english, he died. If he was still alive the words would have said "and then he was some more". :p
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟44,054.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
See, only here are you going to get people agreeing with you. So like I said, I don't see why you are upset about this thread being here. If this thread were in GT you would be infuriated by all the people agreeing with me. (BTW, I just recently got reps from one of the mods for my statements about us having three parts just like God).

I kinda like it when people disagree with me. It make them look foolish. ;)
 
Upvote 0

Hillsage

One 4 Him & Him 4 all
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2009
5,261
1,768
The land of OZ
✟368,280.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Don't you also believe that death is the end of life and the resurrection is the end of death?
I thought you told me the answer to that question was NO. Jesus would raise you from the dead and then kill you again after judging you...right?

When we are in our graves are we buried alive or dead? When we are alive again after the resurrection isn't that life to be considered "afterlife" considering that it is "after" this life?
I believe that our spirit is ever alive and returns to God, our soul goes to sleep awaiting judgment for works done and the flesh is dead from sins and decays or perishes. :idea:
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟44,054.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I thought you told me the answer to that question was NO. Jesus would raise you from the dead and then kill you again after judging you...right?

No, I meant that resurrection is the end of death for those who receive eternal life from God. For those who do not receive eternal life, what else is there? What is the state of those who do not receive life? the condition of not having life is called death.

I believe that our spirit is ever alive and returns to God, our soul goes to sleep awaiting judgment for works done and the flesh is dead from sins and decays or perishes.
idea.gif
Is there scripture backing this belief?
 
Upvote 0

Soulgazer

Christian Gnostic
Feb 24, 2011
3,748
90
Visit site
✟34,403.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Atheists don't believe in an afterlife either. Same same. Taking Romans 6:23 to mean that there is no eternal torment is just an extension of this quintessentially atheistic disbelief in an afterlife.
Sorry, but I believe in the dissolution theory also. There is life and there is death. If you live forever, that is everlasting life; all else is death. No consciousness, no today, yesterdays or tomorrows. When the lights go out, the room goes dark. Death is eternal. There is no death in the afterlife, just as there is no life in death. If you don't resurrect in spirit while your body is alive, when your body dies, it's boom, out go the lights.

I am going to say that I don't believe in God. I know there is a God, because I have followed the steps my forebears left behind and stood in His presence, as He has stood within me. Our Father is pure perfect love; He didn't directly create this disastrous mudball we live on, or the monkey suits we are wearing, but we carry His Divine seed of potentiality within us anyway, because He loves us enough to try and rescue us from our own devices. He knows you are already being tortured---He won't add even a microsecond to it. He wants you to live, but if you can't live, He will grant you the mercy of death.
 
Upvote 0

gort

pedantric
Sep 18, 2003
10,451
194
71
Visit site
✟41,892.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Most? Most people only parrot what they have been told by churchianity. "Most" is hardly a qualifier for ascertaining factual data. The Apocalyptic sect were Messianic Jews still looking for Jesus to return immediately and give the spiritual Babylon of Rome a trouncing; it was not written by the same hand as the Gospel that came out of the naasene Gnostic sect(it happens to be my favorite Gospel also).

.

Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show unto his servants, even the things which must shortly come to pass: and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John;
Rev 1:2 who bare witness of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, even of all things that he saw.
Rev 1:3 Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of the prophecy, and keep the things that are written therein: for the time is at hand.


I've put in bold the word that says prophecy. As it's prophecy, it's not the imagery of a man angry at the destruction of his country, or comparable to Inglorious Basterds, it's prophecy. It's a book that contains witness of revelation of things to come from God to John.


"Most" is hardly a qualifier for ascertaining factual data.

I certainly agree with this. Hardly anyone is willing to do the work but would rather take, for instance, what Tacitus had to say about the destruction of Jerusalem as the gospel truth. Forget about the part that he was living in Italy at the time with his mum and pops eating toast and drinking hot cocoa and 14 years old at the time.

As it is written and says to be prophecy and I might add, with the strict warning of what happens when one changes said prophecy, it is highly irrational to think that the author is going to impinge his opinion or fictional writing abilities into such a work.

Ascertaining factual data also requires rationality. If most credible historians are in unison with their data then it is reasonable to ascertain they are correct. In this case, John the gospel writer who was imprisoned on the island of Patmos under the reign of Domitian in 95 is reasonable to accept as the writer.

On the other hand, if it is the few who are the qualifier for ascertaining factual data, then such data must be very convincing. And I stress "very convincing".
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟55,673.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
What the hell? What's been proven and upon what logic has it been proven? The way you worded that almost sounds like you're more focused on 'winning' than actually proving your point. Point out the parts of my post or whatever post you're looking at that proves eternal hell.

It says Satan, the beast, and the false prophet are to be tortured forever and ever if you take it literally. It then says that the grave and death are to be cast into hell as well. What happens to the grave and death, you could look at it as them being tortured forever and ever as well (though it specifically says this for satan and co. but not the grave) or you could look at it as them being wiped out.

It also puts a kink in the eternal hellfire for unbelievers as it mentions that those who take the mark of the beast would be subject to this. That significantly limits who will and will not be sent to this so called eternal hellfire. Why those people in particular? What happens to those ages ago who did not believe in God or even attempt to seek Him out?

Of course, this is the same book talking about how God will pluck the wicked up and mushing the of their blood like wine in a winepress so I would take what it says with a grain of salt.

Now its your turn. What about Jeremiah 7 and Eternal hellfire torture not being preached in the Torah? Why would God not warn Adam and Eve about something this serious? He promises them that they would surely die, not that they would surely be endanger of eternal punishment or anything of the sort.

is that how we are to interpret the bible, "with a grain of salt"?

thats hardly an answer. death and hell are cast into the lake of fire, this is to mean that the two compartments of abrahams bosom and the grave are to be caste into hell. Anyone in those categories will be caste into hell. Thats pretty straightforward no need to allegorize unnecessarily

here are some commentaries to back up the claim

Bible Knowledge Commentary
20:14-15. Following the great white throne judgment death and hades were thrown into the lake of fire. The lake of fire is the second death, the final destination of the wicked. The doctrine of eternal punishment has always been a problem to Christians who enjoy the grace of God and salvation in Christ. The Bible is clear, however, that the punishment of the wicked is eternal. This is confirmed in verse 10, where the beast and the false prophet are still in the lake of fire after the thousand years of Christ’s millennial reign. Though the wicked dead will receive resurrection bodies, they will be quite unlike the resurrection bodies of the saints. The former people will continue to be sinful but will be indestructible and will exist forever in the lake of fire.
Walvoord, John F. ; Zuck, Roy B. ; Dallas Theological Seminary: The Bible Knowledge Commentary : An Exposition of the Scriptures. Wheaton, IL : Victor Books, 1983-c1985, S. 2:983

J Vernon McGee
You will notice that in my translation I have changed “death and hell were cast into the lake of fire” to “death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire.” Sheol or hades (translated hell in the New Testament) is the place of the unseen dead and is divided into two compartments: paradise and the place of torment (see Luke 16:19–31). Paradise was emptied when Christ took the Old Testament believers with Him at His ascension. “Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men. (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth? He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things)” (Eph. 4:8–10). Christ did two things: He gave gifts to men down here, but He also took with Him to heaven those Old Testament saints who had died and were in the place called paradise. But the place of torment will deliver up the lost at the judgment at the Great White Throne. All who stand at this judgment are lost, and we are told that they are cast into the lake of fire, which is the second death. The Lord also called it “outer darkness.” We believe that this is symbolic of something worse than literal fire or outer darkness. It is eternal separation from God, for death means separation.
McGee, J. Vernon: Thru the Bible Commentary. electronic ed. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1997, c1981, S. 5:1061

13. Even the unsaved who have died on the seas, whose bodies have never been recovered, will not be exempt from this august tribunal (cf. Jn 5:28, 29). Death (used here for the grave) gives up the bodies; hell gives up the souls. No one is said to escape or enter eternal bliss. All the unsaved will suffer their eternal doom (cf. 20:6).
KJV Bible Commentary. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1997, c1994, S. 2714
 
Upvote 0

Soulgazer

Christian Gnostic
Feb 24, 2011
3,748
90
Visit site
✟34,403.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show unto his servants, even the things which must shortly come to pass: and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John;
Rev 1:2 who bare witness of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, even of all things that he saw.
Rev 1:3 Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of the prophecy, and keep the things that are written therein: for the time is at hand.


I've put in bold the word that says prophecy. As it's prophecy, it's not the imagery of a man angry at the destruction of his country, or comparable to Inglorious Basterds, it's prophecy. It's a book that contains witness of revelation of things to come from God to John.




I certainly agree with this. Hardly anyone is willing to do the work but would rather take, for instance, what Tacitus had to say about the destruction of Jerusalem as the gospel truth. Forget about the part that he was living in Italy at the time with his mum and pops eating toast and drinking hot cocoa and 14 years old at the time.

As it is written and says to be prophecy and I might add, with the strict warning of what happens when one changes said prophecy, it is highly irrational to think that the author is going to impinge his opinion or fictional writing abilities into such a work.

Ascertaining factual data also requires rationality. If most credible historians are in unison with their data then it is reasonable to ascertain they are correct. In this case, John the gospel writer who was imprisoned on the island of Patmos under the reign of Domitian in 95 is reasonable to accept as the writer.

On the other hand, if it is the few who are the qualifier for ascertaining factual data, then such data must be very convincing. And I stress "very convincing".
The operative word is credible. A credible scholar leaves his faith at the door and goes where the facts lead him. He or She usually holds doctorates from accredited universities, and holds a professors position. You will not find his/her serious works for sale at the corner bookshop; they are usually published by a scholastic publishing company, such as "Brill", and sell in the neighborhood of two hundred dollars. Serious students only will buy them. No Credible scholar at all attributes any Gospel at all except for Mark and Luke to the signatories, and that with plenty of caveats. I'm afraid your argument is all wet. Zero credible scholars attribute it to John of the Gospel. Zero.
As it is written and says to be prophecy and I might add, with the strict warning of what happens when one changes said prophecy, it is highly irrational to think that the author is going to impinge his opinion or fictional writing abilities into such a work.
The Q'uran says the same. They both have the same credence.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.