• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Let's suppose God did....

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives


Who said anything about that?

I said it's certainly within his power to make himself known to everyone, while providing proof it's actually him.

There's no logical contradiction there (like your example of a square circle), in fact, I don't imagine it'd be that hard to do.
 
Upvote 0

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I don't see a problem with it at all because I do not presume that everything must have a natural explanation. I don't question beg for naturalism.


We don't presume it either, however with a lack of any other reasonable alternatives, it's all we're left with for now.
 
Upvote 0

jayem

Naturalist
Jun 24, 2003
15,428
7,165
74
St. Louis, MO.
✟425,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
God can do anything logically possible. It is not logically possible for God to force someone to believe, trust, and love Him.

Well, would Saul of Tarsus have become a Christian had he not been struck blind for 3 days after Jesus appeared to him on the Damascus road? I guess strictly speaking, he already believed in God, though not in Jesus. But the principle is that your God does create circumstances which convinces someone to change their beliefs. Maybe you don't consider being blinded for 3 days as "force." But it certainly would direct one's mind.
 
Upvote 0

Freodin

Devout believer in a theologically different God
Mar 9, 2002
15,713
3,762
Germany, Bavaria, Middle Franconia
Visit site
✟260,281.00
Faith
Atheist
I would debate that. Round squares or married bachelors are definitional contradictions. There are other examples of logical contradictions.

But you would need to show why forcing (causing would perhaps be a less weighted term) belief and trust are logically impossible. I am willing to concede "love" here, though only because of the definitional problems with this concept.
 
Upvote 0

FrenchyBearpaw

Take time for granite.
Jun 13, 2011
3,252
79
✟4,283.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

Posting blind here,

but if the god of the bible were as powerful as it's adherents claim he is/was, I imagine he would have the ability to reveal himself to humanity in such a way as to remove all doubt, and the entirety of earth's population would have one, exact, specific religion, and not tens of thousands as is now. Further, if this god were benevolent, and most seem to suggest he is, I doubt there would be over half the world's population of children going to bed without food or potable water. I also imagine young children wouldn't get cancer, and I suppose you might see one or two amputees get new limbs every once in a while.

IMO

Namaste
 
Upvote 0
E

Elioenai26

Guest

Of course God can make Himself known to everyone while providing proof it is Him.

It is also possible people could reject this proof as not meeting their criteria for proof of God.
 
Upvote 0

Davian

fallible
May 30, 2011
14,100
1,181
West Coast of Canada
✟46,103.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
Of course God can make Himself known to everyone while providing proof it is Him.

It is also possible people could reject this proof as not meeting their criteria for proof of God.
What 'proof' are you referring to?
 
Upvote 0
E

Elioenai26

Guest

Your views are based on a misunderstanding of divine omnipotence. There are numerous things God cannot do.
 
Upvote 0

quatona

"God"? What do you mean??
May 15, 2005
37,512
4,302
✟190,302.00
Faith
Seeker
Of course God can make Himself known to everyone while providing proof it is Him.

It is also possible people could reject this proof as not meeting their criteria for proof of God.
What are the criteria for "proof" - as used in your statement above? Just so I know what I am to look for.
 
Upvote 0

Paradoxum

Liberty, Equality, Solidarity!
Sep 16, 2011
10,712
654
✟43,188.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats

I don't believe it, and I don't know why to believe it. I used to believe, and it might be nice if it were true. I often get nostalgic for my former faith, God, and worship, but I don't know why to believe in it. The world doesn't look to me like the God I once loved made it.

I don't see God anymore. I see nature and I see feeling creatures.

There ya go, Paradoxum. How can you not be convinced by that? He got Adam, Eve, the garden of Eden, and Jesus all in the same post. I am dissapointed that he did not expend the effort to work in Moses and the Great Flud.


Oh well...

But Jesus was physical and He is God... and there is evidence that He existed and was seen by many multitudes.

What is the evidence? To be honest I still wonder about the apparent case for the resurrection.


I haven't seen Jesus, and would I believe a man claiming to be God?


I'm sorry, but I don't believe the Bible to be from God, so I don't accept what it says as necessarily true.

Something to think about: atoms cannot be seen, and centuries ago, their presence was based merely off intuition without any evidence. "Seeing" is not always believing.

Before there was evidence for atoms why should people have believed in them? It would have been more speculation than anything else. It would make more sense to have claimed ignorance than to have made up that atoms existed. If they didn't have that evidence then it doesn't make alot of sense to claim it to be true.


I can accept Jesus was real, but I'm not sure why I should accept that Jesus was God just because the Bible says so.


I haven't seen Jesus though.


I can accept Jesus was real, but I see no reason to believe he was God.

I was once asked if I would accept the evidence put forwards for Christ if instead it was Muslims putting it forward for their beliefs. The answer is that I probably wouldn't. It's likely I'm just biased towards Christianity (though you might not see it in my replies).
 
Upvote 0

FrenchyBearpaw

Take time for granite.
Jun 13, 2011
3,252
79
✟4,283.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Your views are based on a misunderstanding of divine omnipotence. There are numerous things God cannot do.

So, there's a invisible guy in the sky who is able to make something so vast and and unbelievably mind blowing as billions of galaxies, each with trillions of stars, but isn't able to alleviate suffering, then yes, I misunderstand the limits of your god's power.
 
Upvote 0
E

Elioenai26

Guest

What caused this change?

I can accept Jesus was real, but I see no reason to believe he was God.

Are you familiar with the statement that C.S. Lewis once made which goes something like:

"Jesus Christ was either God, a liar, or a lunatic"?

Do you agree with that statement?

If so, then since you say you have no reason to believe He was God incarnate, then He must either be a liar or a lunatic or both. Why do you think Jesus was a liar and or a lunatic?
 
Upvote 0
E

Elioenai26

Guest

I would not call God's inability to do the logically impossible a limit to His power. I would call it the inability to do the logically impossible. That is no limit to His power. In fact, it is in keeping with the logic that is part and parcel of His creation. I believe God in His infinite wisdom has sufficient reasons for allowing suffering and evil to exist at the present moment. This is not logically inconsistent with God's omnipotence, omniscience, or omnibenevolence.

There are many times that humans are subjected to suffering by other humans, sometimes immense suffering, so that a greater good may result from said suffering. No one is accused in these circumstances of doing anything wrong.

If you would like to enter into some type of semi-formal dialogue where we can debate this topic: "Does the existence of human suffering prove God does not exist", I would be more than thrilled to.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Of course God can make Himself known to everyone while providing proof it is Him.

It is also possible people could reject this proof as not meeting their criteria for proof of God.

Not if God did it right... He must be aware of exactly what it would take to convince the most staunch unbeliever, and it would easily be within his power to provide sufficient proof
 
Upvote 0
E

Elioenai26

Guest
Not if God did it right... He must be aware of exactly what it would take to convince the most staunch unbeliever,

I believe He would know what it would take to convince even the most staunch unbeliever, I grant that prima facie that sounds to be more plausibly true than its negation.....go on.....

and it would easily be within his power to provide sufficient proof

Mr. Ellis, I have an argument that has been formulated by a gentleman whose line of reasoning is similar to yours and I would venture to say the majority of atheists here regarding this issue. I will present the argument below and I would like for you to tell me if you think it represents your view.

1. The Christian God strongly desires a loving relationship with almost every human being, and desires it to last for all eternity. [Christian assumption]

2. A loving relationship with God is possible only if one (a) believes that he exists and (b) chooses to be in a loving relationship with God.

3. Therefore, if the Christian God exists, since he wants humanity to have a loving relationship with him, he would make his existence well-known to almost everyone, thereby ensuring condition (a). (from 1, 2)

4. There are multitudes of conflicting religions and religious beliefs (Christianity, Islam, Hindus, Buddhism, secularism, etc), and more people who don't believe that the Christian God exists than those who do. [empirical assumption]

5. Therefore, not almost every human being believes that the Christian God exists. (from 4)

6. Therefore, the Christian God's existence is not well-known to almost everyone. (from 5)

7. Therefore, the Christian God doesn't exist. (from 6, 3)

Does this argument represent your view?






____________________________________________________________________________________

Argument courtesy of a gentleman named -Spencer, who sent this in for Dr. Craig to respond to on his Q&A #77 regarding Middle Knowledge and Christian Particularism
 
Upvote 0

FrenchyBearpaw

Take time for granite.
Jun 13, 2011
3,252
79
✟4,283.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
It's my belief, based on what you have stated, that your god is logically impossible.
 
Upvote 0

Skavau

Ode to the Forgotten Few
Sep 6, 2007
5,823
665
England
✟57,397.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
This sounds like totalitarian nightmare fuel. Absolutely frightening.

Stop lecturing people on why they think what they think.

You are not me, nor any atheist.
 
Upvote 0

Skavau

Ode to the Forgotten Few
Sep 6, 2007
5,823
665
England
✟57,397.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
There's literally nothing to see here in this thread. Elioenai asks us to explain specifically what kind of evidence would constitute reason for us to believe in God. Several people answered, or pointed out that God should be capable of making us understand and yet he has scrutinised every answer. He doesn't want an answer.

His goal was to try and get atheists to admit that no evidence could exist that could not be explained away (ironic as it would mean he would have to make the same concession). He was then going to say that this is exactly what is happening now, that there is evidence and that people are just ignoring it for -insert absurd reason- here.

Nothing more than him trying to make a false equivalence between a hypothetical and now.

When that failed he began talking down to, patronising and preaching to everyone on here. So transparent it is comical.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
Your post reinforces my point. People would rather believe in space aliens as opposed to God. The explanation for something can be anything as long as its not God.

To be fair, the epistemological hurdle is higher with supernatural beings. This isn't a matter of emotional preferences, as you are painting it.

My point is that there is no proof or evidence that God could offer to anyone that could not be explained away if that person was unwilling to see it.

And I've directly contradicted that point, even giving an example, not supported it.


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Upvote 0