- Jan 19, 2005
- 7,007
- 3,593
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
With any luck, her public antics will get her fired next year.Yikes. Frankly, she acts like an inmature teenager.
Upvote
0
With any luck, her public antics will get her fired next year.Yikes. Frankly, she acts like an inmature teenager.
So, this family values liar, married (divorce not yet final) excuse for a congresswoman, who vapes and tells a pregnant no she will not stop her vaping, makes out with a man not her husband sure did prove that she has no values.
It's a feature, not a bug. It's part of having an unacknowledged shadow. That's mostly what motivates these kinds of folks in their worldview. Outwardly, they appear to embrace old fashioned values with zeal because inwardly, they know they won't live up to them, so they blame other people and feel entitled to the mercy they won't extend to others.
Now now, we're not electing pastors here. Who among us has not gotten drunk and obstreperous, canoodled while still being technically married, and been asked to leave a public place exhibiting demonic entertainment?
My representative!
And I hear shes single now. And she makes more money than me. I'd just have to put up with a few.... behavior issues.
That pretty much sums up why, as obnoxious as I find more extreme liberals to be oftentimes, as a man who believes in Christ myself I find ultra-conservative Christians to be considerably worse with their judgmental and hypocritical rhetoric, especially when they bring out talk that heavily insinuates that if they thought they could get away with it, they'd have no qualms about grabbing the guns they love so much and committing violence against those they consider wicked enemies because of political differences (all in God's name of course >_> ).
It's a feature, not a bug. It's part of having an unacknowledged shadow. That's mostly what motivates these kinds of folks in their worldview. Outwardly, they appear to embrace old fashioned values with zeal because inwardly, they know they won't live up to them, so they blame other people and feel entitled to the mercy they won't extend to others.
I'm sorry, but what does this mean?
Now I understand Persona 4 Golden a lot more.The Jungian shadow is the opposite of the persona, the conscious self that is presented to the world:
Shadow (psychology) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
A shadow is not necessarily negative, but if a person embraces a persona based on purity, then their shadow frequently is defined by impurity that they project onto others. That's part of how authoritarian strongman politics often works, it encourages people to project their repressed unconscious onto racialized and sexualized others.
Now I understand Persona 4 Golden a lot more.
It's a unicorn: the very rare at the lowest on the crazy scale and the highest on the hot scale.What’s the horse mean?
It means the person is a fake.I'm sorry, but what does this mean?
It means the person is a fake.
Yeah, that too lol.More accurately, it means she is immature and lacks self-knowledge. She's practically a middle aged woman, but she lives, acts, and speakes like an entitled brat. However, it's hardly surprising, and she isn't alone.
The Jungian shadow is the opposite of the persona, the conscious self that is presented to the world:
Shadow (psychology) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
A shadow is not necessarily negative, but if a person embraces a persona based on purity, then their shadow frequently is defined by impurity that they project onto others. That's part of how authoritarian strongman politics often works, it encourages people to project their repressed unconscious onto racialized and sexualized others.
Thanks for the reference data. (It becomes more clear why Jordan Peterson talks like a babbling idiot. His "intellectual basis" (Jung) already sounds like that.)
The teachings of Jesus are not governing today's Republican party.“I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” --Mahatma Gandhi
Remember boys and girls, the words of Jesus are now just seen as liberal talking points.
Given Peterson's affinity for Jung, I always assumed that his 15-second definitions of Jungian terms were reasonable. It's the remaining half hour of the statement to be cautious of.Jordan Peterson isn't the best representative of Jung's thought.
Peterson seems more like an academic that fancies himself a "political technician", sort of like Alexander Dugin.
Which means he jumbles up a bunch of different ideas to try support a pre-existing political attitude. In Peterson's case, "Christian" nationalism and reactionary politics (whereas Jung's ideas tended to fit more with the emerging counterculture and human potential movement post WWII).
I've actually forgotten what they are already.The idea of shadow and persona is also a useful model for understanding personal development, and has occasionally been used in critical theory more generally to understand personal and societal behaviors.