• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,908
...
✟1,322,306.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

I am happy to address this passage. But you have to address the verses I put forth to you, as well (So as to be fair).

Okay. Which Law is Paul talking about in Galatians 2 through Galatians 3?

Paul says,
"But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised" (Galatians 2:3).

So Paul and Titus are talking about circumcision.

Is circumcision a part of the Old Testament Law given to Abraham and then to Moses?
Or is circumcision a part of the New Testament Law given to us by Jesus and His followers?

Clearly circumcision is a command given to us in the Old Law and not the New Law. So Paul is referring to the Old Law and not all law in general. Yes, we cannot be saved by keeping Law alone. We are initially and ultimately saved by God's grace through faith. But we are also saved unto good works. For one of the major reasons Christ died for us was so that we could be holy, blameless (Ephesians 5:25-27), and zealous of good works (Titus 2:14).
 
Reactions: GodsGrace101
Upvote 0

ladodgers6

Know what you believe and why you believe it
Site Supporter
Oct 6, 2015
2,326
793
Los Angeles
✟251,971.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution

So let me understand what you are suggesting here. You are saying that sinners can provide righteous acts to merit salvation from God? I hope you understand that Justification & Sanctification are distinct from each other. To place any works of the sinner in the Justification category, turns it into a legalistic salvation not based on Mercy or Grace, but on demands of the Law.

Justified by Faith

Galatians 2:15We ourselves are Jews by birth and not Gentile sinners; 16yet we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law, because by works of the law no one will be justified.

Now understand we are talking about how a sinner is justified before a Holy God! What hangs over every sinner is the curse of the Law. So before anything else, this curse needs to be taken care of. But there is a major problem. No flesh will be justified through the law. Why is Paul preaching this? To drive sinners away from their own filthy rags of righteousness; or what they think are righteous works! To Christ who saves the ungodly (Romans 4:5). God does not Justify the Righteous, but the ungodly!!!! Think about that before you reply. Why does God justify the one who does NOT WORK, but the one who believes in God who justifies the ungodly! Why?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ladodgers6

Know what you believe and why you believe it
Site Supporter
Oct 6, 2015
2,326
793
Los Angeles
✟251,971.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
So it is possible for them to fall into Antinomianism?
Yes, all believers can fall into this. But remember that Christ dies for the sins of believers too! As Graeme Goldsworthy once wrote, "Even believers need to hear the Gospel everyday".

James is preaching Antinomianism to them. They HAVE faith, but think they do not need works. True Faith in Christ produces works! This is what James is telling them. Why would James being making a contrast between Faith vs Faith with works, of they weren't believers already? James is admonishing them, and getting them back on track per se.
 
Reactions: discipler7
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,194
6,997
71
USA
✟585,424.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Justified before God.
Declared righteous by God because of our faith in His Son.

I believe we should do works for God.
But which works do you mean??

Ok, that all looks good, and as for "what works" Jesus mentioned several of them in the Sheep/Goats scripture.

How bout sin? Does sin in any form keep you from salvation? Or is obeying God and trying not to sin/asking forgiveness if we do, a part of that faith for you? Meaning you can't just cut loose, do as you wish and still make it to heaven?

I ask because some feel they can do the latter there.
 
Upvote 0

amariselle

Jesus Never Fails
Sep 28, 2004
6,648
4,201
The Great Northern Wilderness
✟75,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives

Are you saying that Paul and James don’t agree?
 
Upvote 0

GodsGrace101

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2018
6,713
2,297
Tuscany
✟255,207.00
Country
Italy
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Does sin keep us from salvation?
You must mean after salvation.
Sin is forgiven if we're sorry for it and ask forgiveness as both Jesus and John taught.
A Life Of Sin would be a problem.
IOW, we cannot do whatever we want and still be saved.
There are a lot of warnings in all the writings. Jesus spoke to this in Mathew 7, re lawlessness.

As to works,,,yes, Jesus spoke of works.
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,194
6,997
71
USA
✟585,424.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single



Hope ladodgers6 will address the question as well, and AS well. (post 36 at present)
 
Upvote 0

amariselle

Jesus Never Fails
Sep 28, 2004
6,648
4,201
The Great Northern Wilderness
✟75,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Well, I am not discounting that one needs to first half faith or belief in Jesus Christ to be saved (and that one must continue to believe in Jesus). This does not undo how we must also go through the Sanctification process so as to be saved, too.

Sanctification is also a work of the Spirit, not the flesh.

Paul was arguing against those who thought they needed to be circumcised in order to initially or ultimately saved by God (See Romans 3:1 and Galatians 5:2).

That was the issue with the Judiazers at the time, but Scripture is clear, no one is saved by any works of the Law, period.


Sure it does. It specifically talks about showing our faith by our works. Clearly so that other people can “see” our faith lived out in action.

And when we hear or read of the OT “saints”, this is precisely the case. When James wrote to the “12 tribes scattered abroad”, had any of them personally known Abraham or seen his willingness to offer His son personally? Of course not.

It is the same for us with the entire word of God and specifically the Gospel. We “see” Christ crucified when we hear or read Scripture. Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God.

One needs to have faith or belief in the Scriptures in order to truly accept that Abraham did works or not.

Of course.


See above.

As for James 2:23:
If you were to keep reading it says,

"Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only." (James 2:24).

Exactly. “You see.” That is precisely what I am saying. God had imputed righteousness to Abraham when Abraham simply believed God 25 years before Issac was even born. (As the previous verse makes clear) His willingness to offer Issac, however, is when we “see” his faith in action.

It says very clearly here how we are justified by works and not by faith only (i.e. by faith alone). This is not before men because James says faith without works is dead (James 2:17).

Read chapter 1 and the beginning of chapter 2, they give the context of the letter. It was written to saved Jewish believers of the Diaspora. James calles them “beloved brethren” several times. He is chastising them for showing favouritism to wealthy people and failing to help those in need, but he is not writing to tell them how to be saved, they already are.

James 1:21 says, "Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls."

Yes. And what “is able to save your souls”? The word or works?

James here is saying we have to put away naughtiness and or filthiness out of our lives and receive the Word (Which is able to save our souls).

No one should argue against teachings regarding spiritual maturity and being faithful disciples, however, it is not our faithfulness and obedience that saves, it is Christ’s. The obedience of ONE.

So James is saying we have to put away sin as a part of receiving God's Word (Which is able to save our souls). This sounds like a salvation issue to me.

No, he is not. James wrote his letter to his “beloved brethren”, already saved Jewish believers. And we know Jesus died for sinners, and that there is none righteous, no not one. What you are suggesting is that people need to clean themselves up before Christ can save them. This is false. Jesus Himself rebuked the religious leaders for this mentality, they were good at “cleaning the outside of the cup”, but inside they were full of all uncleaness. Only God can clean the “inside of the cup.” Only in Him are we made new creations, born again and sealed by the Holy Spirit until the day of redemption.


Yes, we endure temptation, but true life is found only in the Son. Eternal life is a gift, not a wage or a reward. If there are certain Scriptures difficult to understand, we do well to study carefully on the matter to rightly divide the word of truth.


Paul plainly taught that by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in the sight of God, and that we are saved by, grace, through faith and not of works; salvation is a gift of God, lest any many should boast.

Sounds pretty clear to me.
 
Upvote 0

GodsGrace101

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2018
6,713
2,297
Tuscany
✟255,207.00
Country
Italy
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married


Hope ladodgers6 will address the question as well, and AS well. (post 36 at present)
It seems like he might agree.
I've found, on these forums, that some cannot explain the difference between Jstfcn and Sanctfcn.
This is a problem.
 
Upvote 0

Doug Melven

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,080
2,585
61
Wyoming
✟90,808.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
This was hard for me to tell when you were speaking and when you were quoting somebody else because you wrote a paragraph and then went on to refute it. Confusing.
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,194
6,997
71
USA
✟585,424.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
It seems like he might agree.
I've found, on these forums, that some cannot explain the difference between Jstfcn and Sanctfcn.
This is a problem.

I agree, thought there are some that are very clear on some of the outrageous beliefs they have, others, are in an area like you mention, while others don't quite know what to think because they have so much conflicting info coming a them, and that too is a problem.
 
Upvote 0

Traveling teacher

Well-Known Member
May 2, 2017
993
500
66
Belton
✟46,854.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
....
throughout the teaches in the OT and NT and especially Jesus teachings......

Faith was always less important than love.....
which is the greatest commandment

Faith alone without love is NOTHING....according to 1 corinthians 13

LOVE is the standard for salvation....
and if it is Love this can only come from a long term relationsihp with Jesus Christ

John 21:16
Jesus didnt ask Peter about his faith...but asked him if he loved him.....
as Peter earlier declared Jesus to be the Christ proving his faith.....

mathew 16:16
 
Reactions: zoidar
Upvote 0

GodsGrace101

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2018
6,713
2,297
Tuscany
✟255,207.00
Country
Italy
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We shouldn't be learning our faith here. We should already have the basics.
.......night.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So to clear, the good works of the believer goes into the category of Sanctification, not Justification. When you understand this you will understand how to distinct the Law & Gospel in relation to Justification by Faith Alone!
Amen brother. And to add to your comments even the works we do are credited to Christ by His Grace as the Council of Orange makes very painfully clear.

CANON 6. If anyone says that God has mercy upon us when, apart from his grace, we believe, will, desire, strive, labor, pray, watch, study, seek, ask, or knock, but does not confess that it is by the infusion and inspiration of the Holy Spirit within us that we have the faith, the will, or the strength to do all these things as we ought; or if anyone makes the assistance of grace depend on the humility or obedience of man and does not agree that it is a gift of grace itself that we are obedient and humble, he contradicts the Apostle who says, "What have you that you did not receive?" (1 Cor. 4:7), and, "But by the grace of God I am what I am" (1 Cor. 15:10).

CANON 7. If anyone affirms that we can form any right opinion or make any right choice which relates to the salvation of eternal life, as is expedient for us, or that we can be saved, that is, assent to the preaching of the gospel through our natural powers without the illumination and inspiration of the Holy Spirit, who makes all men gladly assent to and believe in the truth, he is led astray by a heretical spirit, and does not understand the voice of God who says in the Gospel, "For apart from me you can do nothing" (John 15:5), and the word of the Apostle, "Not that we are competent of ourselves to claim anything as coming from us; our competence is from God" (2 Cor. 3:5).

Historic Church Documents at Reformed.org

About the Council of Orange 529 AD:

The Council of Orange was an outgrowth of the controversy between Augustine and Pelagius. This controversy had to do with degree to which a human being is responsible for his or her own salvation, and the role of the grace of God in bringing about salvation. The Pelagians held that human beings are born in a state of innocence, i.e., that there is no such thing as a sinful nature or original sin.

As a result of this view, they held that a state of sinless perfection was achievable in this life. The Council of Orange dealt with the Semi-Pelagian doctrine that the human race, though fallen and possessed of a sinful nature, is still "good" enough to able to lay hold of the grace of God through an act of unredeemed human will. The Council held to Augustine's view and repudiated Pelagius.
 
Upvote 0

amariselle

Jesus Never Fails
Sep 28, 2004
6,648
4,201
The Great Northern Wilderness
✟75,570.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
This was hard for me to tell when you were speaking and when you were quoting somebody else because you wrote a paragraph and then went on to refute it. Confusing.

Where? Honestly, I’m not sure what you’re referring to.
 
Upvote 0

faroukfarouk

Fading curmudgeon
Apr 29, 2009
35,915
17,131
Canada
✟287,108.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Romans 5.1.

Follow what BB Warfield wrote on justification in 1911, not what Karl Barth wrote on the subject in his commentary on Romans in 1918. BB W believed in a Scriptural reckoning by faith; KB tried to advance a supposed infused righteousness not appreciably different from what Rome has taught for centuries.
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,908
...
✟1,322,306.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

So if you don't do good works as a part of the salvation process, that can only lead one to conclude that one can do evil works as a part of the salvation process.

There are only two options that you are faced with.

We are saved by:

#1. God's grace + good works (or):
#2. God's grace + evil works.

You cannot avoid the works issue, unless you are the thief on the cross, and or you were presented the gospel while you were on your death bed.

Question: Do you believe David was saved while he was committing his sins of adultery and murder?

As for being justified by faith:

Well, I believe we are initially and ultimately justified by God's grace through faith in Jesus Christ and not by the works of the Law alone.

When Paul says the "works of the Law" he is talking about the Old Testament Law of Moses and not all law. This is evident by the fact if you were to read Galatians 2:3, Galatians 5:2, and Romans 3:1.

Paul is concerned with those who are trying to be justified by the Old Law without God's grace.


Jesus is the great physician. He came to heal those who were sick. The sickness or disease is sin. So if Jesus is not curing men of their sin, then he is not being a very good doctor. Jesus says he comes to call sinners to repentance.

Repentance is seeking forgiveness with the Lord (Which is then followed by the fruits of repentance, i.e. forsaking sin).

Romans 13:14 says,
"But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof."

Galatians 5:24 says,
"And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts."

Jesus says if you love me, keep my commandments (John 14:15).
Paul says if any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be accursed (1 Corinthians 16:22).

As for Romans 4:5:

When Paul says "to him that worketh not," he is referencing the believer who first comes to Jesus Christ so as to be justified by faith by seeking His forgiveness and believing in His death and resurrection vs. those who wanted to wrongfully be circumcised in order to be right with God (under the New Covenant). For Romans 3:1 says, "What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?"

Paul is talking in context to those who want to be circumcised to be right with God.

When Paul says, "...believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness." He again is talking about coming to Jesus for salvation for the first time and or how one is ultimately saved. Paul is not saying that the Lord justifies those who continue to live ungodly. Paul is talking about how he justifies a person who used to be an ungodly sinner.

Ephesians 2:2-3 says,
2 "Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others."

1 Peter 1:14 says,
"As obedient children, not fashioning yourselves according to the former lusts in your ignorance:"

1 Corinthians 6:9-11 says,
9 "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
11 And such were some of you..."

2 Peter 2:5-6 says,
5 "And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;
6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;"
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Doug Melven

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
3,080
2,585
61
Wyoming
✟90,808.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Where? Honestly, I’m not sure what you’re referring to.
It looks like these are responses to the ones below the lines.

Sure it does. It specifically talks about showing our faith by our works. Clearly so that other people can “see” our faith lived out in action.

Of course.

See above.

Yes. And what “is able to save your souls”? The word or works?



Sounds pretty clear to me.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No one should argue against teachings regarding spiritual maturity and being faithful disciples, however, it is not our faithfulness and obedience that saves, it is Christ’s. The obedience of ONE.

Paul plainly taught that by the works of the Law no flesh will be justified in the sight of God, and that we are saved by, grace, through faith and not of works; salvation is a gift of God, lest any many should boast.

These look like response words to me.

Sure it does

No, he is not

Yes, we endure temptation, but
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,908
...
✟1,322,306.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Yes, all believers can fall into this. But remember that Christ dies for the sins of believers too! As Graeme Goldsworthy once wrote, "Even believers need to hear the Gospel everyday".

How would you classify an Antinomian believer?
Are Antinomian believers saved?


So you believe they were saved despite their hating the poor brethren by their actions?
1 John 3:15 says if we hate our brother, we are like a murderer and no murderer has eternal life abiding in them.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Is this is why some tried to cast the epistle of James as an epistle of straw? Something to be burned up and forgotten?
You mean lead theologian at the Council of Trent Cardinal Cajetan?


Cajetan Responds by Jared Wicks:

Cajetan's biblical commentaries occasioned no little admiratio. From Luther, there is a recorded remark, "Cajetan, in his later days, has become Lutheran." Considerable zeal was expended by Ambrosius Catharinus, O.P., against the exegetical work of his retired Master General. Catharinus submitted a denunciation before the still acerbic faculty in Paris and proceedings began that could have led to another book-burning Clement VII intervened in a letter to the Parisian professors in September, 1533, to protect the man who was by then the Pope's regular source of valued theological advice. Proceedings were halted at this time in Paris, but not before an open letter of the Parisian theologians had begun to circulate listing the censurable propositions excerpted from the commentaries. The Sorbonne masters charged Cajetan with imprudently taking these notions from Erasmus or even Luther. The letter ended with a stinging rebuke of Cajetan's rashness in abandoning the long approved Vulgate text to base his work on new versions in no way guaranteed for their exactness. In 1534 a Wittenberg printer, no doubt with considerable glee over this discomfiture of Luther's old adversary, brought out the open letter in pamphlet form. Catharinus published his criticisms of Cajetan's commentaries in 1535, revised and expanded them in 1542, and obtained a censure by the Paris faculty against Cajetan's biblical works in August, 1544.

The specific charges brought against Cajetan concerned the reservations and plain doubts he had expressed about the apostolic origin of the final eleven verses of Mark's gospel, the story of the adultress in John 8, and five whole epistles of the New Testament (Hebrews, James, Jude, and 1 and 2 John). These views were especially serious in Cajetan's case, since he had laid down the rule that apostolic authorship or direct approval by an apostle was normative for inclusion in the New Testament canon. Following Jerome, Cajetan also relegated the deuterocanonical books of the Old Testament to a secondary place where they could serve piety but not the teaching of revealed doctrine.


Jared Wicks tr., Cajetan Responds: A Reader in Reformation Controversy (Washington: The Catholic University Press of America, 1978).

Cajetan Responds
 
Upvote 0