If this bothers you a lot...
Again you are being disingenuous. And that is being kind.
Biden has a long history of inappropriate contact with both women and children, behavior captured on video time and again. I know from past history you will defend Biden, obfuscate, attempt to misdirect, and basically talk out your backside because devotion to your god. But the video evidence is clear:
During this one video Biden calls the girl to his side, insist she stand next to him, and then touches and strokes her twenty-six different times during a three minute time frame. Such behavior is not simply impolite, it is indicative of extreme arrogance, narcissism, and questionable sexual predilections.
Again, Biden has a long history of this. However you will again refuse to acknowledge such behavior is even qualifies as impolite because devotion to your god.
Ergo:
This is yet another in a never-ending line of disingenuous attempts to disparage the character of a man you have never met. A standard tactic of the American left.
Here is the actual video from which this frame was taken:
As can be clearly seen this was a campaign event during which Trump called two children forward. He both acknowledged and praised their parents, had the children speak to the crowd, and then did something politicians have been doing since the first politician, gave each child a kiss.
The image you posted is pure propaganda. In an effort to defend Biden's clear and habitual inappropriate behavior with multiple women and children someone tracked through the Trump Campaign video until they found an image which could be used to promote a false narrative. In other words a lie, that nothing Biden has ever done can be or should be questioned because Trump once kissed an African-American girl on the cheek.
The sickening behavior here is where one always finds sickening behavior, within the ranks of the slavish left grovelling in religious devotion before their graven images.
Ergo:
Then there's a bigger problem for you than just politics. The kid obviously didn't want Trump handling her, and he's still coming on with open mouth kissing.
Do you all see how this works? Even given video of the Trump event exist and clearly exposes the lie of the above comment, the image posted is still presented as proof of Trump chasing after and grabbing children against their will because he is some form of pervert.
Trump has exposed who the American left in general truly are, how they truly think, and the lengths they are willing to go to driven by their hate.
Ya think? But then Trump once walked through a dressing room full of nude and partially-nude kids, and laughed about it. So he's got a history.
From the
Independent dot UK, quote:
"Donald Trump used to “stroll right in” to the dressing room of beauty pageants while the contestants - some of whom were teenagers - were naked or half-dressed, a former model has claimed."
From
Politifact, quote:
"
Of the 11 (contestants) who said they don’t remember Trump coming into the changing room, some said it was possible that it happened while they weren’t in the room or that they didn’t notice. But most were dubious or dismissed the possibility out of hand."
Again the mentality in play is evident. A former model made a claim, therefore it must be true.
In regard to the comment made on the Howard Stern show, Trump was responding to a question about the Miss USA and Miss Universe pageants, both of which are restricted to adults. The claim Trump bragged about walking in on partially-nude kids and laughed about it is just another lie.
No sane or rational person would call Trump "normal" or "acceptable." As you know, Trump's sexually agressive behavior toward adults is well documented, as is his notion that it's O.K. because he's "a celebrity."
This again.
For those who possess any intellectual curiosity, do a bit of research into the claims made against Trump by the often cited sixteen women and you will again find unnamed sources, unsubstantiated claims, witnesses who were not even in the room when the supposed events occurred, statements the events did not occur made by others who were actually in the room when the supposed events occurred, and of course the ever-present anonymous source.
In other words, all the stuff liberals consider solid proof.
So it's not surprising that he would do this with kids.
How do you justify such hate?
