• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Just curious, how many of you identify as feminists?

Tolworth John

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 10, 2017
8,276
4,681
70
Tolworth
✟414,919.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Take away Christianity and can you from philosophy or any other set of ideas justify your beliefs about equality and the roles of men and women?
 
Upvote 0

bekkilyn

Contemplative Christian
Site Supporter
Apr 27, 2017
7,612
8,476
USA
✟700,228.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
Take away Christianity and can you from philosophy or any other set of ideas justify your beliefs about equality and the roles of men and women?

Which form of Christianity are we taking away? Do not mistake the religion and institution of of Christianity in its myriad forms, many of which have been extraordinarily harmful to women, with the gospel of Jesus Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Gregorikos

Ordinary Mystic
Dec 31, 2019
1,103
893
Louisville, Kentucky
Visit site
✟123,227.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
It is Christianity that supports equality, no other philosophical idea does.
It is Christianity that places value on both men and women yet also assigned separate roles to them.

Take away Christianity and can you from philosophy or any other set of ideas justify your beliefs about equality and the roles of men and women?

Every post you've made in this thread mentions both equality and something you call "roles" of men and women. Replies to you pointing out the inherent discrepancy between these so-called "roles" and equality have gone unanswered.

Why don't you tell us about these "roles" to which you refer?
 
Upvote 0

KitKat1230

Truth Seeker
Oct 7, 2019
74
89
28
California
✟50,517.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

I've seen Hidden Figures, it's such a great movie. And I'm so glad that more women are going into STEM.

As for Lori Alexander, I will do that. I looked up other stuff she said and people pointing out how hypocritical and problematic she is, and so I am not interested in taking advice from her.
 
Reactions: Paidiske
Upvote 0

Tolworth John

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 10, 2017
8,276
4,681
70
Tolworth
✟414,919.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Which form of Christianity are we taking away? Do not mistake the religion and institution of of Christianity in its myriad forms, many of which have been extraordinarily harmful to women, with the gospel of Jesus Christ.

I refer primarily to what the Bible teaches about the roles of men and women.
That the role of a man is to provide for and lead his family through the advice and support of his wife.
No where does the Bible teach that women if inferior to men, but that they are equal.
 
Upvote 0

Tolworth John

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 10, 2017
8,276
4,681
70
Tolworth
✟414,919.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

I reply to every post hat is a reply or quote of any I make, so as I haven't replied to other posts that weren't quoting mine your accusation is unfounded.

As for roles the Bible teaches the traditional role of men as provided and leader and women as child rearers and supporters of the man.

That does not make her inferior, nor does it make him superior.
 
Upvote 0

Gregorikos

Ordinary Mystic
Dec 31, 2019
1,103
893
Louisville, Kentucky
Visit site
✟123,227.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
As for roles the Bible teaches the traditional role of men as provided and leader and women as child rearers and supporters of the man.

That does not make her inferior, nor does it make him superior.

Well to argue that is to violate the rules of this forum, and that would mean your previous posts where you alluded to such "roles" are in violation of the rules. I suggest you stop doing that in this forum.

And your statement is contradictory. If men are assigned to be leaders and women must follow and support their leadership, how is that equal? It's not.

What if I said all UK counties are equal but only Yorkshire gets to choose the Prime Minister? I'm sure you'd admit that isn't equal at all.
 
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,897
14,168
✟458,328.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
I am in what is probably in many places a female-dominated field (Linguistics), though many of the most well-known linguists are men. Still, for every William Labov there is a Robin Lakoff, and I had just as many female advisors while still a student as male advisors, so I owe my learning to women just as much as men. So it is with most things in life, at least where I live.

The thing I don't like about feminism is the same as what I don't like about most things: it's far too easy to get sold on a 'package deal' without realizing everything you're signing up for. If I'm for the equality of men and women in general, does that mean I should be obliged to see the evil hand of 'the Patriarchy' working in everything? What about things that I think are fine as they are, like the Church hierarchy in Orthodoxy? I'm not about to start messing with that or advocating that others do so because feminism. Too often I find that people who are quick to pull out the 'There is no male or female in Christ' as a way of highlighting the God-sanctioned equality of the sexes do not put Christ similarly above their favorite -ism, like feminism or egalitarianism, or whatever. (And same too for those who are believers in conservatism, libertarianism, etc.; this just isn't their particular forum.)

So while I'm personally not very comfortable with the label of feminist for myself, I'm probably more in line with it on many (not all) individual issues that feminists are often arguing for, like fighting sex-based discrimination in employment and elsewhere, supporting and protecting women who are attempting to leave domestic violence situations, fixing the abysmal state of childcare in the United States, etc. These are all worthy goals, regardless of how anyone labels them.

That's what I'd focus on, OP: what are your goals, rather than whether or not some particular label or other fits those goals. But that's just me.
 
Upvote 0

Junia

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2020
2,795
1,387
43
Bristol
✟31,159.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private


Hello! Fellow Scrupulosity OCD sufferer here! I also stumbled onto Transformed Wife and it messed me up for a long time. Also suffer trauma issues (am in intense therapy twice weekly) from abuse from a Christian father and a legalistic evangelical upbringing which am de constructing from

I was allowed and in fact, encouraged to have a career for which am grateful for but my mother was not allowed to leave my father. also Lori Alexander's issues with women leaving home as soon as they adults and being independent really affected me because I kept thinking I had been rebellious to leave my father in spite of the abuse...this was massively triggering because dad used to say that all women are under fathers authority until they marry....


Lori also believes that childfree by choice if you're married is a sin but I never desired children and my health issues (physical disability as well as mental) would !take that impossible....the verse about women being saved by childbearing really threw me off balance but someone reassured me that it refers to Mary having Jesus....

I don't like the word feminist because of what the term has come to mean these days, e.g. Abortion on demand for non medical reasons, which I disagree with.

And yet....I also see nothing in Bible saying women cannot vote, have a job, prophesy, evangelize (I know some say women can't be pastors ).

I also support women a rights in terms of shelters for domestic violence, any support for victims /survivors of abuse, (also for m ale victims as well) and I think secular movements who work with domestic violence and rape survivors have many insights that the church would benefit from.

I don't buy that all secular knowledge is world or demonic either....only if it goes against the Bible..all good gifts are from God....

So i don't know what i 'd call myself. I would say just a Christian who knows God is love and honours women


As for biblical gender roles in marriage, God intended the man to be head in sense of being a protector of the woman, not lording it over her.

It does make sense that if a wife and mother can afford to stay home to care for her children, that is better for them, but not all women can afford to, not all are called to be wives or mothers either...and even for wives and mothers God may have a calling for them which extends outside the home. I read the keepers at home scripture to mean two things. Number 1, women in Paul's day were generally 98% wives and mothers and were expected to be home, women married at puberty straight from their fathers or uncles or brothers home. Number 2/ I don't think even then it meant women could not have interests of their own as long as the children and home were the main focus. So today, if a mother has outside interests that is ok if she still has the and focus for and in her children

those are just my opinions though

I would say that I am mostly complementarian as I don't have an issue with husband being head of the wife as long as that doesn't mean he is lording it over her. and there should be no abuse. But it took me many years , decades to accept that because of the abuse making me wary of male authority.

I think one has to be aware of extremes. I see a lot of legalism in movements like The Transformed Wife, Biblical Gender Roles, Quiverfull, Bill Gothard etc and I really don't think Jesus died for us to be in bondage. And don't get me started on some of the more extreme holiness churches where a woman is damned to hell if she trims her hair (bible says hair not to be shorn on a woman, doesn't say it can't be trimmed, bobbed or styled) or wears a bathing suit.
 
Upvote 0

Junia

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2020
2,795
1,387
43
Bristol
✟31,159.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private


The biblical gender roles are for wives and mothers and also apply to church settings e.g. "A woman shouldn't teach" was only applied in the church. God hasn't issues with women voting or having careers or deciding to live single and independent as long as no fornication. A woman can have pets instead of children and still be serving the Lord wholeheartedly!

I do see your point as regards labels though.
 
Upvote 0

Junia

Well-Known Member
May 17, 2020
2,795
1,387
43
Bristol
✟31,159.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private


Yes!

There is nothing wrong with being a wife and mother full time. I do think mothers have a vocation, a calling from God and it is a special one. I expect in heaven their reward is great.

But not all of us can be like that. I haven't the strength physically or of character , many women don't . and that's ok too.

God has a a plan for each of His children and it isn't all the same. YEs, the majority of women will feel sexual desire, and so should marry. and children, if they can afford to, either financially or in terms of health and wellbeing, are a blessing.

But we aren't all made the same and there are so manifests to serve the Lord.
 
Reactions: KitKat1230
Upvote 0

Emily Write

Member
Jul 19, 2021
8
15
27
Texas
✟22,889.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
I would say I am a feminist to some extent, but do not agree with all sections of it. I am more for the ongoing and much needed international kind in nations where women lack much needed rights rather than the modern American version we see in YouTube yelling about how all men are trashy rapists.

Like for the best example, I really hate the stuff that gives all men a hard time rather than just the ones who are predators. The greatest kinds that I would say are the ones that fight for women's basic human rights to have control over their own lives with being able to drive, own a bank account, get an education, have a job, choose who or if they marry, fights against child marriage, anti rape, etc.
 
Upvote 0

*Starlight*

Let the Dragon ride again on the winds of time
Jan 19, 2005
75,346
1,474
38
Right in front of you *waves*
Visit site
✟140,803.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Just thought about resurrecting an old thread

I support gender equality, and I'd rather just identify as an egalitarian rather than a feminist.

Feminism isn't really unified, there are many different forms of it, and some of them even call each other "not true feminists". It's a mess. Some forms of feminism are egalitarian (equity feminism, for example), while other forms aren't (like the SJWs you mentioned in the OP). And the non-egalitarian ones seem more popular, so calling myself a "feminist" could be misleading and not accurately express my egalitarian views.
 
Upvote 0

peaceful-forest

Kevin, where are you?
Nov 5, 2022
1,342
1,105
34
-
✟97,839.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Years ago, I used to call myself a feminist. I don't remember what the exact cause was, but I had quit identifying as a feminist. I think this happened in the late 2010s or early 2020s.

From my perspective, the definition of feminism has changed. It used to be about women having the choice to go to work or stay at home. Now it's about supporting, promoting, and/or engaging in two particular sins.
 
Upvote 0

Gregorikos

Ordinary Mystic
Dec 31, 2019
1,103
893
Louisville, Kentucky
Visit site
✟123,227.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
From my perspective, the definition of feminism has changed. It used to be about women having the choice to go to work or stay at home. Now it's about supporting, promoting, and/or engaging in two particular sins.

It was always about more than giving women the choice to have a job outside the home if they wanted to. Elizabeth Cady Stanton drafted the Declaration of Sentiments, which pointed out the facts that-

  • Married women were legally dead in the eyes of the law
  • Women were not allowed to vote
  • Women had to submit to laws when they had no voice in their formation
  • Married women had no property rights
  • Husbands had legal power over and responsibility for their wives to the extent that they could imprison or beat them with impunity
  • Divorce and child custody laws favored men, giving no rights to women
  • Women had to pay property taxes although they had no representation in the levying of these taxes
  • Most occupations were closed to women and when women did work they were paid only a fraction of what men earned
  • Women were not allowed to enter professions such as medicine or law
  • Women had no means to gain an education since no college or university would accept women students
  • With only a few exceptions, women were not allowed to participate in the affairs of the church
  • Women were robbed of their self-confidence and self-respect, and were made totally dependent on men

Some of these are still issues today, especially in the church it is not a sin to oppose these things. It's a sin to support them.
 
Upvote 0