• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

LDS Joseph Smith's Claim of an Apostasy is a Lie

ArmenianJohn

Politically Liberal Christian Fundamentalist
Jan 30, 2013
8,962
5,551
New Jersey (NYC Metro)
✟205,252.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Neither of these say that God's Truth is just limited to the Bible. Rather the Matthew verse talks about the fulfillment of the Law of Moses, and Timothy talks about the purpose of scripture.
The passage in Matthew shows that Christ was to "fulfill" the Law while He was here. He was to complete the law - His work would culminate in leaving us with the completed written Word of God. He would provide the New Testament to fulfill the Old Testament which was already recorded by then. He would accomplish this through His Disciples as was prophesied in the Old Testament:

Isaiah 8:13–17 - “Sanctify the lord of hosts himself; and let him be your fear, and let him be your dread. And he shall be to you for a sanctuary; but for a stone of stumbling and for a rock of offense to both houses of Israel, for a gin and for a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem. And many among them shall stumble, and fall, and be broken, and be snared, and be taken. Bind up the testimony, seal the Law AMONG MY DISCIPLES. And I will wait upon the Lord, that hides his face from the house of Jacob, and I will look for him.

The Lord completed the scripture through His Disciples.

The passage in Timothy confirms that scripture is "sufficient" and that there is no additional scripture required beyond what has been given to us. This means that additional "scriptures" that come after the Bible are automatically not true scriptures. That's why the Book of Mormon and the other Mormon scriptures are worthless, just like the Koran or any other false scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Jane_Doe

Well-Known Member
Jun 12, 2015
6,658
1,042
116
✟107,821.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Again, I agree with you that the Matthew verses fulfill the Law of Moses. But it doesn't say anything God's words & Truth being limited to just what's in the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

ArmenianJohn

Politically Liberal Christian Fundamentalist
Jan 30, 2013
8,962
5,551
New Jersey (NYC Metro)
✟205,252.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Again, I agree with you that the Matthew verses fulfill the Law of Moses. But it doesn't say anything God's words & Truth being limited to just what's in the Bible.
I don't understand what you're trying to say. First you say you agree with me then you say you don't agree with me. Please clarify.
 
Upvote 0

Jane_Doe

Well-Known Member
Jun 12, 2015
6,658
1,042
116
✟107,821.00
Gender
Female
Faith
I don't understand what you're trying to say. First you say you agree with me then you say you don't agree with me. Please clarify.
I agree: the verse talks about Christ fulfilling the Law of Moses.
I disagree with any statement that this verse says the God's Truth is limited to just what's in the Bible or that the canon is closed.
 
Upvote 0

ArmenianJohn

Politically Liberal Christian Fundamentalist
Jan 30, 2013
8,962
5,551
New Jersey (NYC Metro)
✟205,252.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I agree: the verse talks about Christ fulfilling the Law of Moses.
I disagree with any statement that this verse says the God's Truth is limited to just what's in the Bible or that the canon is closed.
It's the same thing. We have a completed Scripture. There are no more prophets and haven't been since John the Baptist. God has revealed all He intended to reveal for the Church Age until the Second Coming of Christ.

You can disagree with that but it contradicts your saying that the Law is fulfilled and it contradicts the Bible.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jane_Doe

Well-Known Member
Jun 12, 2015
6,658
1,042
116
✟107,821.00
Gender
Female
Faith
It's the same thing. We have a completed Scripture. There are no more prophets and haven't been since John the Baptist. God has revealed all He intended to reveal for the Church Age until the Second Coming of Christ.
Do you have a Bible verse which says of this?
You can disagree with that but it contradicts your saying that the Law is fulfilled and it contradicts the Bible.
I'm not disagreeing with the Bible. I'm disagreeing with the non-Biblical ideas you're saying here.
 
Upvote 0

ArmenianJohn

Politically Liberal Christian Fundamentalist
Jan 30, 2013
8,962
5,551
New Jersey (NYC Metro)
✟205,252.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Do you have a Bible verse which says of this?
Luke 16:16
The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.

I'm not disagreeing with the Bible. I'm disagreeing with the non-Biblical ideas you're saying here.
What non-Biblical ideas? I simply quoted the Bible. The Bible says that Christ said He was here to fulfill the Law. You agreed with that.

Are you changing it now to say you don't agree that Christ fulfilled the Law and therefore more had to be done through Joseph Smith?

I wish you would just say what you mean rather than dodging things with vague remarks like "the non-Biblical ideas you're saying here". Quote me, point to what I'm saying and be clear.

There is so much back and forth with you because you never provide evidence or point to what it is you're talking about. You quote out of context, you sometimes don't quote at all, you make assertions without any evidence. I have to pull teeth to get any kind of straight or clear response from you. I honestly don't know if it's laziness on your part or inability to converse or intentional ambiguity to cover up a weak position on your part.
 
Upvote 0

Jane_Doe

Well-Known Member
Jun 12, 2015
6,658
1,042
116
✟107,821.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Luke 16:16
The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.
Doesn't say that it's the end of scripture.

What non-Biblical ideas? I simply quoted the Bible. The Bible says that Christ said He was here to fulfill the Law. You agreed with that. Are you changing it now to say you don't agree that Christ fulfilled the Law?
The following statements you have made are not in the Bible at all (I'm taking this from post #86):
1) The law and scripture are the same thing. --- Not in the Bible, and contradicts the Bible (the Bible continues on after the fulfillment of the Law of Moses)
2) We have a completed Scripture. -- Not in the Bible
3) There are no more prophets and haven't been since John the Baptist. --- Such a statement contradicts the Bible, for example the many reference to prophets in the Book of Revelation.
4) God has revealed all He intended to reveal for the Church Age until the Second Coming of Christ.-- Not in the Bible
 
Upvote 0

ArmenianJohn

Politically Liberal Christian Fundamentalist
Jan 30, 2013
8,962
5,551
New Jersey (NYC Metro)
✟205,252.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I've refuted all these and you're here now simply claiming that I haven't. I'm not going to repeat myself just because you're playing games.
 
Upvote 0

Jane_Doe

Well-Known Member
Jun 12, 2015
6,658
1,042
116
✟107,821.00
Gender
Female
Faith
I've refuted all these and you're here now simply claiming that I haven't. I'm not going to repeat myself just because you're playing games.

I claim it, because you haven't refuted anything. Every verse you post as "defense" of your views doesn't actually say what you say the point you claim it's making.
 
Upvote 0

withwonderingawe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2015
3,592
510
72
Salem Ut
✟184,049.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

Well I think it needs to be understood what the "fulfilling the Law" means

17 ¶Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

I think we all agree that by fulfilling the Law of Moses he meant his sacrifice would be the last great sacrifice and no more would be needed.

But what did he mean by fulfil the prophets?

John 1:45
45 Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.

Philip and the other apostles understood that the Messiah would come and they understood Moses' laws of sacrifices were pointing to that coming. Now why isn't the Old Testament clear on that point? Oh there are a few passages like Isa 53 but as the Book of Mormon says

"...for behold, they have taken away from the gospel of the Lamb many parts which are plain and most precious; and also many covenants of the Lord have they taken away." 1 Nephi 13

Why don't we have anything dating back beyond about 150bc?

Among the Dead Sea Scrolls there is one called 4Q246 The Son of God Scroll

"[X] shall be great upon the earth. [O King all (people) shall] make [peace], and all shall serve [Him. He shall be called the Son of] the [G]reat [God], and by His Name shall He be hailed (as) the Son of God, and they shall call Him Son of the Most High like a shooting star....Their kingdom will be an eternal kingdom, and their paths will be righteous. They will judge"

The Angel Gabriel who appeared to Mary paraphrased that passage.
Luke 1
32 He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David:
33 And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.

Jesus said; Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

Jesus said to the Jews; "Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad"

On the road to Emmaus Jesus opens the scriptures to the disciples;
"And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself"

and later he says;
"These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me"

Where are all of these prophecies? Where is the prophecy concerning

Well there are a number of lost scriptures "...sayings of the seers.." 2 Chr. 33:19, acts of Abijah … in the story of the prophet Iddo: 2 Chr. 13:22 and many others.

Mathew quoted another "23 And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene." Where did that come from?

And the Wise Men who came looking for the baby " for we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him...
When they had heard the king, they departed; and, lo, the star, which they saw in the east, went before them, till it came and stood over where the young child was. When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceeding great joy."

There is no scripture in the Old Testament that speaks of a new star to be seen over the place where the Baby Jesus could be found, a Star out of Jacob yes but nothing about a New Star over the baby. Why did they follow that star?
(There is in the Book of Mormon, Hel 14.)

The theory is that between the death of Jesus and the point of when the Bible was put together the Jews removed everything they could which prophesied of the coming of the Messiah, his death and resurrection.

But the Book of Mormon mentions some prophecies which they brought with them;

9 And the world, because of their iniquity, shall judge him to be a thing of naught; wherefore they scourge him, and he suffereth it; and they smite him, and he suffereth it. Yea, they spit upon him, and he suffereth it, because of his loving kindness and his long-suffering towards the children of men..... yieldeth himself, according to the words of the angel, as a man, into the hands of wicked men, to be lifted up, according to the words of Zenock, and to be crucified, according to the words of Neum, and to be buried in a sepulchre, according to the words of Zenos, which he spake concerning the three days of darkness, which should be a sign given of his death..." 1Nephi 19:29

But the point is Jesus wasn't saying he was the end of prophecy but that the prophecies which had been made concerning him had come to pass.
 
Upvote 0

tickingclocker

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2016
2,355
978
US
✟29,521.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What employment did JS hold while creating his church? Did he work as a ditch digger? A glasslooker, then? An honest, successful banker? How about a tavern innkeeper? What else was there.... Oh, yes. Illustrious Mayor of Nauvoo, IL.

All dismal failures.

JS hated physical work, and said so quite often to many people. That and so much more is edited out of his personal works as they are painstakingly gone through with a fine-toothed comb before being slowly released to LDS. If the LDS has nothing to hide, why not just publish what JS's secretaries wrote down for all to see?

Wouldn't be all that "faith promoting" then, would it?
 
Upvote 0

tickingclocker

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2016
2,355
978
US
✟29,521.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
If that's the case, that "revelation" is the "rock", then why would withwonderingawe claim in post #24 ????:

"The church is not the Rock, in that case you'd better become Catholic.

Jesus himself is the Rock."

No. They don't differ. The LDS promotes this "revelation" bit, them and the FLDS. They must depend upon it being true.

The other main branches of mormonism believe JS became sinfully enamored with his own power, and God essentially dismissed him from His service as "prophet". They all reject 99% of Mormon doctrines, including this one. So, they don't "differ". They are ENTIRELY and completely different!

The "Rock" in that verse has always remained Jesus Christ alone, outside of the LDS and FLDS.
 
Upvote 0

tickingclocker

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2016
2,355
978
US
✟29,521.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

It upsets Mormons to no end that mormonism remains staunchly unrecognized as legitimate by all of Christianity, but Christianity will recognize those who severely argued with each other over doctrinal points throughout history, causing schism, and even persecuted each other to death. Some of those arguments are still ongoing, yet we continue to recognize the "doctrinally different side" as legitimate brothers and sisters in Jesus Christ.

The LDS sees all other branches of mormonism as apostates from them. There is no alliance or spiritual brotherhood within mormonism's ranks, like there is within Christianity.
 
Upvote 0

ArmenianJohn

Politically Liberal Christian Fundamentalist
Jan 30, 2013
8,962
5,551
New Jersey (NYC Metro)
✟205,252.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
You're right - and let me point out a couple of ironies in that whole scenario...

First, they consider Christianity to be apostate from them, yet at the same time they claim to believe in the same Jesus as Christians, and the same Salvation as Christians, and that they themselves are to be rightfully called "Christians" - they want so much to be recognized as "Christians" and have their beliefs seen as being in line with orthodox Christian beliefs but all the while they consider orthodox Christians to be "apostates" and their prophets for decades have spoken out against Christianity. Ironic that they want the apostates to accept them as fellow Christians.

The second irony is that while it kills them to be rejected as Christians by orthodox Christians, the main Mormon Church (the Salt Lake denomination, the largest one) rejects all the other Mormon denominations as being "LDS". They do not recognize the FLDS as "LDS" even though "LDS" is right there in that church's name. They don't recognize the RLDS or the Strangites or any of the other LDS denominations as being legitimately LDS although having some doctrinal differences. They despise the LDS who are still polygamists. They act like they despise polygamy yet they named their flagship and most prestigious university after the biggest polygamist in the history of all the LDS denominations.

And somehow all that irony escapes them.
 
Upvote 0

Sophrosyne

Let Your Light Shine.. Matt 5:16
Jun 21, 2007
163,215
64,198
In God's Amazing Grace
✟910,522.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Huge irony for sure..... to want to be accepted as Christians by Christians yet claim Christians aren't Christians to begin with how does one wrap their mind around that type of convoluted thinking without getting a huge migraine.
 
Upvote 0

Ironhold

Member
Feb 14, 2014
7,625
1,467
✟209,507.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Huge irony for sure..... to want to be accepted as Christians by Christians yet claim Christians aren't Christians to begin with how does one wrap their mind around that type of convoluted thinking without getting a huge migraine.

We don't deny that others are Christian; we just believe that we have a more complete version of everything.
 
Upvote 0

ArmenianJohn

Politically Liberal Christian Fundamentalist
Jan 30, 2013
8,962
5,551
New Jersey (NYC Metro)
✟205,252.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
We don't deny that others are Christian; we just believe that we have a more complete version of everything.
Feel free to point out what you don't agree with in the following quotes of what your prophets and church leaders have said about Christians and Christianity:

 
Upvote 0