Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's also been said that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is Christ's own Church here on the Earth, lead by modern day prophets.It’s been said that the whole Mormon movement is based on the wild delusions of a young man, goaded by occult spirits by which he and his family had become all too familiar.
Don’t be deceived. God’s Word refutes the claims of Mormonism.It's also been said that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is Christ's own Church here on the Earth, lead by modern day prophets.
Frankly, people saying this or that doesn't prove anything (everyone has an view). Rather, if a person wishes to know the Truth for themselves, they should not look to asking man's opinion, but asking the Lord Himself.
FYI: that website incorrect about what LDS beliefs are.Don’t be deceived. God’s Word refutes the claims of Mormonism.
What is Mormonism? What do Mormons believe?
FYI: that website incorrect about what LDS beliefs are.
For example, LDS 100% believe the following: "Clearly, there is only one way to receive salvation and that is to know God and His Son, Jesus (John 17:3). Receiving salvation is not done by works but by faith (Romans 1:17; 3:28). We can receive this gift no matter who we are or what we have done (Romans 3:22). “Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12)."
If you care, I can elaborate more. If you don't, heh that's your choice.
I disagree with that.Those critics of the church making the negative assertion do indeed have the burden of proof on this one.
BTW, I notice the title of the thread now has a blue "LDS" button on it. Does that change anything?
I have relatives who are former RLDS and LDS members and they completely disagree with you about the Mormon doctrine of salvation. My wife who is a former RLDS member sat down one night several years ago and compared the Bible with the Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants after reading a book entitled: "RLDS church: Christian? or Cult?" and her eyes were opened to the truth. The woman who wrote that book (a former member of the RLDS church for over 30 years) also has a website. Mormon doctrine of salvation does not line up with Christian doctrine of salvation.FYI: that website incorrect about what LDS beliefs are.
For example, LDS 100% believe the following: "Clearly, there is only one way to receive salvation and that is to know God and His Son, Jesus (John 17:3). Receiving salvation is not done by works but by faith (Romans 1:17; 3:28). We can receive this gift no matter who we are or what we have done (Romans 3:22). “Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12)."
If you care, I can elaborate more. If you don't, heh that's your choice.
One thing I've noticed is that a lot of Mormons do not fully understand what their church actually teaches. However, this is not unique to Mormons and Mormonism. I see that in most churches to one degree or another. But this is why I've found that often I will be arguing with a Mormon about what Mormons believe because I've studied a particular teaching of their religion that they've really not studied. they've only heard the high level descriptions.I have relatives who are former RLDS and LDS members and they completely disagree with you about the Mormon doctrine of salvation. My wife who is a former RLDS member sat down one night several years ago and compared the Bible with the Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants after reading a book entitled: "RLDS church: Christian? or Cult?" and her eyes were opened to the truth. The woman who wrote that book (a former member of the RLDS church for over 30 years) also has a website. Mormon doctrine of salvation does not line up with Christian doctrine of salvation.
Lifeline Ministries to RLDS » Works Salvation
Do you dispute that your founder and other early leaders believed Christianity was "all wrong", "corrupt", and an "abomination", etc? And that those leaders tried to distance themselves from Christianity? Even the late Gordon Hinckley said the lds and Christianity believe in a different Christ.The full name of the church is "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints".
Do you dispute this?
You're being silly here. RLDS and LDS churches are two very different things. If you want to understand real LDS doctrine, I'm happy to explain it to you. If you want to talk about Christ or hear about my relationship with Him, I'm happy to have that conversation with you. But with all do respect I'm not interested in having you "inform" me about "my" RLDS beliefs.I have relatives who are former RLDS and LDS members and they completely disagree with you about the Mormon doctrine of salvation. My wife who is a former RLDS member sat down one night several years ago and compared the Bible with the Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and Covenants after reading a book entitled: "RLDS church: Christian? or Cult?" and her eyes were opened to the truth. The woman who wrote that book (a former member of the RLDS church for over 30 years) also has a website. Mormon doctrine of salvation does not line up with Christian doctrine of salvation.
Lifeline Ministries to RLDS » Works Salvation
Nice try. It was a foundational element to your religion, right out of your own scriptures. Changing "white" to "pure" doesn't change that fact. Neither does some declaration in 1980 take away the previous 150 years of practice.No, and in fact that was officially and actively rejected circa 1980.
Anyone who tries to use his as an argument against the modern body of the church is merely showing that they're 40 years behind.
Still waiting for some actual proof. Plausibility is not proof.We've been over this before.
Quick links, with there being so much more than this -
Book of Mormon Evidences, Part One: Not Proof, But Indications of Plausibility
Response to the Smithsonian Institute Statement on the Book of Mormon
Book of Mormon Problems: Plants and Animals
Basically, even the Smithsonian had to back down from an assertion about what was or wasn't present after it was proven that they weren't up on the most recent discoveries.
How is this statement not hugely arrogant?One thing I've noticed is that a lot of Mormons do not fully understand what their church actually teaches.
Show us what is incorrect. Name one or two things.FYI: that website incorrect about what LDS beliefs are.
For example, LDS 100% believe the following: "Clearly, there is only one way to receive salvation and that is to know God and His Son, Jesus (John 17:3). Receiving salvation is not done by works but by faith (Romans 1:17; 3:28). We can receive this gift no matter who we are or what we have done (Romans 3:22). “Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12)."
If you care, I can elaborate more. If you don't, heh that's your choice.
Unfortunately, you demonstrate it constantly. See previous post. What you state the lds believe vs. what the lds actually teach, as can be found on lds.org and various official lds publications (i.e, teaching manuals, priesthood manuals, etc.), do not necessarily agree with each other.How is this statement not hugely arrogant?
Should I walk into a Baptist church and tell everyone there that I know what Baptists believe better than Baptists? Or tell a Methodists "well, you don't really believe that. Here's what you really believe..." Oh yeah, and don't forget do this all while saying "I'm the real Christian here, you should be just like me".
No. Just no.
Sorry. I point a finger at myself when I say that. This is why I said it about Christian churches as well. And I have personally left churches because I thought they taught one thing but when we got into the details, I realized we disagreed.How is this statement not hugely arrogant?
I apologize-- I was wrong to have gotten on your case. I jumped in anger and old "here we go again" and misunderstood what you were saying (which was actually very fair and perspective). Again, my apologies.Sorry. I point a finger at myself when I say that. This is why I said it about Christian churches as well. And I have personally left churches because I thought they taught one thing but when we got into the details, I realized we disagreed.
I was really describing the human condition, as opposed to trying to point a finger at anyone specifically.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?