Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is a look at the actual court filing. If you don’t have time I understand but you have evidence in front of you that you don’t have time to watch. Oh well!One hour 40 minutes. I don’t have time to listen to this. Perhaps you could provide a synopsis. If evidence is out there why isn’t it being presented in court?
Yep, some judges are not actually doing their jobs based on the oath they took. Real shocker there.Didn’t you hear Donald Trump yesterday? It’s just needs to be heard “correctly” by better judges. And yes, he was literally “phoning that in”.
And the lasted judge in Pennsylvania, being a Trump appointee.Yep, some judges are not actually doing their jobs based on the oath they took. Real shocker there.
And the lasted judge in Pennsylvania, being a Trump appointee.
Weird.
Even weirder, Trumps lawyers are telling these judges, under oath (speaking of oaths) things like this:
“No sir, we have no evidence of voter fraud”
And
“This is not a fraud case”
Trump Lawyer to Pennsylvania Judge: Nope, I've Got No Evidence of Voter Fraud
Giuliani in Public: ‘It’s a Fraud.’ Giuliani in Court: ‘This Is Not a Fraud Case.’
It’s one thing to claim Judges are not accepting the evidence presented, but why do you believe the lawyers representing Trump are claiming to these judges, again, in a court of law, under oath, under penalty of perjury, they have “no evidence of fraud”?
Whats that about?
Why would Trumps own lawyers lie under oath?
Amazing. And some people want this man to remain as our president.Didn’t you hear Donald Trump yesterday? It’s just needs to be heard “correctly” by better judges. And yes, he was literally “phoning that in”.
No, I don't have evidence in front of me. If there were evidence it would be presented in court.This is a look at the actual court filing. If you don’t have time I understand but you have evidence in front of you that you don’t have time to watch. Oh well!
But the judges are doing their jobs. Our president, on the other hand, is not. Very sad.Yep, some judges are not actually doing their jobs based on the oath they took. Real shocker there.
Why do you think trumps lawyers are lying under oath, telling these judges “we have no evidence of fraud”?. No more weird than Roberts a Republican appointment flipping.
Can you understand destruction of evidence. Missing Zip drives, thrown away envelopes, no bipartisan observation of vote counts (in the same room out of sight does not count)and on and on. Unfolded pristine ballots, ballots not matching voter roll numbers, a physically impossible amount of votes entered into voting machines beyond its ability to physically count that number. I am amazed at the unconcern fir a truly free and fair election and on and onWhy do you think trumps lawyers are lying under oath, telling these judges “we have no evidence of fraud”?
what is that about?
or do you believe trumps lawyers are telling these judges the truth when they say “no sir we have no evidence of fraud?”
either they are lying under oath or telling the truth.
Which do you say it is?
So is this your way of stating that your position is that trumps lawyers are indeed telling the truth under oath when they say “no sir, we have no evidence of fraud”?Can you understand destruction of evidence. Missing Zip drives, thrown away envelopes, no bipartisan observation of vote counts (in the same room out of sight does not count)and on and on. Unfolded pristine ballots, ballots not matching voter roll numbers, a physically impossible amount of votes entered into voting machines beyond its ability to physically count that number. I am amazed at the unconcern fir a truly free and fair election and on and on
No I was just resounding to you. I haven’t heard them say that. I am sure you can provide a video clip.?So is this your way of stating that your position is that trumps lawyers are indeed telling the truth under oath when they say “no sir, we have no evidence of fraud”?
So you have no response to those points???So is this your way of stating that your position is that trumps lawyers are indeed telling the truth under oath when they say “no sir, we have no evidence of fraud”?
Except no evidence of this has been presented to the courts. Where is the proof?Can you understand destruction of evidence. Missing Zip drives, thrown away envelopes, no bipartisan observation of vote counts (in the same room out of sight does not count)and on and on. Unfolded pristine ballots, ballots not matching voter roll numbers, a physically impossible amount of votes entered into voting machines beyond its ability to physically count that number. I am amazed at the unconcern fir a truly free and fair election and on and on
If these “dozen compelling allegations” are true, why have they not been submitted as evidence?A dozen compelling allegations of voting irregularities in 2020 election Let’s hear some well reasoned rational explanations for these issues. I won’t hold my breath.
News reports were provided by parousia in post 523.No I was just resounding to you. I haven’t heard them say that. I am sure you can provide a video clip.?
I am amazed at the unconcern fir a truly free and fair election and on and on
See you didn’t have time to look at the evidence in the court filing. They have been submitted and not yet ruled on in these cases filed by Sidney Powell. You do not want see evidence you want to close your eyes and repeat over and over again there is none,If these “dozen compelling allegations” are true, why have they not been submitted as evidence?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?