Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The church teaches that God uses grace to move or orient man's will toward Himself, but never overrides it to do so, because to the greatest extent possible He wants our own willingness to be involved, the choice between good and evil to be ours. And this is because man's justice or righteousness is directly related to his participation or cooperation in moving the will towards rectitude, again, in his own willingness to do right despite the attraction of opposing desires. Without that willingness, he will have no righteousness.God works in the disposition--the locus of preference, likes--which governs the will.
He gives some to prefer the things of God, and then they freely and willingly give up their rebellion and receive the things of God.
God does not violate man's free will--the ability (power) to choose what one prefers without external force or constraint--he uses it to draw men to himself.
And therefore insures that it is.The church teaches that God uses grace to move or orient man's will toward Himself, but never overrides it to do so, because to the greats extent possible
He wants our own willingness to be involved,
And if one is choosing what one prefers in choosing the good, the choice is most definitely his and no one else's.the choice between good and evil to be ours.
And God insures man's own personal willingness (without external force or constraint, but by preference) to do right.And this is because man's justice or righteousness is directly related to his participation or cooperation in moving the will towards rectitude, again, in his own willingness to do right despite the attraction of opposing desires. Without that willingness, he will have no righteousness.
Sorry I don't understand how your comment relates to what I was saying about Calvin and Calvinism or Jesus being the reason for the Bible, can you elaborate a bit more?
And if God does all the preferring such that man has no choice but to choose rightly, or choose wrongly, then justice is thrown out the door all together. The mess we find in this world with the beheadings and the Holocaust and rape and torture and genocide let alone common lies and slander and embezzlement could have all just been avoided because God could've determined our choices for us to begin with, placing a portion in heaven and the rest in hell if that's what He ends up with anyway. Instead, it's a two-way street, for His purposes and according to His wisdom. Again, the very concept of justice is rendered meaningless otherwise.And if one is choosing what one prefers in choosing the good, the choice is most definitely his and no one else's.
And if one is choosing what one prefers in choosing the good, the choice is most definitely his and no one else's.
And God insures man's own personal willingness (without external force or constraint, but by preference) to do right.
Except for "the other half of the story."No, that would be like saying that He ensured that Adam wouldn't eat of the forbidden because He wanted him not to do so
Exactly, He leaves the ultimate choice up to us.Except for "the other half of the story."
He does not insure all for everyone.
He does not insure preference for the things of God in all (1 Corinthians 2:14).
And he did not insure Adam's obedience.
Mid-Acts dispensationalism misinterprets Galatians 2:7, “I [Paul] had been entrusted with the task of preaching the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been to the circumcised.” The mid-Acts dispensationalist makes a distinction between a “gospel of circumcision,” taught by Peter, and a “gospel of uncircumcision,” taught by Paul. In reality, Paul is referring to different audiences, not different gospels. The Jews whom Peter ministered to were saved by grace through faith, just as the Gentiles to whom Paul ministered.
What is mid-Acts dispensationalism? What is the Grace Movement, and is it biblical? | GotQuestions.org
Only one Christian concept involves justice--justification through faith in the person and atoning work (blood--Romans 3:25) of Jesus Christ for the remission of one's sin and right standing (position) with God's justice i.e., "not guilty," righteous, sanctified.And if God does all the preferring such that man has no choice but to choose rightly, or choose wrongly, then justice is thrown out the door all together. The mess we find in this world with the beheadings and the Holocaust and rape and torture and genocide let alone common lies and slander and embezzlement could have all just been avoided because God could've determined our choices for us to begin with, placing a portion in heaven and the rest in hell if that's what He ends up with anyway. Instead, it's a two-way street, for His purposes and according to His wisdom. Again, the very concept of justice is rendered meaningless otherwise.
Bad translation.Esaias 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; behold, a virgin shall conceive in the womb, and shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name Emmanuel. 15 Butter and honey shall he eat, before he knows either to prefer evil or choose the good.
The supposed ability of Jesus "to sin" has nothing to do with original sin.This cancels the theory of original sin, because Jesus was able to sin.
Galatians 2:7-9 Romans 15:8 Matthew 26:13 say there are two different gospels.
The first scripture I understand to mean Peter was sent to preach the Gospel to the Jews mainly, and Paul to the Gentiles mainly.
The first scripture I understand to mean Peter was sent to preach the Gospel to the Jews mainly, and Paul to the Gentiles mainly. One Gospel is preached to both groups, not two different gospels. The last verse I don't see as having any relevance to the question.
Here is the same scripture in the NIV.
Bible Gateway passage: Galatians 2:7-9 - New International Version
7 On the contrary, they recognized that I had been entrusted with the task of preaching the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been to the circumcised. 8 For God, who was at work in Peter as an apostle to the circumcised, was also at work in me as an apostle to the Gentiles. 9 James, Cephas and John, those esteemed as pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship when they recognized the grace given to me. They agreed that we should go to the Gentiles, and they to the circumcised.
Verse 8 indicates one God at work in both Peter as apostle to the circumcised and Paul as Apostle to the Gentiles.