• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Jesuits

JimR-OCDS

God Cannot Be Grasped, Except Through Love
Oct 28, 2008
19,636
4,235
The Kingdom of Heaven
Visit site
✟246,141.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
here is an article about how the editor of America Magazine was forced to resigne
not forced by Amercians, but forced by the Vatican in 2005
because of this, and because of the state of Catholic High Schools in the USA (many of which are run by or set up by Jesuits), is why many people view the Jesuits in a less then favorable light

I thought this would be a good thread to talk about the Jesuits
but at the mere hint of criticism we are getting accused of having a "witch hunt"


http://www.nationalcatholicreporter.org/update/bn050605.htm

OK, reading that article and others about Fr Reese, who is a senior analyst with NCR, there is no evidence that he was forced to resign. No names and no letters from the Vatican stating such.

So, who knows.

Either way, the Magazine is still a top Catholic Magazine.

Jim
 
Upvote 0

AHH who-stole-my-name

in accordance with Christ
Jul 29, 2011
4,218
1,627
✟35,317.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Exactly. Rhamiel's link for instance. I did not know that but I joined the RCC in 2004 so I guess that was not on my radar then.
Knowledge is the best security against uncertainty, which is the Devils playground. Insecurity turns to fear and fear into hate. Love gets pushed out by that hatred and fear is rekindled to produce yet another generation of lost people looking for something beyond themselves.
 
Upvote 0

paul becke

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 12, 2003
4,012
814
84
Edinburgh, Scotland.
✟227,714.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Politics
UK-Labour
here is an article about how the editor of America Magazine was forced to resigne
not forced by Amercians, but forced by the Vatican in 2005
because of this, and because of the state of Catholic High Schools in the USA (many of which are run by or set up by Jesuits), is why many people view the Jesuits in a less then favorable light

I thought this would be a good thread to talk about the Jesuits
but at the mere hint of criticism we are getting accused of having a "witch hunt"


http://www.nationalcatholicreporter.org/update/bn050605.htm

Well, I don't think there can be the least doubt that they have had had their share of wildly popular, prolifically-published desperadoes of the gnostic persuasion and in scripture scholarship, but on the whole I can understand why many of us lament the uncomprehending distaste for social justice of the general run of traditionalists among the laity; Rerum Novarum seemed an incisive analysis and condemnation of the unjust economic structures underpinning Western capitalism, but remained an esoteric oddity, as Encyclicals tend to do. Otherwise that Pope would surely have go the Helder Camara / Liberation Theology treatment by our perjurious mainstream media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: S.ilvio
Upvote 0

Rhamiel

Member of the Round Table
Nov 11, 2006
41,182
9,432
ohio
✟256,121.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
but on the whole I can understand why many of us lament the uncomprehending distaste for social justice of the general run of traditionalists among the laity

huh?

social justice?

not sure why you are bringing that up
my complaint was not that they promoted social justice, which is something all Catholics should support
but that many articles posted in that magazine went against Church teaching

is it that they support your view of Social Justice that you are willing to over look unorthodoxy?

why do you feel the need to attack others when anyone questions the Jesuits?
if they are as great as you claim they are, they should be able to stand on their own merits instead of you just lashing out at everyone who brings up their failings


I had a positive view of the Jesuits
lol I did not think they were immaculate
but I had a very respectful view
but seeing how no one is able to say something good about them without throwing venom on everyone else around them
it really makes me question the type of people who support the Jesuits.......
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michie
Upvote 0

S.ilvio

Newbie
Jul 16, 2011
40,529
3,984
Dublin
✟362,433.00
Country
Ireland
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
huh?


but seeing how no one is able to say something good about them without throwing venom on everyone else around them
it really makes me question the type of people who support the Jesuits.......

We're all Marxist anarchists, hellbent on corrupting you, your faith and the Church. We're out to get you so run, while you still can!!!

Seriously, this is going Looney Tunes now. While the good Jesuits will continue to educate our children, instill a sense of responsibility into them for the poor and dispossessed (remember them?), be the guardians of the Faith despite the constant attacks from many quarters and our Jesuit Pope will lead us in faith and humility to a better place, in God's Will...
 
  • Like
Reactions: paul becke
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
41,542
16,668
Fort Smith
✟1,416,475.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0

paul becke

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 12, 2003
4,012
814
84
Edinburgh, Scotland.
✟227,714.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Politics
UK-Labour
huh?

social justice?

not sure why you are bringing that up
my complaint was not that they promoted social justice, which is something all Catholics should support
but that many articles posted in that magazine went against Church teaching

is it that they support your view of Social Justice that you are willing to over look unorthodoxy?

why do you feel the need to attack others when anyone questions the Jesuits?
if they are as great as you claim they are, they should be able to stand on their own merits instead of you just lashing out at everyone who brings up their failings


I had a positive view of the Jesuits
lol I did not think they were immaculate
but I had a very respectful view
but seeing how no one is able to say something good about them without throwing venom on everyone else around them
it really makes me question the type of people who support the Jesuits.......
 
Upvote 0

paul becke

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 12, 2003
4,012
814
84
Edinburgh, Scotland.
✟227,714.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Politics
UK-Labour
You seem to be answering someone else's post that I haven't even seen on here, Rhamiel ! I haven't felt the need to gainsay, never mind lash out, at any post praising the Jesuits. In fact, I specifically made the point that my personal experience of Jesuits via the community attached to the Sacred Hart Church in Edinburgh has been very positive. I also mentioned that being a very cerebral order, it would be impossible for them and the Dominicans not to have at least their share of wrong uns. But that's the nature of humanity anyway. No group is going to be comprised solely of the virtuous : the wheat and the tares - the eschatological aspect. Having an exceptional analytical intelligence, characteristically worldly, does mean a characteristic deficit in a connatural propensity for faith in comparison with the manual worker.

So, the innumerable truly pious, intellectuals in the hierarchy and the laity are a very precious gift to mankind, having evidently lost little opportunity to grow in love throughout their life, maximizing their ability to promote the physical survival of the more innately spiritual and unworldly manual worker.

With the intellect, I believe there is always a trade-off, and the impression I have is that the optimal balance would tend to be that of the worker at the top of the manual-working hierarchy. Nevertheless, what a debt we all owe to the ultra pious 'brain-boxes', such as Augustine, Ambrose, Chrysostom, as well as, closer to home, physicians, for example, and very occasionally, even government (the greatest of the latter have often tended to have little or no formal faith, though would have subliminally absorbed Christian values in that earlier age, which some of us can still remember. Nevertheless, it was a Methodist lay-preacher, Keir Hardie who founded the British Labour Party, the genesis of the welfare-state, after WWII. That, of course, was before the Labour Party in the UK became became the political wing of Stonewall ! I fear the siege filter has fall over your eyes, Rhamiel.
 
Upvote 0

paul becke

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 12, 2003
4,012
814
84
Edinburgh, Scotland.
✟227,714.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Politics
UK-Labour
if you think the Jesuits are positive, how about you say positive things?

You seem to be answering someone else's post that I haven't even seen on here, Rhamiel ! I haven't felt the need to gainsay, never mind lash out, at any post praising the Jesuits. In fact, I specifically made the point that my personal experience of Jesuits via the community attached to the Sacred Hart Church in Edinburgh has been very positive. I also mentioned that being a very cerebral order, it would be impossible for them and the Dominicans not to have at least their share of wrong uns. But that's the nature of humanity anyway. No group is going to be comprised solely of the virtuous : the wheat and the tares - the eschatological aspect. Having an exceptional analytical intelligence, characteristically worldly, does mean a characteristic deficit in a connatural propensity for faith in comparison with the manual worker.

So, the innumerable truly pious, intellectuals in the hierarchy and the laity are a very precious gift to mankind, having evidently lost little opportunity to grow in love throughout their life, maximizing their ability to promote the physical survival of the more innately spiritual and unworldly manual worker.

With the intellect, I believe there is always a trade-off, and the impression I have is that the optimal balance would tend to be that of the worker at the top of the manual-working hierarchy. Nevertheless, what a debt we all owe to the ultra pious 'brain-boxes', such as Augustine, Ambrose, Chrysostom, as well as, closer to home, physicians, for example, and very occasionally, even government (the greatest of the latter have often tended to have little or no formal faith, though would have subliminally absorbed Christian values in that earlier age, which some of us can still remember. Nevertheless, it was a Methodist lay-preacher, Keir Hardie who founded the British Labour Party, the genesis of the welfare-state, after WWII. That, of course, was before the Labour Party in the UK became became the political wing of Stonewall ! I fear the siege filter has fall over your eyes, Rhamiel.

I can only conclude that you are either blind, Rhamiel or have comprehension difficulties, yet clearly neither are the case. I castigate the way in which many cradle Catholics are not willing to see any wrong in the history of the institutional church, as it has deviated further and further from the Gospel, and condemn everything about the Protestant churches, seeing no merits in them at all, never mind merits that were clearly intended by divine Providence to correct imbalances that had been effected in our church.

I will say, however, that while my bafflement at your posts concerning my comments about the Jesuits, stand, I was intending this morning, anyway, to point out in another thread, I believe, that despite my criticisms of the customary Catholic blandishments by the clergy and laity, alike, concerning the demonic wickedness of various actions and derelictions of the church, historically, right up to the present, the patrimony of wisdom bequeathed to us by Christ, the Apostles, the Fathers and the holy men and women down the centuries is unique, unparalleled, completely beyond comparison; and today, at least, since Vatican II, one only has to listen to comments by many of our prelates today to realise how much of that patrimony they have made their own, exhibiting at the same time impressive discernment. The analyses by the Pope, himself - a Jesuit, mark you - of the mindsets of the traditionalist 'bitter-enders', like those Japanese soldiers, emerging from the jungle canopy, blinking in the sunlight, to finally learn the the war is over, are stunningly astute; although our traditionalist friends don't believe them ... instead, speaking ominously of a schism, for all the world as if the Church would be the schismatics .. and they the true church !

Incidentally, two major Jesuit miscreants must have wreaked enormous damage, as a result of their popularity : Karl Rahner, who, in trying to adapt theology to philosophy was trying to make a sow's ear out of a silk purse. And the doyen of scripture scholars, John McKenzie, who, in his dictionary of the Bible, described David as 'little better than a bandit'. I won't comment on that, its so farcical.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

bill5

Well-Known Member
Jul 30, 2011
6,091
2,195
✟70,699.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
why do you feel the need to attack others when anyone questions the Jesuits?
if they are as great as you claim they are, they should be able to stand on their own merits instead of you just lashing out at everyone who brings up their failings

I had a positive view of the Jesuits
lol I did not think they were immaculate
but I had a very respectful view
but seeing how no one is able to say something good about them without throwing venom on everyone else around them
it really makes me question the type of people who support the Jesuits.......
Someone else gets it, thank you.

That said, I'm trying not to let such foolishness tarnish my objectivity towards the Jesuits; after all, nobody on this board is their spokesperson (fortunately for them).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rhamiel
Upvote 0

Andres88

Contributor
Feb 7, 2008
7,499
322
37
Santo Domingo
✟33,648.00
Country
Dominican Republic
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
In the Dominican Republic, priestly formation has three main institutions: the major seminary (diocesan) for both philosophical and theological studies, a Jesuit institution (which has only philosophical studies available), and a Dominican institution (which has only theological studies available).

I'm currently studying Philosophy with the Jesuits; one of my best friends is a Jesuit as well. At least in my country, they tend to be very liberal, but there are a few exceptions. They are mainly involved in social work (immigrants, the poor, etc.), and are not really known for a great spirituality, except for their retreat house.

A lot of the postures assumed by the Jesuits here are often against the communion with the diocesan bishop, and even with the Church teaching in general. Again, there are exceptions, but most of them (here) are too pragmatic and focused on the relief of immediate physical needs than on the caring of the souls, nor do they often propose a healthy balance between the two.
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
152,046
19,735
USA
✟2,066,011.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
ADMIN HAT

This thread has had a clean up of off topic, goading posts. Please stick to the topic an do not post about each other or insult and goad each other. It is okay to have different views, but not attack the other member personally!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rhamiel
Upvote 0