Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Wow. Pot let me introduce you to kettle, kettle this is the pot!Many would even vow Abraham and hagar were not married ,they would rather slander them as Adulterers rather than accept Ismael.
Just as they want to deny anything in the Bbile what so ever that mentions the Coming Of the prophet mohammed (peace be upon him), they would do anything to cut that link between him and Ismael.
Yes Bev, I've been dragged from this beloved forum last friday for our office Christmas party. Looks like I've missed some of the action & a fair bit of reading still.Bevlina said:I see the Original Poster hasn't been back?
The covenant of Abraham had spiritual implications more than it was a physical covenant. Actually I think he established it with Noah in Genesis 6:18 but it could have come through any one of Noah's sons. In Genesis 9:13 God tells Noah more about it, I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant (between me and the earth). God told Abraham it would be through his seed and then He told him which seed it would come through. In 17:2 And I will make my covenant between me and the, and will multiply the exceedingly. Abraham will get the land from the river of Egypt, probably the Nile, to the Euphrates. IIn 17:21 But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year. God has fulfilled his part of the covenant. Jesus Christ is the covenant.Muslim said:So you agree that Ishmael was included in the covenant with Isaac?
Bevlina said:I still say, you muslims would argue with God.
I am trying to tell you that we have the archeological evidence to prove the Bible is the absolute truth. And yet, you will still say the opposite.
As much as Christians want to say we're right and you don't know anything because you're not a Christian, the bible has been corrupted to a certain extent but not near as much as the Muslims claim, unless they just forgot to put it in the concordances. The Koran is saying some of the same things so that part is true but whether the Muslims want to admit it or not the Koran has been corrupted. I don't know about Mohammed but either the Koran has been corrupted or it was corrupted when he got it or the scribes that wrote it corrupted his message. If nothing else they need to believe that Jesus is the son of God and He died and was resurrected. Mohammed possibly was the prophet from God and his message was corrupted. That's from that website posted above and even if it is a Gnostic website they probably knew something anyway.Kris_J said:Having read most of the posts, it seems that I'd much rather have people of no vested interest in whether it was Isaac or Ishmael who was sacrificed.
Is it safe to assume that most of you here believe in an inerrant Bible or Quran? I believe the most credible & balanced view would come from a well versed liberal Christian & Muslim.
Of those who post here: How many sincerely believe that the Quran or Bible that you believe in is not inerrant?
Really? by which criteria did I not fill in your defintion of a Christian? Its true, that I have a high respect for Islam & other non-Christian religions, & do keep an open mind about supposed "Bible Truths". I am curious how did you come to conclude I am not Christian?markie said:As much as Christians want to say we're right and you don't know anything because you're not a Christian,
So you do believe the Bible is inerrant or not?the bible has been corrupted to a certain extent but not near as much as the Muslims claim, unless they just forgot to put it in the concordances.
I suspect that Mohammed's message is as much corrupted as Jesus' message by people trying to do their best, but still just human.The Koran is saying some of the same things so that part is true but whether the Muslims want to admit it or not the Koran has been corrupted. I don't know about Mohammed but either the Koran has been corrupted or it was corrupted when he got it or the scribes that wrote it corrupted his message. If nothing else they need to believe that Jesus is the son of God and He died and was resurrected. Mohammed possibly was the prophet from God and his message was corrupted. That's from that website posted above and even if it is a Gnostic website they probably knew something anyway.
Good thing you are honest markie, yes the bible has been corrupted to as certain extent.that extent is enough to prove it can no longer be taken as a source of of reliable reference concerning Jesus and his teaching.As you look in to the bible you see that extent you are talking about gets bigger.Where does it stop. When you see that the word of GOD has been corruputed to an extent do you still use it as a means of Reference, knowing it is no longer a reliable source.So shifting the blame on the Quran does not not malke things any better. It is like a teacher at school tells you that you are not doing good, rather than going to learn and improve you tell the teacher he is no good.pepoel will go round and round in circles to disprove of any bbile corruption what so ever rather thatn go and look into it.Those who look saw it and found the truth.Why deny yourself the truth.markie said:As much as Christians want to say we're right and you don't know anything because you're not a Christian, the bible has been corrupted to a certain extent but not near as much as the Muslims claim, unless they just forgot to put it in the concordances. The Koran is saying some of the same things so that part is true but whether the Muslims want to admit it or not the Koran has been corrupted. I don't know about Mohammed but either the Koran has been corrupted or it was corrupted when he got it or the scribes that wrote it corrupted his message. If nothing else they need to believe that Jesus is the son of God and He died and was resurrected. Mohammed possibly was the prophet from God and his message was corrupted. That's from that website posted above and even if it is a Gnostic website they probably knew something anyway.
I think it was the people of Mecca who changed your book. The pagans changed the Koran. Either that or his message was copied down wrong if in fact he was a prophet.Muslim said:God gave the revelation to the Jews, but the Jews betrayed their convenant with God and slayed the prophets and changed the words written in their scriptures. That does not mean that God could not have stopped them. God let them do this because he was going to safeguard the Quran.
*Cough* Not far from what Mormon's used to believe that having dark skin was as the mark Cain.The reason the Muslims here seem so obstinate is because they are descendant from Ishmael.
At last they let the cat out of the bag, he admits that all other prophets came out of the Jews one only from the Muslims.This is the core of their hatredfor the prophet mohammed why he was not from them.Even aboo Jahl accepted that had he been from the smae clan as the prpohet mohamed(peace be upon him ) he would have accepted him. So the Jealousy stems from there that he was sent to the Arabs and niot the Jews.Allah says in the Quran that he sent to every nation a prophet. So what the fuss about sent a prophet to Arabia. The Arab pagans and Jews and Christians were in darkness and GOD sent them light.Montalban said:The reason the Muslims here seem so obstinate is because they are descendant from Ishmael. They need to show why the mantle of prophethood has been passed to them, by retrospectively propping up the claim of Ishamel.
According to pp23-24 of my Islamic Catechism* there are 25 prophets recognised by Islam;**
1. Adam
2. Idris (apparently Enoch)
3. Noah
4. Hud (??)***
5. Salih (??)
6. Abraham
7. Lot
8. Ismael
9. Isaac
10. Jacob
11. Joseph
12. Job
13. Shu'ayb (apparently Jethro)
14. Moses
15. Aron
16. David
17. Solomon
18. Ellias
19. Elisha
20. Jonah
21. Ezekiel
22. Zachariah
23. John the Baptist
24. Jesus
and
25. Muhammed.
So they establish Ishmael as a 'prophet' so that Arabs are descendant of a 'prophet'. The problem with this, is that al-lah obviously didn't recognise any convenant with the Arabs, because prophets 9 through to 24 he kepts sending to the Jews! (that is until out of the blue, the Arabs of Mecca-Medina who had nothing to do with Judaism, suddenly get #25 the 'best' and greatest prophet !?!?
If there was a convenant with the Arabs (and they obviously didn't follow his message - or else Muhammed would not have been needed), then why didn't al-lah send anyone to the Arabs? It sounds a bit like the Mormons trying to account for 'lost tribes' and so on.
*Memet Soymen, (trans. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu) (1991), "Consice Islamic Catechism", The Directorate of Religious Affairs; Turkey
**some names may vary as the publication I have was printed in Turkey.
***Everytime I look up Prophet Hud there's mention of Prophet Nuh, where he fits into this I don't yet know.
Montalban said:The reason the Muslims here seem so obstinate is because they are descendant from Ishmael. They need to show why the mantle of prophethood has been passed to them, by retrospectively propping up the claim of Ishamel.
According to pp23-24 of my Islamic Catechism* there are 25 prophets recognised by Islam;**
1. Adam
2. Idris (apparently Enoch)
3. Noah
4. Hud (??)***
5. Salih (??)
6. Abraham
7. Lot
8. Ismael
9. Isaac
10. Jacob
11. Joseph
12. Job
13. Shu'ayb (apparently Jethro)
14. Moses
15. Aron
16. David
17. Solomon
18. Ellias
19. Elisha
20. Jonah
21. Ezekiel
22. Zachariah
23. John the Baptist
24. Jesus
and
25. Muhammed.
So they establish Ishmael as a 'prophet' so that Arabs are descendant of a 'prophet'. The problem with this, is that al-lah obviously didn't recognise any convenant with the Arabs, because prophets 9 through to 24 he kepts sending to the Jews! (that is until out of the blue, the Arabs of Mecca-Medina who had nothing to do with Judaism, suddenly get #25 the 'best' and greatest prophet !?!?
If there was a convenant with the Arabs (and they obviously didn't follow his message - or else Muhammed would not have been needed), then why didn't al-lah send anyone to the Arabs? It sounds a bit like the Mormons trying to account for 'lost tribes' and so on.
*Memet Soymen, (trans. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu) (1991), "Consice Islamic Catechism", The Directorate of Religious Affairs; Turkey
**some names may vary as the publication I have was printed in Turkey.
***Everytime I look up Prophet Hud there's mention of Prophet Nuh, where he fits into this I don't yet know.
Amazing what mormons and muslims share in common actually.Kris_J said:*Cough* Not far from what Mormon's used to believe that having dark skin was as the mark Cain.
Kris_J said:*Cough* Not far from what Mormon's used to believe that having dark skin was as the mark Cain.
Is it your intent to spam the thread with distortion? I said according to my Islamic Catechism. I am not a Muslim, I am putting forward what YOU claim. The rest of your post re: jealousy is some kind of weird projection.saiful-Islam-Khattab said:At last they let the cat out of the bag, he admits that all other prophets came out of the Jews one only from the Muslims.This is the core of their hatredfor the prophet mohammed why he was not from them.Even aboo Jahl accepted that had he been from the smae clan as the prpohet mohamed(peace be upon him ) he would have accepted him. So the Jealousy stems from there that he was sent to the Arabs and niot the Jews.Allah says in the Quran that he sent to every nation a prophet. So what the fuss about sent a prophet to Arabia. The Arab pagans and Jews and Christians were in darkness and GOD sent them light.
Really? What else do you think they have in common?Bevlina said:Amazing what mormons and muslims share in common actually.
Think what you like if it pleases you to believe about hereditary Muslim stubborness - BTW that must mean that at least one of your ancestors was a Muslim, since you are so stubborn as to not agree with me.Montalban said:Once again your comments are astounding. So what? That you can bring up a number of mistaken beliefs does not negate a mistaken belief. It's not like maths (a negative and a negative)
They don't Islam is the Religion of the one true GOD period! Mormonism is an ISM, Islam is a way of life more than a religion.Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world and MormonISM does not come anywhere near that.may be only resemblence is the belief in polygamy that is all. there is no comparison between Islam and any other religionBevlina said:Amazing what mormons and muslims share in common actually.
What convenant? (See Appendix)Muslim said:Because the covenant with the Arabs was not to be fulfilled until the arrival of the prophet Muhammad.
Do you read your posts to see if they make sense? A covenant fulfulled by Jesus is a covenant fulfilled by Jesus. You can't say 'the covnenatn is fufilled, but here comes covenant mk2"Muslim said:God had promised that he would fulfill his covenant with both the decendents of Isaac and the decendents of Ismael. The covenant with the decendents of Isaac was fulfilled first through the Children of Israel. They received many prophets but after a while they began to turn away from the straight path. They took to doing all sorts of evil and began slaying their prophets as well. So God sent Jesus as the final messenger to them to bring them to the straight path but they rejected him as well and tried to slay him.
What covenant? WHy are you back to Muhammed being an example for all mankind? Will you keep to a story?Muslim said:So God then fulfilled his covenant with the decendents of Ismael by sending the prophet Muhammad, but the difference is that while the prophet Muhammad was decended from Ismael, he was sent to all of mankind.
How did they 'know' this when you calim that the Old Testament has been so distorted so as not to claim that the prophet will be from Ishamel. You really really really need to check your posts before you contradict your own beliefs.Muslim said:The main reason why the jews of Arabia did not accept the prophet Muhammad is because he was not from them. They knew that he would be of Ismael's offpsring but once he arrived they could not take it upon themselves to believe in him due to him being Arab.
The one's that are corrupted so as not to mention Muhammed?Muslim said:Amongst the citizens of Mecca were several Jews, one of whom was knowledgeable of the scriptures.
So?Muslim said:Chapter 5, Verses 70. We took the covenant of the Children of Israel and sent them apostles, every time, there came to them an apostle with what they themselves desired not - some (of these) they called impostors, and some they (go so far as to) slay.
So? All you are doing is confirming by your own beliefs that al-lah made a convenant with the Jews.Muslim said:71. They thought there would be no trial (or punishment); so they became blind and deaf; yet Allah (in mercy) turned to them; yet again many of them became blind and deaf. But Allah sees well all that they do.
So, in summary your argument is this....Muslim said:Chapter 3, Verses 183. They (also) said: "(Allah) took our promise not to believe in an apostle unless He showed us a sacrifice consumed by Fire (From heaven)." Say: "There came to you apostles before me, with clear Signs and even with what ye ask for: why then did ye slay them, if ye speak the truth?"
184. Then if they reject thee, so were rejected apostles before thee, who came with Clear Signs, Books of dark prophecies, and the Book of Enlightenment.
Chapter 4, Verse 155. (They have incurred divine displeasure): In that they broke their covenant; that they rejected the signs of Allah. that they slew the Messengers in defiance of right; that they said, "Our hearts are the wrappings (which preserve Allah.s Word; We need no more)";- Nay, Allah hath set the seal on their hearts for their blasphemy, and little is it they believe;-
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?