Is YEC science? Is is even really a theory?

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

There was a time when the Ten Commandments were welcomed ... and placed ... on our courthouse lawns.

Until science eroded our morals, and the tares started demanding equal airtime for false gods.

The next step, of course, was to just take the Ten Commandments down and make it illegal to post them.

Do you think it's just coincidental that other countries -- that DON'T HAVE -- the separation of church and state clause in their constitutions don't have the Ten Commandments posted on their courthouse lawns?

Satan doesn't want to see these Ten Commandments out in public view.

So nations not founded on Christian principles don't need to appeal to an act of Congress to have them removed.

You really don't know what science is, do you?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

It hurts to see science as it is today, doesn't it?

Full of tares.

You're definitely a tare.

A tare-ible story teller.

Best pun I've ever made.

 

[AV1611VET]

You really don't know what science is, do you?

Should I?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Should I?

If you're going to blame every single jot and tittle of a problem in America and the world on it, definitely.

 

[AV1611VET]

You're definitely a tare.

A tare-ible story teller.

Best pun I've ever made.

Okay, that was funny.

For about a second.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Okay, that was funny.

For about a second.

That's how I feel about so many of your posts, so don't worry, the feeling is mutual.

 

[AV1611VET]

If you're going to blame every single jot and tittle of a problem in America and the world on it, definitely.

There's an infrastructure on this planet that you've closed your eyes to.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

There's an infrastructure on this planet that you've closed your eyes to.

And if you have nothing else, just go right into conspiracy theory territory.

Classic.

 

[driewerf]

There was a time when the Ten Commandments were welcomed ... and placed ... on our courthouse lawns.

Until science eroded our morals, and the tares started demanding equal airtime for false gods.

The next step, of course, was to just take the Ten Commandments down and make it illegal to post them.

Do you think it's just coincidental that other countries -- that DON'T HAVE -- the separation of church and state clause in their constitutions don't have the Ten Commandments posted on their courthouse lawns?

Satan doesn't want to see these Ten Commandments out in public view.

So nations not founded on Christian principles don't need to appeal to an act of Congress to have them removed.

Do you have the ten commandments on display at you front door? Do you have a nativity scene in your front garden? Do you have christian bumper sticker on your car? These are all legal, public and neither Satan, scientists nor the Supreme Court can't do anything about it. The Supreme Court will even confirm your right to display this per the same First Amendment that forbids the use of official buildings for displaying religious paraphernalia. You know this. Yet you selectively lament that the second is forbidden (somehow scientists and Satan are to blame) while staying silent about the first that is perfectly legal and guaranteed by the First Ammendment..

 

[Kylie]

Take your pick.

I specifically asked you to do so.

 

[Kylie]

Science can take a hike.

Funny how you never say this when science is telling you something that you want to hear...

 

[AV1611VET]

I specifically asked you to do so.

I gave you an example in Post 1092.

I'm not going to give you another one.

 

[AV1611VET]

Funny how you never say this when science is telling you something that you want to hear...

I wonder why?

Hint:

1. Bible says x, Science says x = go with x
2. Bible says x, Science says y = go with x
3. Bible says x, Science says ø = go with x
4. Bible says ø, Science says x = go with x
5. Bible says ø, Science says ø = free to speculate on your own

Prime Directive: Under no circumstances whatsoever is the Bible to be contradicted.

 

[AV1611VET]

By the way, Kylie:

Happy New Year!

Which came first?

 

[Kylie]

I gave you an example in Post 1092.

I'm not going to give you another one.

You didn't give me a single thing in post 1092, since that was a post written by ME.

if you are talking about post 1091, then you gave an example of what you would call a "gap" (with the cheetah example), but you did NOT give an example of a "dead end."

 

[Kylie]

I wonder why?

Hint:

1. Bible says x, Science says x = go with x
2. Bible says x, Science says y = go with x
3. Bible says x, Science says ø = go with x
4. Bible says ø, Science says x = go with x
5. Bible says ø, Science says ø = free to speculate on your own

Prime Directive: Under no circumstances whatsoever is the Bible to be contradicted.

So you hold your particular text as a higher authority on reality than reality itself?

 

[Kylie]

By the way, Kylie:

Happy New Year!

Which came first?

Which came first out of what?

You gotta provide some options in order for me to be able to answer this question y'know...

 

[AV1611VET]

So you hold your particular text as a higher authority on reality than reality itself?

Yes, if you're talking about reality as you know it.

But there's more to reality than meets your scientific standards.

Much more.

 

[AV1611VET]

Which came first out of what?

You gotta provide some options in order for me to be able to answer this question y'know...

Which came first? the earth completing one revolution around the sun? or the expression: HAPPY NEW YEAR!?

 

[Kylie]

Yes, if you're talking about reality as you know it.

But there's more to reality than meets your scientific standards.

Much more.

Which you are only assuming, since you can't demonstrate it in any way whatsoever.

Which came first? the earth completing one revolution around the sun? or the expression: HAPPY NEW YEAR!?

Really? Is this the level of discussion we're reduced to now?

Can you you at least TRY to stay on topic?