Meh. The whole "I need evidence!" thing. I like evidence/facts to but sometimes you have to realize there are some things bigger that just can't be explained by science. And lets face it, we are just humans. How can we claim to know the answer to everything (aside from 42). Just like when it comes to fossil dating and so on. People say its correct just "because it is!". How do you know that.
the refrain of someone who can't handle people not just swallowing nonsense.
other than a special pleading about the supernatural, what other things are "too big for science" can you name one? thing is, if things you are claiming exist and affect us, we should be able to detect them, which means they can be subject to scientific study, supernatural forces seem to either refuse to be or don't exist to be studied.
either way they pretty much are the same thing.
this is just a cop-out and attack on science for helping to refute your beliefs.
i mean come on, go learn about dating methods please, they have real reasons for why scientists support the methods.
A human who doesn't know everything created a machine that gives us dates based on what we do know. How is that enough to claim it must be right? I've pointed it out before but science has been wrong so many times through history that I don't believe everything it says. The earth isn't flat, lobotomies don't fix people, we CAN fly. When science knows for sure that it knows everything. Then I will believe some of its far fetched ideas.
go read about what supports dating methods please
, dating methods with regards to the earth use isotopes and their halflives to determine the age.
the difference is, science gets more right over time , your religion is always wrong when it comes to observations of reality. scientists never said the earth was flat, people believed it for a long time but scientists never claimed it was.
really? oh okay so you know nothing about lobotomies, they do work in limited cases.
what scientist said we couldn't fly? you are just making stuff up now. considering your lack of knowledge about those "farfetched" ideas, i doubt you would even then, then again this is the typical double-standard of creationists.
Example people say God isn't real because they can't see him, they need to see him to believe hes real. Why with your big bang theory where is the evidence its real? Do you have a picture? A video? Oh wait, you just go by theories and guessing. >.> Science demands evidence but yet lacks evidence for alot of what it says. I've heard that science is now saying darwin's theory may be flawed. Something that scientists said was 100% true. I guess they spoke to soon. ^.^
geez wikipedia could give you the information, there is tons of it, but i doubt you really care.
just because you lack the desire or interest in finding the evidence doesn't mean it doesn't exist, i search for evidence of god, but the only "evidence" is the stuff after i believe already, not before.
uh dude, darwin didn't know about DNA! of course it was flawed, no one uses darwins theory, there is this thing called the "modern synthesis" it replaced darwin's stuff 60 years ago. if you think there is a single scientist who would say a theory is 100% true, then i have beach front property to sell you on the moon.
Lastly, I often hear atheists tell me "Christians can't think outside the box!". Which makes no sense since its the opposite way around. How is believing we were created by nothing/explosion outside the box? Its like saying "I farted because I was gassy!". How is that somehow logical. Its like hearing a really basic answer.
how is believing like the majority of the world is "thinking outside the box" and no one who knows what they are talking about says we were created by nothing, or an explosion.
To me thinking outside the box means to be creative, something that may be not common thinking. Something that is just bigger then you can imagine. The story of Genesis seem to be very outside the box. And really there are some who think the big bang could line up with God creating the universe. After all he did it in a few days times. Of course the only difference is how old the universe is. Another thing that science just guesses on and expects people to believe without actually 100% factual evidence.
i see no thinking here, only you spewing creationist propaganda and fallacious unreasoning.
genesis was not outside the box other than being a polemic against other religions. here is the gist of genesis one: "your gods are stupid, we have one god who created all the stuff you think are gods! worship our god because he made it all! " that was pretty much it, still is.
you have no clue what the evidence is, please educate yourself.
<snip to rest of drivel>
i vote poe, or troll.
no one could pack so much junk creationist propaganda in one post.
