Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Like I said, just giving a response isn't the same as giving an answer. If someone replied "Michael Jordan was the greatest athlete of all time", that doesn't answer the OP, does it?
Likewise with the "answers" given thus far. The "answers" just don't hold up to simple logical scrutiny.
These were Apostles sent out to preach and teach. This is why we see the foundation is Christ and then we have the Aposltes.. For they were sent out. Mary was never chosen to go and preach the Gospel to all the nations.. Mary was not an Apostle. She was a disciple.Yes; but to say this is like acknowledging that we benefit from the epistles of Paul, or the Gospel of John. Because they were filled with the Holy Spirit, we benefit.
HE has always been King, just like HE was always God... I am, that I am,I will be, what i will be... So you saying Mary was always Queen of Heaven?
These were Apostles sent out to preach and teach. This is why we see the foundation is Christ and then we have the Aposltes.. For they were sent out. Mary was never chosen to go and preach the Gospel to all the nations.. Mary was not an Apostle. She was a disciple.
She is not queen of Heaven just because Christ became flesh and dwelt among us..
It's not a matter of "liking" the answer. It's a matter of whether or not that answer stands up to theological scrutiny. None of the "answers" have.Yes it is. You wanted to know what was meant by this statement to you it seems blasphomous.
It was explained to you what was meant by it in it's context.
You just don't like the answer.
Your conclusion is incorrect, if all I want are answers that stand up to theological scrutiny.Just because you aren't getting the response you want doesn't mean it hasn't been answered, addressed etc.
So the only logical conclusion is the fact You really weren't inquiring to find out what was meant by the statement. Now were you?
She is not queen of Heaven just because Christ became flesh and dwelt among us..
Nope but they were eye witness and wrote thier accounts of what they witnessed.. If you notice Mary did not write of her accounts.Luke and Mark were not of the apostles.
Him being a King is because of who He is. He is the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords. No where is Mary mentioned when it comes to Jesus being King. It is because through Him all things were created.actually I don't know if she is either. She maybe, I just understand the meaning they place behind it.
Like Thekla pointed out in the time of that age when one becomes King the mother becomes Queen. Now was Christ King on both Earth and Heaven when he was in the Flesh on Earth? or only kIng on Earth? That's where this comes into play.
To me that God selected Mary out of all the women in the world says something.
Not until Christ was born here on Earth.
And because of that Mary is his earthly mother and not queen. We do not read anywhere that Heaven has a queen.She is called queen because first, before, Jesus Christ who was born of her was (already) King.
Nope but they were eye witness and wrote thier accounts of what they witnessed.. If you notice Mary did not write of her accounts.
actually I don't know if she is either. She maybe, I just understand the meaning they place behind it.
Like Thekla pointed out in the time of that age when one becomes King the mother becomes Queen. Now was Christ King on both Earth and Heaven when he was in the Flesh on Earth? or only kIng on Earth? That's where this comes into play.
To me that God selected Mary out of all the women in the world says something.
Nope HE has always been King. He might not have been the King of this "Earth", but He was always the King of Heaven.... and Mary you call the Queen of Heaven... making her before Him... (in Heaven)
There would have been no birth if indeed God has not have this planned before the foundation of the world.. Mary was the earthly vessel He chose to bring His plan into fruitation.. Just as all of us that Have Christ in us is Gods will and plan in our life..There would be no such accounts to be written if Mary had not given birth to Jesus Christ. We would still have the like of the OT. The shadow. The shadow of the OT began its fulfillment at the Incarnation of Jesus Christ.
once again.. according to the flesh. Now Jesus was King before Mary was ever even His mother.. Therefore this is why we are to recognize no man according to the flesh. For we do not even recoginze Christ this way.I have explained this, and I not well. I will try again, and let me know where I am not making sense.
In the system I am explaining (of this era and area), there is a man and his parents. The man becomes a king. Only after he becomes a king, can his mother be called "queen". She cannot be called queen until after her son is crowned the king.
Jesus Christ, before His Incarnation, was already "King". Mary could not be referred to as "queen" until after she bore a King.
And because of that Mary is his earthly mother and not queen. We do not read anywhere that Heaven has a queen.
Jesus is King whether or not Mary is His mother.Heaven has a King; in the eastern system I am referring to, the use of the term "queen" attests that Jesus Christ is King.
There would have been no birth if indeed God has not have this planned before the foundation of the world.. Mary was the earthly vessel He chose to bring His plan into fruitation.. Just as all of us that Have Christ in us is Gods will and plan in our life..