- Oct 17, 2009
- 38,818
- 12,133
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
It seems that there are indications of a Black Privilege in our society when black people are allowed to say things that are inflammatory, but are dismissed as only trying to "get a conversation going". If a white person were to say the same thing, it is considered inflammatory or derogatory or even meant to be provocative.
When the black community feels they are "excluded" in some way, then it becomes known very quickly. But if the black community wants to say that lives matter, but only mention that black ones matter, it's seen as ok. If a white person counters with a slogan that is all-inclusive, we see this: https://pjmedia.com/video/guy-brings-all-lives-matter-sign-into-black-neighborhood-gets-beaten-up/
So that's too provocative? If that's the case, then why is it ok for a black person to be provocative by outright calling white people racist? http://host.madison.com/ct/news/loc...cle_008f6162-8c92-11e6-9c6a-476284be4f62.html
I wonder why the university doesn't force this guy to turn his shirt inside out like someone simply wearing a shirt that asserts a constitutional right: http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/05/13/family-sues-after-student-arrested-wearing-nra-t-shirt-school
It seems that wearing a shirt calling an entire group of people "racist" based on nothing more than their skin color is considered to be "getting a conversation" while at the same time, it's inflammatory to wear a shirt that celebrates a freedom all Americans enjoy. So is holding a sign that simply states that ALL lives matter.
Perhaps blacks enjoy priviledges in this country that people of other skin colors do not?
When the black community feels they are "excluded" in some way, then it becomes known very quickly. But if the black community wants to say that lives matter, but only mention that black ones matter, it's seen as ok. If a white person counters with a slogan that is all-inclusive, we see this: https://pjmedia.com/video/guy-brings-all-lives-matter-sign-into-black-neighborhood-gets-beaten-up/
So that's too provocative? If that's the case, then why is it ok for a black person to be provocative by outright calling white people racist? http://host.madison.com/ct/news/loc...cle_008f6162-8c92-11e6-9c6a-476284be4f62.html
I wonder why the university doesn't force this guy to turn his shirt inside out like someone simply wearing a shirt that asserts a constitutional right: http://insider.foxnews.com/2015/05/13/family-sues-after-student-arrested-wearing-nra-t-shirt-school
It seems that wearing a shirt calling an entire group of people "racist" based on nothing more than their skin color is considered to be "getting a conversation" while at the same time, it's inflammatory to wear a shirt that celebrates a freedom all Americans enjoy. So is holding a sign that simply states that ALL lives matter.
Perhaps blacks enjoy priviledges in this country that people of other skin colors do not?