Well, I think perhaps you are right in a way - I don't know your God. The God I know has covered me with His gift of grace. The God I know advised us to forgive one another 70 times 7. So how much more do you think He forgives us? Does that mean that I do whatever I want? No way, not at all. I do seek to know Him more fully, and to love Him as He has loved me. As that relationship grows, it is less likely that I would do things not pleasing to Him. I don't know many (any) people who believe that taking the name of the Lord in vain is *not* a sin. We ALL have sinned and fallen short of the Glory of God, but if we confess our sins - God is faithful and just forgive us and cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
Since perfect people wouldn't need God's forgiveness of their sins, because they wouldn't sin, I guess this verse does not apply to them.
The fact that none of us is perfect does not alleviate the responsibility of elders to be blameless. That's right,
blameless. This is the word Paul uses in his directives to Timothy about bishops and deacons in the church (
1Tim. 3). "Blameless" is sometimes also rendered as "above reproach" or "unrebukeable." It is because this is the high standard to which elders are to be held that they are not to be "novices" in the faith. Must elders be perfect, then? No, that's not humanly possible. But sin must definitely be the rare exception rather than the rule in the life of an elder. And if he should sin - especially before those he leads - he is to be rebuked "before all" if he does not confess and repent of his sin voluntarily (
1Tim. 5:19, 20).
I didnt say that she had to believe what I did, or that she was wrong if she believed otherwise.
Nor did I. Instead, I referred to God's Word. People can ignore what it says if they like but they can't pretend the Bible does not say what it says on this matter.
That's not my place. I did not expect someone else to question my knowledge of God or suggest that I didn't know Him at all. It seems I could say the same about you.
This thread is not for me.
My comments were of the "if the shoe fits, wear it" kind. If you believe my comments do not apply to you, then ignore them.
Considering you don't have any evidence of patterns of behavior or disregard for Christ in the elder, it didn't seem really relevant.
See my last post. Oh, and by the way, I am quite calm. I can't say as I think much of your adolescent responses, but one can't expect gold from every lump of rock one comes across.
So what exactly is your suggestion to correct the issue? Should he sit in a pile of dust and ashes for a few weeks crying out for mercy and forgiveness? Another form of public self-abasement to atone? Maybe he's likened unto a leper and should just spend his time outside the walls of the camp from this point forward?
WHy is this silliness what you suggest? What does the Bible direct us to do in this situation? Do you know? It does offer very specific steps to follow in approaching a brother and an elder in whom sin has been found. Do you know where?
For one, twip was correct in stating her view and its a biblical view. Forgiveness matters to God. Her #71 post is excellent and I could not fault it one bit.
Who has not sinned before? Let them cast the first stone.
Who would have thought Jesus would defend a prostitute. Many people regard prostitutes as filths, especially in those days, they would be stoned.
If you are unable to make a distinction between a prostitute and a church elder, you will be quite incapable of understanding my comments. Never have I suggested that forgiveness is somehow off the table in dealing with a believer who has sinned. But acknowledging God's forgiveness of our sin does not negate Paul's commands to Timothy about the necessary conduct of an elder. You ought also to consider your "cast the first stone" policy in light of
1Corinthians 5!
Selah.