Is the theory of evolution moral and ethical

[Poster0]

Which contradicts your desire to not debate certain people and or your many previous statements that you were done with this thread.

At least I don't contradict common sense reasoning. I'm not the one asserting subjective notions that heliocentrism or round earth theory is impossible to prove. Don't you find that notion to be irrational?

 

[bhsmte]

At least I don't contradict common sense reasoning. I'm not the one asserting subjective notions that heliocentrism or round earth theory is impossible to prove. Don't you find that notion to be irrational?

Read some of your posts over the last 24 hours and get back to us.

 

[Poster0]

Read some of your posts over the last 24 hours and get back to us.

Im perfectly aware of my posts, they dont however change the fact that i am debating people who demonstrate a lack of common sense reasoning when they assert subjective notions that Heliocentrism and round earth theory are impossible to prove. If anything, my posts reflect the irrational fallacies that i am responding to.

 

[bhsmte]

Im perfectly aware of my posts, they dont however change the fact that i am debating people who demonstrate a lack of common sense reasoning when they assert subjective notions that Heliocentrism and round earth theory are impossible to prove. If anything, my posts reflect the irrational fallacies that i am resonding to.

Your posts don't reveal what you think they do, but I understand your desire to think they do.

 

[Poster0]

If you cant prove the earth is round then how can you aspect me to believe that you can prove man evolved from an ape beast millions of years ago? Sure, you claim to have evidence, but I don't consider observing bacteria adapt as evidence of evolution. God created bacteria to adapt, and that's what bacteria do, but its not evolution. Show me evidence that scientists have observed an ape change into a man, inside a laboratory, and I might abandon my faith in Genesis. Till then however, I must conclude that ToE is more speculation rather than serious theory.

 

[Poster0]

Your posts don't reveal what you think they do, but I understand your desire to think they do.

Yes, thank you. Please get back to more evolution and less poster0.

 

[Blue Wren]

Where in the bible does it say that Adam was a prehistoric ape beast who lacked the intelligence that mankind now has? Do you actually believe that ToE has proven their ridiculous assertions about mans origin?

Where does it talk about man, walking on the moon, in the Bible? There are many things, we know about science now, that are not mentioned, in the Bible. Can you answer my question now?

 

[Goonie]

If you cant prove the earth is round then how can you aspect me to believe that you can prove man evolved from an ape beast millions of years ago? Sure, you claim to have evidence, but I don't consider observing bacteria adapt as evidence of evolution. God created bacteria to adapt, and that's what bacteria do, but its not evolution. Show me evidence that scientists have observed an ape change into a man, inside a laboratory, and I might abandon my faith in Genesis. Till then however, I must conclude that ToE is more speculation rather than serious theory.

If scientists observed apes turn into man in a laboratory, they would have disproved evolution. May I suggest studying the theory, before debating it.

 

[Poster0]

Where does it talk about man, walking on the moon, in the Bible? There are many things, we know about science now, that are not mentioned, in the Bible. Can you answer my question now?

Walking on the moon doesn't conflict with the Genesis account of creation, so it doesnt seem relevant to my point.

 

[Poster0]

If scientists observed apes turn into man in a laboratory, they would have disproved evolution. May I suggest studying the theory, before debating it.

THe creature which scientists say man evolved from was an early form of ape.

 

[Poster0]

Its strange that evolutionists will post images of supposed ape bones, which they speculate to be transitional fossils of early man, but then when I suggest that ToE theorizes man came from a prehistoric ape beast, them i'm told that I'm wrong and that I'm stupid, and that I should sit down because I don't know what I'm talking about. lol. Using the term prehistoric ape beast seems accurate, so I reject the criticism against my use of that term.

Surely ToE posters are being subjective and dishonest. ITs no surprise that they would also assert that its impossible to prove the earth is round instead of flat.

 

[Poster0]

These are the experts that I'm supposed to bow to? I should abandon my faith in Genesis based on their subjection notions? PLease, get real.

 

[Armoured]

No, it actually an issue for other reasons as well.

... such as...?

 

[Armoured]

Its strange that evolutionists will post images of supposed ape bones, which they speculate to be transitional fossils of early man, but then when I suggest that ToE theorizes man came from a prehistoric ape beast, them i'm told that I'm wrong and that I'm stupid, and that I should sit down because I don't know what I'm talking about. lol. Using the term prehistoric ape beast seems accurate, so I reject the criticism against my use of that term.

Surely ToE posters are being subjective and dishonest. ITs no surprise that they would also assert that its impossible to prove the earth is round instead of flat.

It is impossible to prove the Earth is round.

Think I'm wrong? Go ahead, "prove" it's round.

 

[Poster0]

... such as...?

It wouldn't matter because I doubt you would grasp what I'm saying. YOu seem to be having a hard time accepting that the world is round instead of flat.

 

[Armoured]

I mean come on, ToE posters have actually asserted that we cannot prove that the earth is round vs flat. Talk about subjective reasoning.

That's inherently OBjective reasoning. Any "proof" you offer that the Earth is round will rest on axiomatic subjective assumptions.

 

[Armoured]

It wouldn't matter because I doubt you would grasp what I'm saying. YOu seem to be having a hard time accepting that the world is round instead of flat.

I never once suggested the Earth isn't round. What I SAID, was that you can't prove it's round. You can, however, gather evidence that supports the theory that it is round.

Maybe this whole discussion wouldn't be so difficult for you if you tried to get away from this false dichotomy about proof.

 

[Poster0]

It is impossible to prove the Earth is round.

Think I'm wrong? Go ahead, "prove" it's round.

Easy, modern aircraft and space craft can easily prove it. Do you think satellites orbit in a flat, square pattern, verses a round one? Do you think that if you fly around the world that you will find the end? Or do you think that you must make two 90 degree turns in order to find the other side of it?

Have you seen any pictures of the earth lately?

 

[Poster0]

I never once suggested the Earth isn't round. What I SAID, was that you can't prove it's round. You an, however, gather evidence that supports the theory that it is round.

See, this is typical subjective nonsense. ITs nothing more than trying to rationalize fallacy.

 

[Armoured]

If you cant prove the earth is round then how can you aspect me to believe that you can prove man evolved from an ape beast millions of years ago? Sure, you claim to have evidence, but I don't consider observing bacteria adapt as evidence of evolution. God created bacteria to adapt, and that's what bacteria do, but its not evolution. Show me evidence that scientists have observed an ape change into a man, inside a laboratory, and I might abandon my faith in Genesis. Till then however, I must conclude that ToE is more speculation rather than serious theory.

As discussed ad nauseam, no one expects you to believe evolution is "proven". It isn't. However, all available evidence supports it, so it makes sense to consider it a fact.