Is the Earth Flat?

[trophy33]

Tell me Mr science man, what have you personally observed that proves The Bible creation descriptions should not be believe literately.​

I do not have to observe things personally. Thats the advantage of society.

For example, I accept the human anatomy, even though I did not open myself to look at it personally.

 

[d taylor]

I do not have to observe things personally. Thats the advantage of society.

For example, I accept the human anatomy, even though I did not open myself to look at it personally.

So basically you believe science over God's word.

 

[trophy33]

So basically you believe science over God's word.

No, I believe the scientific consensus over your personal misunderstanding of the language of the Bible.

 

[d taylor]

No, I believe the scientific consensus over your personal misunderstanding of the language of the Bible.

No i do not misunderstand any creation descriptions, i believe what The Bible states as given. I do believe it is you who misunderstands The Bible or more appropriately, does not believe the creation accounts given.

The account of the 12 spies report in Numbers 13, 14 is a fine example of people believing lies of man over God's word and promises. It is a very good example of most of modern christianity and their approach to The Word of God.

Since you believe in science so much, why not look to science for your approach to eternal life salvation. Surely if science is so correct about God's creation, then obviously they must have better information on salvation also.

 

[trophy33]

No i do not misunderstand any creation descriptions, i believe what The Bible states as given.

You can believe whatever you want, of course.

But if your claims are extraordinary and very controversial, you should have more evidence for them than just believing that the Bible was dictated by God and human writers played no role (which is actually easily debunkable just by comparing Gospels).

 

[trophy33]

Since you believe in science so much, why not look to science for your approach to eternal life salvation. Surely if science is so correct about God's creation, then obviously they must have better information on salvation also.

What scientific approach do you propose regarding eternal life? How would you test it?

 

[d taylor]

What scientific approach do you propose regarding eternal life? How would you test it?

Science is your area.

 

[PIckleRelations]

So basically you believe science over God's word.

After years of seeing hundreds of experiments either reflected or performed by so many sources who put their work online for others to witness, such as Dr. John D, Kyle Adams, Taboo Conspiracy, Globebusters, Jeranism, Witsit, DITRH, p-brane, and just dozens and dozens more, there come a point when you realize that all the science the globe actually has are created images, swirling toilets, and inconclusive stick experiments.

They aren't picking science over God, because there isn't any science there. They are choosing man's opinion only.

 

[trophy33]

Science is your area.

Mine? You mean ours? You are using internet, its science, not magic. You cannot observe electrons and data in optical cables under oceans or from satellites personally, but they are there.

Regarding eternal life and science, I hope you are beginning to understand where you got it wrong - theology cannot be tested scientifically, because its not physical. The physical world we live in can be tested scientifically, because we have physical eyes and bodies that can interact with it.

Edit: English

 

[d taylor]

Mine? You mean ours? You are using internet, its science, not magic. You cannot observe electrons and data in optical cables under oceans or from satellites personally, but they are there.

Regarding eternal life and science, I hope you are beginning to understand where you got it wrong - theology cannot be tested scientifically, because its not physical. The physical world we live in can be tested scientifically, because we have physical eyes and bodies that can interact with it.

Edit: English

No ours to it, you are the one (among others) "because someone has created a computer or shot a rocket up into the air" puts science over The Bible's creations accounts. I can separate out the constructions/inventions (bridge, cars, etc..) made using math, etc.. from the fabricated and outlandish claims of men of science about God's creation.


...Like i said what have you observed of God's creation that will allow you to make that statement or have the belief. That the descriptions given in The Bible are not accurate and truthful descriptions of God's creation.

...I have personally recorded (with a camera) the star jupiter and know it is not like the images (a spherical planet) science portrays the star to be.

Post your video of a Jupiter like the image(below) from science moving across the sky.

​

 

[trophy33]

No ours to it, you are the one (among others) "because someone has created a computer or shot a rocket up into the air" puts science over The Bible's creations accounts. I can separate out the constructions/inventions (bridge, cars, etc..) made using math, etc.. from the fabricated and outlandish claims of men of science about God's creation.


...Like i said what have you observed of God's creation that will allow you to make that statement or have the belief. That the descriptions given in The Bible are not accurate and truthful descriptions of God's creation.

...I have personally recorded (with a camera) the star jupiter and know it is not like the images (a spherical planet) science portrays the star to be.

Post your video of a Jupiter like the image(below) from science moving across the sky.

View attachment 332429

​

I am not your man for taking photos of planets. Please, contact ESA or your NASA for that.

 

[d taylor]

After years of seeing hundreds of experiments either reflected or performed by so many sources who put their work online for others to witness, such as Dr. John D, Kyle Adams, Taboo Conspiracy, Globebusters, Jeranism, Witsit, DITRH, p-brane, and just dozens and dozens more, there come a point when you realize that all the science the globe actually has are created images, swirling toilets, and inconclusive stick experiments.

They aren't picking science over God, because there isn't any science there. They are choosing man's opinion only.

-
​

Right, there are many painted (computer or hand) rendered illusions to feed the ones looking to be deceived.

I remember the Halloween sun, what a fake.

 

[trophy33]

BepiColombo’s final glimpses of Earth

BepiColombo’s final glimpses of Earth

www.esa.int

 

[BNR32FAN]

-
​

Right, there are many painted (computer or hand) rendered illusions to feed the ones looking to be deceived.

I remember the Halloween sun, what a fake.

View attachment 332430​

Lol just because you claim it is fake doesn’t make it so. What does anyone gain from lying about it? NASA would only be discrediting their self by doing so and have nothing to gain as a result of it. You look at the photo and say it’s fake based on absolutely no evidence at all.

 

[BNR32FAN]

Sunsets can’t happen on a flat earth. Flat earthers still can’t produce a flat map of the earth that is to scale, that’s why in their preposterous model Australia is roughly 4 times bigger than Asia which is retarded. And South America is roughly 4 times bigger than North America which is also ridiculous.

 

[PIckleRelations]

Sunsets can’t happen on a flat earth. Flat earthers still can’t produce a flat map of the earth that is to scale, that’s why in their preposterous model Australia is roughly 4 times bigger than Asia which is retarded. And South America is roughly 4 times bigger than North America which is also ridiculous.

It's just a matter of perspective with the sun going away and no longer being viewable, which is perfectly acceptable in the flat earth paradigm. If you are referencing the Gleason map, that's because that map is an azimuthal equidistant map, based on globe projections. That's not to scale for either a globe or a flat earth. It's that way because the globers can't produce a flat map that is to scale.

 

[BNR32FAN]

It's just a matter of perspective with the sun going away and no longer being viewable, which is perfectly acceptable in the flat earth paradigm. If you are referencing the Gleason map, that's because that map is an azimuthal equidistant map, based on globe projections. That's not to scale for either a globe or a flat earth. It's that way because the globers can't produce a flat map that is to scale.

The sun doesn’t go away to where it’s not visible it goes down below the ground. Even at the ocean you can see it go down below the water. That can’t happen on a flat earth.

 

[Hans Blaster]

No ours to it, you are the one (among others) "because someone has created a computer or shot a rocket up into the air" puts science over The Bible's creations accounts. I can separate out the constructions/inventions (bridge, cars, etc..) made using math, etc.. from the fabricated and outlandish claims of men of science about God's creation.


...Like i said what have you observed of God's creation that will allow you to make that statement or have the belief. That the descriptions given in The Bible are not accurate and truthful descriptions of God's creation.

...I have personally recorded (with a camera) the star jupiter and know it is not like the images (a spherical planet) science portrays the star to be.

Post your video of a Jupiter like the image(below) from science moving across the sky.

View attachment 332429

​

Didn't I already deal with this video? It literally demonstrates that the Earth is rotating.

 

[friend of]

It's the centre of the universe!

 

[PIckleRelations]

The sun doesn’t go away to where it’s not visible it goes down below the ground. Even at the ocean you can see it go down below the water. That can’t happen on a flat earth.

You mean like this video where the sun just fades out as it gets farther away?

To answer your pending questions, no, boats don't go over a curve. No, you wouldn't be able to see Paris from Chicago on a flat earth. And no, cats wouldn't have knocked everything off of the edge by now.