• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
5,898
3,324
67
Denver CO
✟240,940.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
As I mentioned before, he didn't tell them to go back to your own country, he said go back, fix it then return and show us how you did it. You guys need to quit taking stuff out of context in order to find racism where it does not exist.
Let's be forthright with one another. You're quoting what Trump said only after trying to amend the original statement of go back to your own country. I believe that it's completely disingenuous. The additional statement that she should go back and fix Somalia and then come back and show us how she did it, is completely unrealistic, and any sane person knows this.

I study semantics and the words are not as important as the sentiment they mean to convey. Even Trump's watered down version is complete hypocrisy and prejudice. Trump's newly devised sentiment is essentially conveying, that as a duly elected representative of the American people, she's not worthy of listening to, until she goes back and fixes her own country first. Respectfully, no matter how he says it, I am not falling for the obvious false premise that justifies his prejudice in his defiled heart and mind, as if this is not her country. Trump's sentiment was hypocritical prejudice on display and there's no way around it.

Moreover, again Trump showed his true colors recently, when he publicly slandered her, by saying that she looks down on hard working Americans as ignorant. He concluded this as true, simply because she forthrightly responded in an interview that she is concerned that there may be an ignorance in the electorate that allows unethical politicians to foment hatred towards refugees through misinformation/disinformation, for political gain. Trump obviously took that personally. Again he displayed his hypocritical prejudice, and the crowd of the blind following the blind chanted, "Send her back!!!… Send her back!!!"
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

GodLovesCats

Well-Known Member
Mar 16, 2019
7,400
1,329
48
Florida
✟125,827.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Wouldn't you say the same about men versus women?

When I was a kid I thought boys are bad people because those who didn't ignore me were mean to me. It was not until high school, when boys are reaching adulthood, that I could start to see them differently. As a woman now, I know to judge each man differently if they are to be judged at all.
 
Upvote 0

Invalidusername

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2018
1,373
662
Battle Creek
✟77,701.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican

Well this is going to shock you but as a boy I thought all women were manipulative and cruel.

Women just sin differently. Men are more physically violent but women can destroy you from the inside. I prefer men's violence because at least my ego is still intact after.
 
Upvote 0

Ken-1122

Newbie
Jan 30, 2011
13,574
1,792
✟233,210.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I'm going by what he said; however I didn't read his original tweet. Did you?
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,276
10,162
✟286,234.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
You jokin' right?
Would you prefer I spoke of slang, or usage, or cant, or argot, or jargon. Any group, having like interests, backgrounds and views, has a vocabulary evolved over time in which those views are embedded. You were unaware of this? Your joking, surely?
 
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,276
10,162
✟286,234.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
I'm going by what he said; however I didn't read his original tweet. Did you?
If you didn't read his original tweet then what makes you think you have the right to pontificate on the matter. Your joking, right?
 
Upvote 0

Sketcher

Born Imperishable
Feb 23, 2004
39,044
9,489
✟421,138.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I can see how the total of what he said can be understood as not racist if he only directed it at Omar. But he folded non-immigrants (Ocasio-Cortez, Tliab, and Pressley) into that too, which is what made it clearly racist. Which is not only sinful on his part, but bad strategy - all three of them have been saying indefensible things, but by stooping to racism to rebuke them, he did them a favor by taking public pressure off them and absorbing it himself. This is a favor that none of them deserve.


I believe he should be called out on it, but pastors have to be careful, as politics are a minefield if you're pastoring a church that has both conservatives and liberals in it. If either side senses a partisan attack from the church leadership, they will complain loudly and/or leave, perhaps also with a resolve to do as much damage as possible to the leaders in question by spreading their twisted side of the story. It's like sexual harrassment logic - your intent doesn't matter, their interpretation does, so give them a wide berth. I have no doubt my pastor would call it out if he didn't have to navigate that minefield. He's called out racism before, and has gotten pushback on it before, mainly because black people and white people will read the exact same news articles and supporting sources and interpret the situation differently.

Now, on this issue specifically, I have seen conservatives call the racism out, and I have called it out, and I don't believe that racism has a true home in truly conservative political thought. But as you can see from this thread (and I have seen it elsewhere), other conservatives are reacting reflexively, denying what Trump said was racist. One has to ask why. Part of the reason I think is that like every other conservative in the US, I am tired of being called racist for every little thing. I have heard from many people on the left that either I am a racist for having positions on the right, or that anyone to the right of them on various issues is racist. I have seen time and again, liberals making up charges of racism out of thin air, as if the more racism they think there is out there, that somehow validates them. And the false charges of racism are used to attack us rather than debate the issues intelligently and respectfully. Since this has happened for years and years (not just 2016), I understand the temptation to automatically dismiss any claim of racism from those on the left now, particularly from Democrats who are in office or seeking re-election, and also from the fringe left, who are just nuts. And I think quite a few conservatives have dismissed it based on that. Cry wolf enough times, and people will ignore you when the wolf actually comes.

And since many churches have many people who have been attacked with lies of racism time and again, pastors have to be careful when calling it out. It's unfortunate and needs to change. I do what I can to be that change.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Ken-1122

Newbie
Jan 30, 2011
13,574
1,792
✟233,210.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Would you prefer I spoke of slang, or usage, or cant, or argot, or jargon. Any group, having like interests, backgrounds and views, has a vocabulary evolved over time in which those views are embedded. You were unaware of this? Your joking, surely?
My bad, I didn’t think you were serious; but obviously you were so I shall respond accordingly.

Racists don’t go around speaking in special code, or some secret language that only other racists can understand, they speak regular english just like everybody else because when they voice their opinions they want to get their message out.
The problem is when people looking to fight racism, become so extreme in their fight that they begin to find racism even where it doesn’t exist! They look for a special code, a special hand shake, a special tattoo, special shoe style, hair style, clothing color, heck; a few weeks ago, Nike released a shoe with a tribute to the Betsy Ross flag. Colin Kaepernick complained that it was offensive because it represented a time when blacks were enslaved in the USA, thus racially offensive, so Nike stopped production.

Had either Colin or Nike actually took time to read an actual US history book, they might have realized that Betsy Ross was a Quaker. The Quakers were abolitionists who fought against slavery during that time. The Underground railroad which was a system in place allowing hundreds of slaves to escape to freedom, would not have have been possible without the help of Quakers. They also taught them to read and write while escorting them to the free states. The accomplishments of the Quakers of that time was a good thing that should be celebrated; instead because this happened 250 years ago, they just assumed everything back then was bad due to their ignorance of the good.

This is the type of problem that occurs when SJW’s become so extreme in their fight for justice that they begin to attack things that are not bad as if they were bad; they assume innocent phrases and language is some special code for racist language and code, and it’s just a matter of time when people begin to take them a little less seriously because of this.
 
Upvote 0

Ken-1122

Newbie
Jan 30, 2011
13,574
1,792
✟233,210.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
If you didn't read his original tweet then what makes you think you have the right to pontificate on the matter. Your joking, right?
I have a right to voice my opinion just like anybody else. If you disagree with what I say due to information that you are aware of that I am not, feel free to refute what I said.
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,276
10,162
✟286,234.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
I have a right to voice my opinion just like anybody else.
Of course, but when it is founded on seriously incomplete information then readers are likely to infer that the opinion was based more on beliefs than facts, especially when relevant information was readily available.

If you disagree with what I say due to information that you are aware of that I am not, feel free to refute what I said.
Others seem to have that in hand, but my argument may emerge when I get round to addressing your other posts on the "coded message" front. (I will say in passing that I find it surprising that someone who can right a coherent series of paragraphs is genuinely unaware that such codes are commonplace. Its almost like you have the literalist standpoint of an evolutionist. [and yes, I am poking you a little, It's a code thing. ])
 
Upvote 0

Strathos

No one important
Dec 11, 2012
12,663
6,532
God's Earth
✟270,796.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
First of all, concerning PoC (people of color) EVERYBODY is a person of color. White is just as much as a color as black, brown, or anything else. Using code words specifically meant to separate one group from the rest is racist in itself.

No it's not. It's just a convenient shorthand to refer to ethnic minorities in America. Discrimination against them exists, whether you acknowledge it or not.


Did he tell those people to 'go back to the countries they came from'?

Saying 'AOC is a liar, incompetent, and has bad policies' is not racist.

Saying 'AOC should go back to the crime-infested country she came from' is.

Polish, and Irish were always considered white. They were attacked because they were foreign.

That is a lie. Being Irish myself, I know this.

How the Irish Became White

No! It means that phrase against those minorities was not racism.

What do you consider to be racism? Nothing short of using racial slurs?
 
Upvote 0

Invalidusername

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2018
1,373
662
Battle Creek
✟77,701.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican

Wrong
 
Upvote 0

GodLovesCats

Well-Known Member
Mar 16, 2019
7,400
1,329
48
Florida
✟125,827.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
No it's not. It's just a convenient shorthand to refer to ethnic minorities in America. Discrimination against them exists, whether you acknowledge it or not.

Ken is correct. Everyone has melanin expect albinos (and there are few such humans). Melainn produces a color. How light or dark you are is determined by how much melanin is produced, right?

"Black" is shorthand for African-American. Count the syllables: Af-ri-can A-mer-i-can.
 
Upvote 0