Is it wrong that I support Iran despite my faith, don’t get me wrong here, I don’t agree with Iran’s Islamic policies, but I’m not on the US’s side on this, and I personally was saddened by the death of Qassem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi Al Muhandis both men who got rid of Isis in Iraq and Syria and allowed the what was left of the Iraqi Christian community to enter Mosul again. I admire Iran’s culture, it’s language and it’s people greatly, I even considered converting to Shi’a Islam from Sunni Islam during my early days of rejecting my family’s religion and for a while tried following Zoroastrianism. Qassem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi Al Muhandis weren't probably nice people, but I’m sure they weren't terrorists, these were two men loved by by their people (or atleast most of their people) and were men responsible for the destruction of Isis in Iraq and Syria, not the US, that’s an unfortunate fact. The US needs to take a hike in my opinion outside of the Middle East, Iran has so far helped us even more then they did.
No it's not wrong to feel the way you do. Everyone is entitled to feel or support anyone they like.
I am against the U.S. in the protracted generational wars in the middle east. I would personally prefer going back to our founding roots of isolationism. It's not like we know what we are doing, and I feel have done more damage than good.
But I do think so long as we are there, by congressional decree, then if we are attacked (and we have spent over a decade being attacked by Iran) then we should respond. I don't think our congress can have it both ways, both be in the middle east and not respond to Iranian aggression.
Due to Suleimani and his forces and operations in Iraq we have lost over 600 military personnel - caused directly by Him and with proof - Congress is critical every single time we (citizens over here) ask to withdraw and won't allow a full withdrawal, but at the same time don't want us to respond when Iranian forces attack us.
They simply can't have it both ways. If we are there we must work to defend ourselves and prevent further loss of life, or we have to leave.
My preference is to leave..
But that's my opinion... yours is slightly different, because loss of American forces mean little to you over there, but my brother served in the U.S. military, and so did my adopted son - He died in Afghanistan while serving in the military there (although my blood son never served because we didn't think it was right as the Iraqi war was just heating up and we didn't feel we could take a chance of him fighting in a conflict we didn't believe was morally right.)
So I do think I see our service men and women as more precious, and think we should act to protect them since our congress wants them there.
But other than that, I probably don't see it very much differently than you. We all have our own opinions, and everyone is entitled to their own.