• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is Everybody going to heaven?

Will everyone go to heaven?

  • Yes: Hell does not exist

  • Yes: Hell does exist but it is not permenant (God will rehab every soul)

  • No:There is a literal hell and those who go there never come back

  • I don't have an opinion / undecided


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Svt4Him

Legend
Site Supporter
Oct 23, 2003
16,711
1,132
54
Visit site
✟98,618.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
You asked a very similar question in post #11 of this thread, and Deborah answered it in post #98.

It would seem we're just rehashing the same things over and over again at this point.


.

As already stated, the response is selective, as there are many who disagree with the belief it's only for a time, and I have shown again and again there are verses that it doesn't make sense to show it as meaning for a time. Dr. V Von Heisensnoot III, the world renown Greek scholar agrees with me. I just throw out that appeal to authority just in case it's needed.
 
Upvote 0

Rajni

☯ Ego ad Eum pertinent ☯
Site Supporter
Dec 26, 2007
8,567
3,943
Visit site
✟1,373,667.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Single
As already stated, the response is selective, as there are many who disagree with the belief it's only for a time, and I have shown again and again there are verses that it doesn't make sense to show it as meaning for a time. Dr. V Von Heisensnoot III, the world renown Greek scholar agrees with me. I just throw out that appeal to authority just in case it's needed.
Since just about anyone can find a scholar that agrees with them, I generally don't use that approach in debates.
Now when the Jewish leaders saw the boldness of Peter and John and found out that they were uneducated and ordinary men, they were amazed and realized that they had been with Jesus. (Acts 4:13)
.
 
Upvote 0
D

DeborahsSong

Guest
And it deserves to be gone over again because her response, and indeed all responses about this, have been selective at best. The reasonings behind the responses have been flimsy and amount to nothing more than a "because I or some guy none of us have ever heard of say so" answer, and yet an entire doctrine is being built on this foundation.

I've been watching this thread, and you're right, there are a lot of areas being gone over time and time again. I think part of the reason is because there is too much on this thread that people don't want to spend a few hours reading it all, but part is because the people asking questing are ending up with answers that just won't hold water.

What's sad is that I don't think those providing these responses are recognizing how flimsy they really are. Reminds me of political-speak, bold words and little substance. There is no 'meat' here to be found here.

Is Marvin Vincent the guy who none of us has ever heard of? If you google his name with Greek, you'll get 3,170 hits. Such as:

Highly respected Greek word studies by Marvin Vincent covering all 27 NT books. Godrules.net is the only free online source for Vincent's on the Web as far ...
www.preceptaustin.org/Greek_to_Me.htm - 180k - Cached - Similar pages

Marvin Vincent's Word Studies has been treasured by generations of pastors and ... language of the New Testament-even if you don't read a word of Greek.
www.buy.com/prod/word-studies-in-the-new-testament-part-four/q/loc/106/31058542.html - 101k - Cached - Similar pages

Or are you referring to Robert Young? Google his name with concordance and there are over 12,000 entries. Surely, you have heard of Young's Analytical Concordance? Both men agree that aion is a temporal term, and does not mean eternity.

Well, for awhile we were discussing specific scriptures and points, but it looks like we're back again to just blanket statements and dismissals. Please give me an example of a flimsy argument concerning aion.

By the way, this doctrine isn't being "built". It was the predominant position of the early church, which knew their Greek, since Koine was to them, what English is in today's world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rajni
Upvote 0
D

DeborahsSong

Guest
As already stated, the response is selective, as there are many who disagree with the belief it's only for a time, and I have shown again and again there are verses that it doesn't make sense to show it as meaning for a time. Dr. V Von Heisensnoot III, the world renown Greek scholar agrees with me. I just throw out that appeal to authority just in case it's needed.

For awhile I thought there was such a person and was going to ask you for the correct spelling, since I wasn't getting any hits in Google!

What is selective about our response? If you use aion/aionous as eternity/eternal, you get absurdities, like "at the beginning of eternity", or "eternity of eternities", or "the sons of this eternity" or "deliver us from this present evil eternity", etc. Whereas, Young's Literal translation can consistently translate aion/aionous as "age"/"age-during" and every verse makes sense.

Would you provide the number of the posts you are referencing, or a specific verse that doesn't make sense?
 
Upvote 0

Svt4Him

Legend
Site Supporter
Oct 23, 2003
16,711
1,132
54
Visit site
✟98,618.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
As posted previously.

I will now quote various passages of Scripture to shew aion or aionios has the definite meaning of "for ever," or "eternal," in English. No one who has examined its use in Greek questions that it is used for life, or the whole period of a man's existence till he breathes his last; nor that it may be used for ages or periods, looked at as a whole. The question is, Does it not properly mean eternal or for ever, and that where age and age-long would have no sense? Thus Matthew 21: 19, of the fig-tree: Let no fruit grow on thee eis ton aiona. "For the age" has no sense. It never was to grow. So Mark 11: 14. That eternity is not grasped by man as a definite idea is true, because definite is finite, and man, being finite, cannot grasp what is in-finite. It is known only as that which is absolutely; or negatively as that to which end is denied.
Again, Mark 3: 29, oik echei aphesin eis ton aiona. What age? It is not in the age, as some have fraudulently translated it, but "has not ever forgiveness." It is not any particular age; the eis allows no such sense, and the ton would require some particular age, which even so would leave no sense to eis. It can only mean here "for ever." There was a present age and age to come, o aion outos, and o aion o mellon, and well known to the Jews, the olem hazeh, and the olem havo; and an increased measure of forgiveness was looked for in Messiah's age. This sin could be forgiven in neither; no additional increase of forgiveness was looked for beyond Messiah; and each measure belonged to its own age; it was not a prolonged process, but what occurred in each as proper to it. But eis ton aiona, can only mean "for ever," though "for ever" may be used metaphorically when there is no withdrawal of the gift or promise, and the effect cannot last longer than that to which it applies. The gift has no limit (it is, as Aristotle says, apeiria), the existence of that to which it applies may. I do not lend it, I give it for ever; yet what I give, or the person to whom it is given, may cease to exist; but the gift is for ever, without repentance, out and out.
128 So John 4: 14, shall not thirst "for the age": is that the meaning? or never? John 6: 51, 58, "live for ever"; John 10: 28, not perish "to the age": is that the sense? John 13: 8, thou shalt not wash my feet "to the age!" A multitude more may be quoted to the same effect; some with the modified sense I have spoken of above of absolute gift and calling never to be retracted. But eis ton aiona never means "to the age" in any case.
Take 1 Peter 1: 23, 25, logou zontos theou kai menontos eis ton aiona. Does it last only "to the age" (applying it to the logon, not to theou as some do)? So verse 25, rema menei eis ton aiona. So 2 John 2, the truth shall be with us "to the age!" So Jude 13, wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness eis ton aiona. Here again "to the age" has no sense.
Quoted from http://www.stempublishing.com/author...NE/31003E.html
 
Upvote 0
D

DeborahsSong

Guest
Matt 21:19 Isn't it more silly to assume the fig tree is going to live forever? Jesus said it would not bear fruit for the age. That age was swiftly coming to an end with Jesus' death and resurrection. Since Passover was about 5 days away, the fig tree quickly withered to meet the deadline.

Mark 11:14 see above

Mark 3:29 Jesus is warning the Jews who don't recognize the move of the Spirit that they "have not forgiveness" and face "age-during" sin (Srong's 265). Under the Mosaic law, blasphemy was a "sin unto death", i.e. a capital offense, hence the destruction of the body was decreed as punishment. They faced this is 70 AD. Note also, Matt 12:32, the parallel passage. Jesus says blasphemy against the H.S. won't be forgiven in this age (aion) or the next. If aion meant "eternity", then you have him saying "in this eternity or the next". Since this sin is not forgiven in the Messianic age, it, too, carries judgment. Obviously, if one speaks evil against the H.S., he's not at the point of accepting Jesus and must face an age or ages of remedial punishment.

John 4:14 Jesus is speaking of the quality of life in the Messianic age, where one's spiritual thirst is satisfied. He also mentions age-during life in this same passage. Jesus even defined it in another passage in John. It is knowing God the Father and JC whom he has sent. It's very clear he was referring to the quality of the Messianic age, not endlessness in his definition. The woman at the well was looking to that age, and Jesus told her what it would be like, and that he is the one.

Since I'm out of time will stop here with a passage from Marvin Vincent:

"Thus, while aionios carries the idea of time, though not of endlessness, there belongs to it also, more or less, a sense of quality. Its character is ethical rather than mathematical. The deepest significance of the life beyond time lies, not in endlessness, but in the moral quality of the aeon into which the life passes."



 
Upvote 0
E

enoch son

Guest
The thead is in error. Some of you are calling Jesus a liar and you don't know it.
1. heaven isn't to come it here now! "The kingdom of heaven is with in you" But wait lord how can this be you haven't died on the cross yet? And I haven't said yes to you?
2. Let alone the fact it say's "You are seated in heavenly places in christ Jesus" It's not talking about the futrue.
 
Upvote 0
E

enoch son

Guest
The main objection I hear to our evangelical/fundamentalist/literalist interpretation of hell is that it is overkill. The idea that God would not only punish the wicked—including the guy who loves his wife and children, works hard, gives to the poor but who has never “accepted Jesus as his personal savior” (i.e., never walked the aisle or raised his hand for salvation like we are supposed to do), right along with Hitler and Stalin—but is going to be tortured endlessly, painfully, night and day, on and on, forever and ever, ages upon ages for something he failed to do in this brief snap of the fingers we call life, simply does not compute with the Apostle John’s repeated statement that “God is love

In a recent discussion with a friend (a believer in Christ, incidentally) who is struggling with the idea of hell, he said to me, “I can understand that love may discipline, even punish, a wrongdoer, but love does not torture them—forever.”

Nothing I said to the contrary was convincing to him and I have to admit, he has made me take another look at the metaphors the Bible uses for hell. At the moment, I am convinced only that hell, whatever and wherever it is, is a horrible place I would not want anyone to be.

~Jim


When you gonna wake up and strengthen the things that remain? ~Bob Dylan, 1979
This is most interesting! I will warn you that because of your place in the body christian will take a outlook of hate at you if you come to the understanding GOD IS LOVE. How dare God love the whole creation of His son? Wait one second He say's that somewhere? John 3;16 I think. Most interesting post! BE WISE!
 
Upvote 0
N

nhislove

Guest
The main objection I hear to our evangelical/fundamentalist/literalist interpretation of hell is that it is overkill. The idea that God would not only punish the wicked—including the guy who loves his wife and children, works hard, gives to the poor but who has never “accepted Jesus as his personal savior” (i.e., never walked the aisle or raised his hand for salvation like we are supposed to do), right along with Hitler and Stalin—but is going to be tortured endlessly, painfully, night and day, on and on, forever and ever, ages upon ages for something he failed to do in this brief snap of the fingers we call life, simply does not compute with the Apostle John’s repeated statement that “God is love

In a recent discussion with a friend (a believer in Christ, incidentally) who is struggling with the idea of hell, he said to me, “I can understand that love may discipline, even punish, a wrongdoer, but love does not torture them—forever.”

Nothing I said to the contrary was convincing to him and I have to admit, he has made me take another look at the metaphors the Bible uses for hell. At the moment, I am convinced only that hell, whatever and wherever it is, is a horrible place I would not want anyone to be.

~Jim


When you gonna wake up and strengthen the things that remain? ~Bob Dylan, 1979

John 3:36
Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life,but whoever rejects the Son will not see the life, for God"s wrath remains on him.
God's only covering from sin is through Jesus and when you don't accept him as savior you are rejecting God. Then nothing will save you from his wrath. We are all without excuse. When standing in front of God at judgement he'll ask this "good family man" why he didn't accept Jesus when he could and the man will say I didn't think it was important enough and God will say well I don't think you're important enough, be gone.

 
Upvote 0
E

enoch son

Guest
John 3:36
Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life,but whoever rejects the Son will not see the life, for God"s wrath remains on him.
God's only covering from sin is through Jesus and when you don't accept him as savior you are rejecting God. Then nothing will save you from his wrath. We are all without excuse. When standing in front of God at judgement he'll ask this "good family man" why he didn't accept Jesus when he could and the man will say I didn't think it was important enough and God will say well I don't think you're important enough, be gone.
So Jesus blood was to small to cover the creation you say?
 
Upvote 0

Rajni

☯ Ego ad Eum pertinent ☯
Site Supporter
Dec 26, 2007
8,567
3,943
Visit site
✟1,373,667.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Single
John 3:36
Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life,but whoever rejects the Son will not see the life, for God"s wrath remains on him.
God's only covering from sin is through Jesus and when you don't accept him as savior you are rejecting God. Then nothing will save you from his wrath. We are all without excuse. When standing in front of God at judgement he'll ask this "good family man" why he didn't accept Jesus when he could and the man will say I didn't think it was important enough and God will say well I don't think you're important enough, be gone.
If a god's ability to save man is only as good as man's ability to accept that salvation, then that god is too small.

.
 
Upvote 0

HumbleServant94

Miami Disciple
Sep 25, 2008
581
23
my house
✟23,347.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
John 3:36
Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life,but whoever rejects the Son will not see the life, for God"s wrath remains on him.
God's only covering from sin is through Jesus and when you don't accept him as savior you are rejecting God. Then nothing will save you from his wrath. We are all without excuse. When standing in front of God at judgement he'll ask this "good family man" why he didn't accept Jesus when he could and the man will say I didn't think it was important enough and God will say well I don't think you're important enough, be gone.

:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::amen:
 
Upvote 0
Dec 18, 2003
7,915
644
✟11,355.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I personally believe that a person has to call upon the Lord to be saved, just as Scripture says. Some might argue...well what if they never heard the Gospel message? The Scriptures say that if you seek God with all your heart you will find Him and that creation testifies to God's existence, so man has no excuse.

I think salvation is available to anyone who wants it. The people who will burn in hell are those who totally reject God and heaven.

I think it is very possible that the lake of fire is a place of anihilation instead of eternal torment. God need not suffer evil to exist eternally.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.