drfeelgood said:lol. You're just like every literalist I've ever met. Throwing pound upon pound of trash on without ever addressing the issue and facts at hand, rather waving them off because they don't agree with your teachings. You test me, as the Pharisees tested Jesus, looking for a loophole. Looking for something to wave to the masses. "Look everybody, Dr. Feelgood made a mistake. This invalidates his entire message". This is evident by your many attempts at confusing the issue with various passages. "Why then, did James say this?" "Why then did Moses permit this?" Do you see the parallel?
Anyways, in James (James was the leader of the head church in Jerusalem), James is addressing a wide variety of people. He's addressing believers and non-believers alike. The rich and the poor. His audience is as diverse as his message.
In the opening verse, which you so handily pointed out, he gives special recognition to his many brothers scattered abroad due to persecution, living in poverty (Romans 15:26). The descendants of the 12 sons of Jacob. He takes the opportunity to greet them with a joy found only twice in the Bible. These "brothers" look to his church in Jerusalem for leadership and guidance.
It's important to note that James is the half-brother of Jesus. His whole life was spent around Jesus, although he did not convert until Jesus' resurrection. Therefore, he knew an awful lot about the teachings of Jesus, and most likely wrote the book of James right around the time that Jesus was preaching the Sermon on the Mount (There are more than a dozen direct parallels to the Sermon on the Mount, and James uses a particular style that Jesus did, that of using examples from nature).
So, now we can establish his audience. At the time of writing, the Gentiles had not been brought into the church yet. Christianity was still limited to Jewish converts. It wasn't until much later that the Apostle Paul embarked on his mission of bringing the Gospel to the Gentiles.
Does this make the message any less applicable to the Gentiles? Certainly not. If the Gentiles were part of the church and thus part of James' audience, James, as leader of the church, would have addressed them too. Therefore, it's only logical to conclude that a well versed Gentile would follow the guidelines as set out by James, if for no other reason than that they adhere to the teachings of Jesus.
Actaully youre right on target in part..........my mission here is to show that you take what you want and reject that which you dont..........surely thats been obvious from the start...
I guess, i could actually break out my bible here and make a list of things that apply and see If you fail in any of these areas while youre telling folks here that the unforgible sin is remarriage.
I thank God that these women here are not accountable to you but to Him alone.
Tell me this if you will..........and please......no beating around the bush or longwinded dodges please.
Is a woman who divorced over abuse and remarried guilty of an eternal sin?
Is it unforgivable by our Lord.
No scripture please......youre words alone..........
Upvote
0