VirOptimus
A nihilist who cares.
Maybe you should learn what the Theory of Evolution contains instead of your strawman version of it before trying to comment.
Optimistic, I know.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Maybe you should learn what the Theory of Evolution contains instead of your strawman version of it before trying to comment.Perhaps "no guesses" in the individual research examples that you offer -- perhaps (?). But putting all these things in a mix to create life is a joke. Science can't create life -- they don't have a working formula.
The well known creation story in Genesis (Holy Bible) is not a research project. It is an eyewitness account.
And if you want to refer to something like the changes of bird beaks over time as microevolution you will get no quarrel from me. But things like the changing a whale into a cow over a period of billions of years of time is a fantasy. Evolution of this sort is patent nonsense.
Maybe you should learn what the Theory of Evolution contains instead of your strawman version of it before trying to comment on it.
Optimistic, I know.
It's called learning. It's a good thing.High School and College biology textbooks have been revised many many times in the last 70 years. No responsible educator today would teach the properties of the human cell with a textbook written in the 1950s and not since revised.
t's called learning. It's a good thing.
Science refines its theories. It's not as if today they like chocolate and tomorrow they like vanilla.And there is nothing wrong with learning. But science is largely a consensus and it is ever-changing, but;
"Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever. Do not be led away by diverse and strange teachings ..." - Hebrews 13.
Science refines its theories. It's not as if today they like chocolate and tomorrow they like vanilla.
Yes, I dont need to disprove any god(s). Thats impossible to do.Nothing wrong with being optimistic. But I've spent too many years in debate with so-called Atheists who claim they have no faith beliefs and so they don't have to offer proofs for the non-existence of a creator.
Im certainly not your ”friend”.That says it all, my friend -- that says it all.
Well, duh. Otherwise it wouldn't be called learning.But most of the science of the past is deficient in part or the whole and the farther back in time you go the more wrong it becomes.
Totally YES!!What if a person thinks the earth is much older, but has only been around for 6000 years?
Do they get the LUDICROUS AWARD as well?
We learn new things, which we can then use to have a better understanding of reality.High School and College biology textbooks have been revised many many times in the last 70 years. No responsible educator today would teach the properties of the human cell with a textbook written in the 1950s and not since revised.
And there is nothing wrong with learning. But science is largely a consensus and it is ever-changing, but;
"Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever. Do not be led away by diverse and strange teachings ..." - Hebrews 13.
With science, we learn new things, and correct old errors.There's nothing at all wrong with either chocolate or vanilla. But most of the science of the past is deficient in part or the whole and the farther back in time you go the more wrong it becomes. Consider the spontaneous generation nonsense that was thought to be truth by many scientists a mere 300 years ago.
We learn new things, which we can then use to have a better understanding of reality.
How is this a problem?
We learn new things, which we can then use to have a better understanding of reality.
How is this a problem?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?