Okay, fatboys, I think we have progressed in our discussion to the following ponts of agreement:
1. There was procreation in the Garden of Eden as evidenced by the plants bearing fruit.
2. Adam and Eve were eating in the Garden of Eden.
3. There is no record that they killed animals for food, nor that they did not.
That leads to the following observatoins on my part.
1. Because there was procreation on the part of plants at least the Garden was being replenished as the seed of the plants took root and sprouted into new plants.
2. It is not at all unreasonable to think that not only the flora were procreating, but also the fauna were, as well as the Garden would have been quickly overgrown with plants if there was an insufficient supply of animals both to pollinate and to consume the fruits and nuts. For example, at the extreme end of the faunal spectrum we have bacteria. If God created only one of each type of bacteria and prevented them from procreating, the Garden would have a severe problem with decay of the fruit. A plant cannot sustain its fruit forever and naturally sheds it in one form or another, thus renewing the cycle of life for the plant.
3. If other fauna were procreating and Adam and Eve were forbidden to have any clue about the process, then they must have been dumb as rocks.
Obviously, we are remain in disagreement on the last three points, but please provide your response to at least the first three points.
Thanks.