• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Instigating Headship/Submission?

Svt4Him

Legend
Site Supporter
Oct 23, 2003
16,711
1,132
54
Visit site
✟98,618.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Anecdotal evidence never is higher than the word of God. I have seen people lie, cheat and steal and prosper, that doesn't make it right.

Oh, I can't read. I thought the thread was investigating submission, not instigating it. Sorry for the rabbit trails.
 
Upvote 0

LiberatedChick

Contributor
Jun 28, 2004
5,057
189
UK
✟28,789.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I don't see submission as an unequal marriage. So the husband is the head and leader...doesn't mean he's anything special...doesn't mean he actually deserves it in any way. He's only in that position because God put him there. He also can't steam ahead not discussing anything with his wife or making decisions without asking for information and opinions she has first....such a relationship would not work because a husband and wife are one. They're joined together as one and are meant to work together as one...else they may run the risk of drifting off in completely different directions. My opinion on submission is a very positive one...I've seen relationships without it and they're far from equal. It's also something that has caused me to evaluate myself and my reactions and improve upon myself. In order to kick start submission in my relationship with my non-Christian husband I've had to take a good look at myself. Our relationship has been much improved since, I still do slip up and not submit on occasions for whatever reason...and then further on down the line realised that I submitting would have been the best thing to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mamaneenie
Upvote 0

Flipper

Flippant Dolphin
Feb 19, 2003
4,259
202
53
✟27,928.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
I tell my husband that I have to submit to him as the spiritual head of the household and he just laughs at me. :D

Sascha, what we do is bring our strengths to the table and delegate the authority thusly. We are humble enough to admit our strengths and weaknesses. For example, here's how we handle money. He's much better with day to day finances, so he keeps up the monthly bills. If he decides to put more money or less money on a bill, he'll discuss it with me, listen to my concerns, but I have no problem with him making the final decision. I'm better at long term investing, finding tax deductions, more of a bigger picture thing with money, so I'll even tell him how to handle his 401K. He doesn't have a problem with that.

We would be mega mutants if we didn't have disagreements that go further than just leaving it to the other to make the decision. We have - but not many (maybe 1 or 2 in the 5 1/2 years we've been married), and none that I can think of right now. If it happens, after discussing it ad infinitum and we still don't have an agreement, I'll leave the final answer to him, but usually if it's something in my area, he'll go with what I want to do, and if it's something in his area, he'll go with what he wants to do.

A lot of women take the submission thing as an insult to their intelligence. As women, we have to work harder than men to be respected outside of the home, and it's easy to feel like we need to do that at home as well. A huge criteria in finding a good mate is to find one who respects and maybe even admires your mind. It sounds like it should go without saying, but when you think about it, submission would be much easier to do when you have a disagreement, when he knows that your opinion on the situation comes from intelligent thinking. He might not take your suggestion, but it will be given serious thought, and if his decision is wrong, he's smart enough to maybe think to listen to you the next time. If he's right, he won't hold it against you because he respects you. While it is our wanting to control that can break up Biblical submission, Biblical submission also breaks down just as much when the husband does not respect the wife's intelligence. It breaks down further when the wife acts out on the anger that the disrespect rightfully causes.

In a good corporation, the corporate president values the insight of the vice president and makes the final decision, but it's the vice president that really keeps things running, and a good president will do everything to allow that to continue. You have two presidents, and nothing will get done. A good small corporation could be a model for a good marriage.
 
Upvote 0

shania

Active Member
Oct 18, 2003
260
2
51
✟410.00
Faith
Protestant
"But I want you to know that the head of every man is Christ, the head of woman is man, and the head of Christ is God" (Scripture reference)

I still have yet to learn to copy and paste a direct quote, so I'll tell you this is in response the scripture mentionned on page 4.

This couldn't be more true. We just have to look in society today to see how men are the head of women. Look at all of the CEO men, as opposed to women, managers, bosses, presidents, lots of men in power and few women.

Women are the ones who are victimized by men instead of vice versa (well very rarely vice versa) in abusive relationships, etc....battered wives...etc. Who would logically stay with an abusive man, but statistically so many women do it.

This is because men are the head of women in so many cases. A women does not have the intention of getting herself into a bad situation but it happens many times in our society. His idea of how the relationship should be is often how the relationship will be.

But what if a man believes the decision-making should be mutually shared?

Some men believe this but are pressured into WEARING THE PANTS all of the time by other traditional thinking men, when in reality they don't feel comfortable with this because Jesus never did that himself. They are told they aren't real men if they don't make all the decisions for the family.

In my opinion, no one should wear the pants all of the time or make all of the final decisions. The only man I would want to be with is one who would SHARE the pants with me. they are not mine or his, but ours. We decide mutually how to make decisions.

I believe this because I have yet to see examples when Jesus advised others how many goats and cattle they should own, what trade their child should be trained in, where they should live, when they should vacation and where, etc...

Personally speaking, I know that I would feel degraded and disrespected if I got married and my husband went and did things without consulting with me first, and I would never dream of doing the same to him.

On the other hand, some women love it when men do that - and so be it. If it works for them, great.
 
Upvote 0

hazeleyes80

Contributor
Aug 19, 2004
5,545
400
45
South Carolina
✟30,051.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
shania said:
"But I want you to know that the head of every man is Christ, the head of woman is man, and the head of Christ is God" (Scripture reference)

I still have yet to learn to copy and paste a direct quote, so I'll tell you this is in response the scripture mentionned on page 4.

This couldn't be more true. We just have to look in society today to see how men are the head of women. Look at all of the CEO men, as opposed to women, managers, bosses, presidents, lots of men in power and few women.

Women are the ones who are victimized by men instead of vice versa (well very rarely vice versa) in abusive relationships, etc....battered wives...etc. Who would logically stay with an abusive man, but statistically so many women do it.

This is because men are the head of women in so many cases. A women does not have the intention of getting herself into a bad situation but it happens many times in our society. His idea of how the relationship should be is often how the relationship will be.

But what if a man believes the decision-making should be mutually shared?

Some men believe this but are pressured into WEARING THE PANTS all of the time by other traditional thinking men, when in reality they don't feel comfortable with this because Jesus never did that himself. They are told they aren't real men if they don't make all the decisions for the family.

In my opinion, no one should wear the pants all of the time or make all of the final decisions. The only man I would want to be with is one who would SHARE the pants with me. they are not mine or his, but ours. We decide mutually how to make decisions.

I believe this because I have yet to see examples when Jesus advised others how many goats and cattle they should own, what trade their child should be trained in, where they should live, when they should vacation and where, etc...

Personally speaking, I know that I would feel degraded and disrespected if I got married and my husband went and did things without consulting with me first, and I would never dream of doing the same to him.

On the other hand, some women love it when men do that - and so be it. If it works for them, great.
I couldn't agree more. When people talk about Jesus "leading" his followers, they are correct. However, He didn't lead them in which house to buy, what kind of car to buy, where to live, etc. He led His followers in faith. Quite frankly, given the fact that I haven't been a true Christian very long, it would be nice if I could marry someone who has been a true Christian for much longer than me so that I could learn more about the Christian faith from him. (Just to clarify, I was raised in a Christian denomination. Up until about a year ago however, I went through a period of being agnostic and borderline atheistic, but still went to church "just in case" to get my "stay-out-of-hell points.") However, saying that a man should have the final decision in everything just because he's a man can be downright dangerous. If he's a spendthrift and his wife is an expert accountant, who should really decide on the family budget? The husband (purely because he's a man and despite the fact that his idea of a budget will put the family in financial ruin), or the wife who will make sure they have the amount of money they need for the necessities with some left over? If there is a disagreement on a different issue (what color car to buy for example), rather than the husband making the decision to get the color he really wants (leaving his wife feeling stepped-on and insignificant), why not compromise and get a color that they can both live with? If the whole idea of "the woman has to go along with what the man wants at all times" is truly the way a Christian marriage works, then I am NEVER getting married. I don't need a second childhood. I'm truly sorry if my statements offend anyone, but this is honestly how I feel. If you're a woman who is into the "wifely submission only" thing, then go for it.
 
Upvote 0

Sascha Fitzpatrick

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2004
6,534
470
✟9,123.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hmm,

See, when I look at my Bible, I don't see that whole 'man does what he wants, wife fades in distance' thing that a lot of you are talking about when you're saying the negative parts of submission. I look at Ephesians, and I look at Proverbs 31, and other verses where women WERE able to make decisions, and were married, and I don't see what you see.

Where I do see it is in a lot of marriages - and I see a lot of marriages fail because of it, or if not fail, people who stick because they 'have to', and don't think it's possible to change behaviour.

Most of what you are talking about, particularly Shania, we do anyway. The key thing is we TALK, we VOICE our opinions, and more often than not our decision is mutually based. Just cos I choose to submit, doesn't mean B walks all over me, and ignores what I may have to say, and forgets I'm part of the relationship - if he did, he'd be forgetting his command to LOVE me.

I think, when you are voicing the negatives of submission, I'm seeing a lot of reasons that came as a part of people not reading their bibles, and instigating a very dangerous form of submission. The submission and headship mentioned in the Bible promotes strength in both partners, love in both partners and respecting of both partners.

I never feel undermined when it comes to a place where I leave the final decision up to Brad. He loves me, and shows me that by listening to my opinion, seeing my side of things, and either a) agreeing b) compromising or c) disagreeing with me, but still respecting my opinion. More often than not (b) is instigated if there is a disagreement.

Anyway, yeah, enjoying this discussion immensely, but I think a lot of times when people are 'bagging' submission, they are actually being negative to what they see PEOPLE do in regards to submission, rather than what the Bible says!

I think that as long as I keep reading my Bible, investigating what it says about relationships and life, I'm going to be okay with this whole submission/headship thing. I think you'll find that most of the women in here who agree with the submission/headship thing are very strong and wise women in their own right, and are still able to use their knowledge in their marriages for decision making, even when their husbands are the 'heads of the household'.

:)

Sasch
 
Upvote 0

gsammo79

Member
Oct 18, 2004
16
1
✟142.00
Faith
Baptist
Wives are respected and really to be seen as gifts from God, (Proverbs). Denying your wife her identity and dehumanizing her isn't love, it's abuse. It's a mutual, give and take, but men shouldn't hang their authority (household/marriage) over their wife's head like a tyrant..... (i've been watching Oprah lately)
 
Upvote 0

hazeleyes80

Contributor
Aug 19, 2004
5,545
400
45
South Carolina
✟30,051.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
gsammo79 said:
male dominance in a relationship shouldn't be understood in the 'whip cracking' context that its being implied as. If 'submit under your husbands' isn't as black and white as 'husbands should love their wives as Christ loves the church' then you've got a problem.
I also see a passage that says "submit to each other under fear of God" and another 1Cor.13:5 that says that love is not supposed to "seek itself" (i.e. that neither person should be forcing their will on the other). To me that smacks of mutual submission/compromise. I've seen several people on this forum site say in posts that "2 people can't drive a car" (they can if they're driving in the same direction or if they take turns depending on area of expertise/knowledge of the area) and that "a husband and wife cannot submit to each other...that's impossible," (no it's not...just compromise and nobody feels stepped on) but yet the Bible states that it is possible and that husbands and wives should do it. In direct answer to your comment, I do see that the Bible says that wives should submit to their husbands and husbands should love their wives as Christ loves the church, but those aren't the only 2 passages I'm looking at. But like I stated in my previous post on this topic, people getting up in arms about my view don't need to. I'm not one of those "I'll never be complete without a man in my life!" women, so there's a good chance that trying to convince me to look only at the "wifely submission" passage will not even be necessary.
 
Upvote 0

Jenna

Senior Veteran
Jun 13, 2002
3,089
192
Michigan
Visit site
✟4,598.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I don't think that anyone is saying that men don't equally submit to their wives. I think that we are just called to different types of submission. There are many things that a man does out of love for his wife that he wouldn't normally do otherwise. His love motivates him to take her opinion into consideration, to value her contributions to the relationships and family, etc. I don't believe that anyone is saying that treating each other well is only a one-way street, where the wife has to constantly be giving up her wants and desires for her husband. I will say though that when she makes a point to stop fighting him for everything that she wants, she opens up the option of him being able to freely give to her of his own love and free will. :)
 
Upvote 0

Cordy

“In case I don't see ya…”
Feb 8, 2004
5,300
888
✟31,997.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
ChristianGradStudent said:
I also see a passage that says "submit to each other under fear of God" and another 1Cor.13:5 that says that love is not supposed to "seek itself" (i.e. that neither person should be forcing their will on the other). To me that smacks of mutual submission/compromise. I've seen several people on this forum site say in posts that "2 people can't drive a car" (they can if they're driving in the same direction or if they take turns depending on area of expertise/knowledge of the area) and that "a husband and wife cannot submit to each other...that's impossible," (no it's not...just compromise and nobody feels stepped on) but yet the Bible states that it is possible and that husbands and wives should do it. In direct answer to your comment, I do see that the Bible says that wives should submit to their husbands and husbands should love their wives as Christ loves the church, but those aren't the only 2 passages I'm looking at. But like I stated in my previous post on this topic, people getting up in arms about my view don't need to. I'm not one of those "I'll never be complete without a man in my life!" women, so there's a good chance that trying to convince me to look only at the "wifely submission" passage will not even be necessary.


ChristianGradStudent,
Your post really points out how the church has separated “mutual submission” from “wifely submission”. People separate these doctrines, or sometimes deny the one they don’t like, but the sad thing is that these two concepts are NOT separate ideas or passages. Mutual submitting and “wifely” submission are actually the same passage – the same sentence to be exact. When one realizes that they are not separate isolated concepts as we have been sometimes taught, one can understand that the wifely submission is done in the context of mutual submission, not the divided submissive wife vs. leading husband context the church culture sometimes adheres to.
 
Upvote 0

Svt4Him

Legend
Site Supporter
Oct 23, 2003
16,711
1,132
54
Visit site
✟98,618.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
ChristianGradStudent said:
I also see a passage that says "submit to each other under fear of God" and another 1Cor.13:5 that says that love is not supposed to "seek itself" (i.e. that neither person should be forcing their will on the other). To me that smacks of mutual submission/compromise. I've seen several people on this forum site say in posts that "2 people can't drive a car" (they can if they're driving in the same direction or if they take turns depending on area of expertise/knowledge of the area) and that "a husband and wife cannot submit to each other...that's impossible," (no it's not...just compromise and nobody feels stepped on) but yet the Bible states that it is possible and that husbands and wives should do it. In direct answer to your comment, I do see that the Bible says that wives should submit to their husbands and husbands should love their wives as Christ loves the church, but those aren't the only 2 passages I'm looking at. But like I stated in my previous post on this topic, people getting up in arms about my view don't need to. I'm not one of those "I'll never be complete without a man in my life!" women, so there's a good chance that trying to convince me to look only at the "wifely submission" passage will not even be necessary.
I also see a passage that says "submit to each other under fear of God" and another 1Cor.13:5 that says that love is not supposed to "seek itself"

The next time you are in church, try telling your pastor you will be preaching, just to see how he submits. Granted this is a hypothetical situation, one would never dream of doing this, as it is out of order. So mutual submission is still done in order, and there is still lines of authority. If a Christian cop pulls me over for speeding, I can't tell him to submit to me and not write me a ticket, and no one would dare say I could. Therefore there is more to mutual submission than husband and wife being equal positionally, and there are more than enough verses to support the husband as having delegated authority from God in a household.
 
Upvote 0

mamaneenie

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2003
3,225
52
49
Australia
✟26,146.00
Faith
Christian
I see submitting to my husband as something that hasn't come easily, but over time, I have found that if my husband loves me and respects me, it is a pleasure to let him be the spiritual leader in this family. I find that by praying for him I tend to have influence in the direction this family takes. There are very few times we disagree over an issue of great importance because we pray together about it and always try to get God's perspective on what is happening. I find that when I am respecting my husband he respects me, and listens to my ideas and suggestions.
 
Upvote 0

Cordy

“In case I don't see ya…”
Feb 8, 2004
5,300
888
✟31,997.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Svt4Him said:
The next time you are in church, try telling your pastor you will be preaching, just to see how he submits. Granted this is a hypothetical situation, one would never dream of doing this, as it is out of order. So mutual submission is still done in order, and there is still lines of authority. If a Christian cop pulls me over for speeding, I can't tell him to submit to me and not write me a ticket, and no one would dare say I could.


Those examples have nothing to do with submission. Submission is instigated by the person submitting, not commanded by the person being submitted to. By commanding, a person is asserting authority over another, which is a totally different issue (and a scary one at that).

A husband cannot command his wife to submit, nor can a wife do the same to her husband. Submitting to one other is done when we put others above ourselves – when a husband puts his wife and her desires and well being over his own, and visa versa. It has nothing to do with asserting control over others.
 
Upvote 0

whatseekye

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2004
819
69
55
Los Angeles
✟1,283.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Johnnz said:
Sascha,

I have been a major contributor in diverting the thrust of yor thread. I feel so deeply about this submission thing because my wife and I have spent over three decades of seeing the devastation it causes in families - destroyed wives and children - and in the church - pastorial control, manipulation, hurt people and the destruction of active christian comittment. So back to your original post.

As a husband I endeavour to have a relationship with my wife that respects her views, readily accept areas where she is far better/more gifted/more knowledgeable than I am, am prepared to share responsibilities with her with family care, household duties and other mutual activities.

I have learned that, when we differ, she is often proved right by subsequent events, so I must always attempt to listen to and properly evaluate her counsel and advice.

She need her own space, time and interests. She cannot be expected to always agree with me, to follow all that I do or become involved in. She needs friends and relationships outside of me.

I recognise that when God created a woman as his helper it was for them to learn to share all of life with each other, as equal beings crafted in the Divine image.

John
NZ
You truly are a good man and a wonderful disciple of Christ. Your wife is truly a lucky woman. May you and all your family be blessed.
 
Upvote 0

alaskamolly

Queen of the Tundra
Jul 17, 2004
611
80
50
The Great North
Visit site
✟1,147.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
As a husband I endeavour to have a relationship with my wife that respects her views, readily accept areas where she is far better/more gifted/more knowledgeable than I am, am prepared to share responsibilities with her with family care, household duties and other mutual activities.

I have learned that, when we differ, she is often proved right by subsequent events, so I must always attempt to listen to and properly evaluate her counsel and advice.

She need her own space, time and interests. She cannot be expected to always agree with me, to follow all that I do or become involved in. She needs friends and relationships outside of me.

I recognise that when God created a woman as his helper it was for them to learn to share all of life with each other, as equal beings crafted in the Divine image.--John

John,

My husband and I believe that the Bible speaks of both mutual submission (of believer to believer) and Biblical headship (husband leading his family).

Christianity is rightly symbolized with a cross--the ultimate paradox (both wholly merciful and wholly exacting, the only place where both peace and righteousness can kiss). I think the marraige relationship is much the same--both wholly submitted one to another, and yet wholly given to a husband leading and a wife submitting. And I think Scripture supports both.


Anyways, all that to say that you gave a description as to how you see and treat your wife. My husband views himself as the leader of his home, and the way he treats me is almost exactly has you have described above, if not better (heehee).

I am very much his helpmate, and yet because of his godly leadership (ie., leadership, GOD'S way, not Wall Street's way!), I am valued, honored, treasured, and respected. My opinions are requested and appreciated--my thoughts are valued, my insights respected, my giftings honored, and my totally-opposite-from-his personality is allowed to thrive. :)

Not saying we are the perfect couple or that God has nothing left to do, or saying that we were like this the day we were married--far from that*grin*-- but just saying that a husband leading and a wife following does in no way mean that she is not valued, or that she is required to drop her own personality and try to morph into his... Those ideas come from our own false concepts of authority and submission.

In our opinion, a true godly leader will have a flourishing wife. It is much like a gardener who tends a garden--you can tell how 'good' he is by how his garden grows! In Psalm 128 God says that the righteous man will have a 'flourishing' wife, her vines extending past her home, her fruitfulness obvious to all. This man in Psalm 128 leads his home, but because of his GODLY leadership, his wife is not only blessed by it, she's overflowing!


Warm Regards,
Molly
 
Upvote 0

Svt4Him

Legend
Site Supporter
Oct 23, 2003
16,711
1,132
54
Visit site
✟98,618.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
mbams said:
Those examples have nothing to do with submission. Submission is instigated by the person submitting, not commanded by the person being submitted to. By commanding, a person is asserting authority over another, which is a totally different issue (and a scary one at that).

A husband cannot command his wife to submit, nor can a wife do the same to her husband. Submitting to one other is done when we put others above ourselves – when a husband puts his wife and her desires and well being over his own, and visa versa. It has nothing to do with asserting control over others.
So then mutual submission means nothing gets done? As far as my hypothetical situations, they are examples of submission, as submission only happens when there's disagreement. I disagree with the cop, so does he mutually submit to me? If everyone is running around mutually submitting to one another, I shouldn't have to command the cop, nor should I command my pastor not to preach, I should just ask nice. And a husband shouldn't have to command his wife to submit, God has. In the same way a wife cannot command a man to love her, but God does. We are commanded to mutually submit, but we're also commanded to submit to:

We are called to submit to:
  • God

    Submit therefore to God. Jas. 4:7
  • Believers

    ... and be subject to one another in the fear of Christ. Eph. 5:21
    clothe yourself with humility toward one another 1 Pet. 5:5
    be devoted to one another in brotherly love; give preference to one another in honor; Rom. 12:10
  • Ministers and Spiritual Leaders (elders, group leaders, teachers, ...)

    Obey your leaders, and submit to them; for they keep watch over your souls, as those who will give an account. Heb. 13:17
  • Governing Authorities / Human Institutions (government, law enforcement, bosses ...)

    Let every person be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. ... Wherefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also for conscience' sake. Rom. 13:1,5

    Submit yourselves for the Lord's sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority, or to governors as sent by him for the punishment of evildoers and the praise of those who do right. For such is the will of God ... 1 Pet. 2:13-15
And let me further quote:

Wives, be subject to your husbands, as it fitting in the Lord.
Col. 3:18

Wives, be subject to your own husbands, as to the Lord. Eph. 5:22

Therefore, just as the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives
be to their own husbands in everything. In the same way, you wives,
be submissive to your own husbands so that even if any of them are
disobedient to the word, they may be won without a word by the
behavior of their wives, as they observe your chaste and respectful
behavior ... [adorn yourselves] with the imperishable quality of a
gentle and quiet spirit, which is precious in the sight of God. For in
this way in former times the holy women also, who hope in God,
used to adorn themselves, being submissive to their own husbands.
1Pet. 3:1-5

... be sensible, pure, workers at home, kind, being subject to their
own husbands, that the word of God may not be dishonored.
***. 2:5

In looking at submission and marriage, it seems clear to me that scripturally women are called to submit to the leadership and direction of their husbands. Given the number of scriptures that spell this out so simply in black and white, I find it difficult to see that the scriptures could mean anything other that what they actually say. Although this area of submission can affect more personal issues (and, yes, be a bit scary), I see submitting to a husband as similar to submitting to any other authority. Trusting that a husband is called and anointed to direct the home is no different than trusting that a pastor or elder is called and anointed to direct a church (or a scout master to direct a troop, or a teacher to direct the Bible study etc.). None will be perfect, but each person is called to do a particular job and will be enabled by God to do so.

www.themarriagebed.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: alaskamolly
Upvote 0

whatseekye

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2004
819
69
55
Los Angeles
✟1,283.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sascha Fitzpatrick said:
I'm particularly addressing this to younger, newly married women and men here, but I appreciate everyone's input.

How did you instigate the Biblical form of headship and submission in your marriage? How do you view headship and submission?

For you 'more independant' women, particularly those who had a long time of singleness before you wed, how did you go about instigating submission to your husband? How tricky was it? How did your husbands respond to headship?
Hi Sascha,

I wanted to give you a good reply to your original question, rather than just responding to the other posts of people here. I think I know what you are getting at now in this question, after a good night's sleep! Sometimes thing become clearer to me in the morning.

before I get in to my personal story in my marriage, let me tell you something that I realized that I believe is absolutely fundamental to a Christian marriage as described in the Bible. First and foremost, the husband must be submitted to Christ in a personal relationship with him. I truly believe that is necessary for this model of headship. I fully admit that I don't completely understand what headship means, but I do know that if the husband is to love his wife as Christ loves the church, then the husband has to actually know Christ and have his own will submitted to the Will of God. None of us are perfect. In fact, I'm not even talking about our having achieved some kind of perfection before marriage. I'm talking about a position of relationship and a knowing of Christ, and walking with Him as #1 in our life. I just believe that if a man isn't in that kind of submission to Christ, then he can't possibly be the head. For example, if the husband doesn't know Christ and is not seeking to do His will.

Basic discipleship = Mark 8:34 ""If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me." Which means, firstly, self-denial, and secondly, taking up the Cross, that is, doing the Will of God and not your own self-will. Because when Jesus submitted himself to the Cross, he was doing the Will of the Father, and clearly it was not something he personally relished (remember his prayers in the Garden of Gesthemene).

A young woman at my church recently asked me and my husband to counsel her and her boyfriend on the topic of marriage. I was surprised she asked us for a couple of reasons. First of all, my husband and I aren't on the outside the most perfect appearing couple. Also, we are still trying to figure all this out. But my husband and I have realized that our marriage is one of the most perfect areas for the doing of discipleship. There is much temptation to selfishness when selflessness is called on both sides. And also, whenever it's a private place in your life, and only God (and your spouse) truly knows how you are doing, then it's an area for serious discipleship. It's easy to behave when "others" are watching, but how you act when you know God is the only "other" watching. Well...

Anyhow, I wanted to tell you that I realized something that very night after the young woman had asked for the counseling. I asked myself why God would ever require any form of "submission" or following of the husband, and I realized that the wisdom in it is that a woman had better be careful who she marries. If you are going to serve the Lord by serving your husband, it would be so much more easy and beautiful if the man was truly submitted to the Lord.

I don't want to sound sexist, but I believe that it is a real struggle for many men to really get to a place where they are submitted to the Lord. The culture and perhaps even child rearing has really built men up to see themselves as self-directed and independent. It takes real relationship with Jesus and a daily walk to get to a point of wanting to be self-less and yielded to God's Will. I would say that serious discussion as well as earnest prayer is what is needed. It's possible that you may want to encourage your boyfriend to cultivate some friendships with men at church who are serious about their faith.

I almost forgot to tell you about my marriage. My husband and I weren't even Christians before we got married. We lived together for a few months and married in less than a year total of knowing each other. We were really in love. About a year after we got married, I was born again, all of a sudden...without anyone witnessing to me. I was just reading a book at home alone. But that night when my husband came home, and I started raving about Jesus to him, he immediately took an interest and even told me that he'd briefly believed in Jesus when he was in the military, but fell away for a long time afterwards. Anyhow, long story short, we both became completely fascinated and drawn to Jesus, and we committed our lives to Him. We found a church about a year later. We are really serious about our committment to God. I'd say we have walked equally, as spiritual partners through all of this. It's been incredible. There is never a time when we don't want to share something about our faith together. We talk all the time, pray together, and study the bible together. It's been a total of 3 years that we have been following Jesus like this.

But during this time, we have still experienced conflicts in our marriage. It has been very disturbing and worrying. We have prayed a lot about it, and are seeking guidance from God and studying the Word of God. One thing that has helped us 100% is realizing that the wife is to submit to her husband AS TO THE LORD, and the husband is to love his wife AS CHRIST LOVES THE CHURCH. Notice the repetition of the premise of this husband/wife relationship is to truly know Jesus Christ. When we realized that fundamentally we each have to be submitted to Jesus Christ, and that selfishness is never justified in our marriage, it helped us dramatically. Often when we do have a conflict in our marriage, we see clearly that it is selfishness on one or both sides. It's not easy to turn from selfishness but it seems like when you recognize the selfishness and see the situation from God's point of view...it just makes everything clear and visible in the true light of God's way.

But how can you get to that place unless both of you are submitted to Christ and want to serve Him in your marriage?

To emphasize: It's true that both the woman and the man are submitted, not so much just to each other, but both are submitted to Jesus Christ. When you see this, and you see how this true submission to God's Will can be acted out in the marriage, then you see how organic and perfect this plan of God's is for marriage. It should be a natural working out of your discipleship to the Lord in your marrage. As to the Lord. As Christ loves the Church.

Another afterthought: I can see how some people would point out that a man doesn't have to be a believer in Jesus Christ in order to love his wife. I mean, that's obvious. There are so many good husbands who are athiests, agnostics, followers of other religions, etc. So it's self-evident that a nonbeliever can be a good husband. The question is, how is a Christian husband different? What is different about a marriage where both the husband and the wife are disciples of Christ?
 
Upvote 0

LiberatedChick

Contributor
Jun 28, 2004
5,057
189
UK
✟28,789.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
whatseekye said:
before I get in to my personal story in my marriage, let me tell you something that I realized that I believe is absolutely fundamental to a Christian marriage as described in the Bible. First and foremost, the husband must be submitted to Christ in a personal relationship with him. I truly believe that is necessary for this model of headship. I fully admit that I don't completely understand what headship means, but I do know that if the husband is to love his wife as Christ loves the church, then the husband has to actually know Christ and have his own will submitted to the Will of God. None of us are perfect. In fact, I'm not even talking about our having achieved some kind of perfection before marriage. I'm talking about a position of relationship and a knowing of Christ, and walking with Him as #1 in our life. I just believe that if a man isn't in that kind of submission to Christ, then he can't possibly be the head. For example, if the husband doesn't know Christ and is not seeking to do His will.
I disagree. My husband is a non-believer yet he is the head and he loves me as Christ loves the church. He may not know what exactly that means and he may not know Christ but he still does it. And though he does not believe I should still submit.

1 Peter 3:1-2 said:
Wives, in the same way be submissive to your husbands so that, if any of them do not believe the word, they may be won over without words by the behavior of their wives, when they see the purity and reverence of your lives.
 
Upvote 0