• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

sparklecat

Senior Contributor
Nov 29, 2003
8,085
334
40
✟10,001.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Fear said:
I would not condone a sexual relationship unless one of them was sterized, the risk of accidentally having inbread children is too great.
If you had a child who was a dwarf who fell in love with another dwarf, would you also want one of them to be sterilized? IIRC, the death rate for a child of that union is much much higher on average than the chance for an incestuous relationship to result in a genetic problem to a child.
 
Upvote 0

Danhalen

Healing
Feb 13, 2005
8,098
471
51
Ohio
✟33,099.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Marek said:
I'm curious. This is a little of topic but, if we allow gay marriages to be legal, then should we also include the legalization of marriages between brother and sister, mother and son, father and daughter, brother and brother, etc. It seems that we should. If not, what is the difference?
to follow your tangent, which i think is perfectly on topic, i think that there is a difference.

outlaw any incestual relationship that can produce offspring because of the possible transmission of genetic defects. we can not punish a child with genetic defects if we can take steps to prevent them. if the couple agrees to sterilization, then we can allow the marriage.
 
Upvote 0

Marek

Senior Member
Dec 5, 2003
1,670
60
Visit site
✟2,139.00
Faith
Catholic
sparklecat said:
Do you know on what grounds incestuous marriages are illegal? If it's for moral reasons, I'd have no problem with legalizing this. If it's for reasons that the government actually has a right to make laws based upon, that might be different.
I guess they are illegal for the same reasons that gay marriages are illegal. I guess you could consider those moral reasons?
 
Upvote 0

Danhalen

Healing
Feb 13, 2005
8,098
471
51
Ohio
✟33,099.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
sparklecat said:
If you had a child who was a dwarf who fell in love with another dwarf, would you also want one of them to be sterilized? IIRC, the death rate for a child of that union is much much higher on average than the chance for an incestuous relationship to result in a genetic problem to a child.
there is greater genetic variation between two dwarves than there is between siblings. it is an apple/oranges argument.
 
Upvote 0

Thirst_For_Knowledge

I Am A New Title
Jan 20, 2005
6,610
340
43
Michigan
Visit site
✟8,524.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
sparklecat said:
If you had a child who was a dwarf who fell in love with another dwarf, would you also want one of them to be sterilized? IIRC, the death rate for a child of that union is much much higher on average than the chance for an incestuous relationship to result in a genetic problem to a child.

Another good point.
 
Upvote 0

sparklecat

Senior Contributor
Nov 29, 2003
8,085
334
40
✟10,001.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Marek said:
I guess they are illegal for the same reasons that gay marriages are illegal. I guess you could consider those moral reasons?

Yes. But incestuous marriages may be outlawed because of the chance of a deformed child, I don't know.
 
Upvote 0

Marek

Senior Member
Dec 5, 2003
1,670
60
Visit site
✟2,139.00
Faith
Catholic
Danhalen said:
to follow your tangent, which i think is perfectly on topic, i think that there is a difference.

outlaw any incestual relationship that can produce offspring because of the possible transmission of genetic defects. we can not punish a child with genetic defects if we can take steps to prevent them. if the couple agrees to sterilization, then we can allow the marriage.
I agree with you, except I don't think that sterilization should be required. I think marriage and sex should be two separate issues. Although it should be illegal for anyone to engage in an 'incestual relationship that can produce offspring'.
 
Upvote 0
sparklecat said:
If you had a child who was a dwarf who fell in love with another dwarf, would you also want one of them to be sterilized? IIRC, the death rate for a child of that union is much much higher on average than the chance for an incestuous relationship to result in a genetic problem to a child.

I think that would be a completely different situation, but it is a tough question. I would never make a decision for them. I think that if two drarfs understand the risk of having child with a genetic disease and understand the risks of having sex they should take necessary precautions, that's all. Same goes for sibblings.
 
Upvote 0

wowbagger

The Infinitely Prolonged
Nov 3, 2003
576
48
✟974.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
thirstforknowledge said:
I think it is what Danhalen said. Social programming. Most people think homosexuality is wrong from a religious standpoint, which I guess could be considered a forum of social programming.

I think I'll have to give this some more thought.

Actually, I think incest is different than homosexuality for the basic fact that it is shown to be avoided in other primates. It seems evolution figured out that a male chimp needs to leave at maturity and join another group to mate with females not in his family. In bonobos the females leave to join other groups to avoid getting raped by their fathers (who, just like humans, sometimes cross the line). There is also a type of pigeon that even when you raise them apart, will still recognize the other as a sibling and will not mate.

So it would seems that the prevalence of "incest avoidance" in nature shows that it has a biological factor, just as homosexualtiy does. For humans we do this by growing up with our siblings, then our minds are programmed not to have sex with those people.

Someone who wants to have sex with a sibling they grew up with is odd because it really goes against normal human nature, whereas homosexuality, while not the norm, does not.

google "incest avoidance" and you should find some things.


In the end though, let them if they want to and hope it's just a phase.
 
Upvote 0

levi501

Senior Veteran
Apr 19, 2004
3,286
226
✟34,690.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Marek said:
I agree with you, except I don't think that sterilization should be required. I think marriage and sex should be two separate issues. Although it should be illegal for anyone to engage in an 'incestual relationship that can produce offspring'.
So are we going to ask them nicely to not have kids?
Pretty please don't have unsafe sex!
What the condom broke??!
 
Upvote 0

sparklecat

Senior Contributor
Nov 29, 2003
8,085
334
40
✟10,001.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Danhalen said:
there is greater genetic variation between two dwarves than there is between siblings. it is an apple/oranges argument.

This site deals with the chances for certain types of dwarfism to be passed on, and how they increase when both parents are dwarfs.

This site does the same (scroll down), though it also points out that it depends upon the reason those concerned are dwarfs.


This is all I've really found about the incest/genetics argument thus far; couldn't find a copy online of the article they talked about in it, but I'll keep looking.
 
Upvote 0

Marek

Senior Member
Dec 5, 2003
1,670
60
Visit site
✟2,139.00
Faith
Catholic
levi501 said:
So are we going to ask them nicely to not have kids?
Pretty please don't have unsafe sex!
What the condom broke??!
Incest is already illegal. We don't ask nicely. If they do have sex, there exists punishments for their actions. Just because they are married, doesn't mean they will have sex when they wouldn't if they weren't married.
 
Upvote 0

ebonicsonly

Well-Known Member
Mar 22, 2005
446
20
42
✟685.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Marek said:
Incest is already illegal. We don't ask nicely. If they do have sex, there exists punishments for their actions. Just because they are married, doesn't mean they will have sex when they wouldn't if they weren't married.
Illegal and legal don't determine right and wrong-correct?:yawn:
 
Upvote 0