In what states will recounts be requested?

[LostMarbels]

USPS employee recants his allegations.

USPS employee who claimed mail-in ballot tampering in PA recants allegations | WBTW

Yeah, there is a lot of lies going on. People ignorant of topics or that fail to even attempt to research, tend to fall for stuff like that.

 

[LostMarbels]

Liars, lie... that is what they do. They suppress information and make up stories. Quit falling for it. You're going to embarrass yourself once the truth comes out....

 

[SimplyMe]

Yes, liars lie. Who can say for sure (at least here on Earth), it may be you that is surprised when the truth comes out.

 

[LostMarbels]

Yes, liars lie. Who can say for sure (at least here on Earth), it may be you that is surprised when the truth comes out.

Maybe some day you will actually respect that I tried to warn you. Maybe not.

 

[LostMarbels]

Here is an article from a local news paper about that lawsuit. Looks similar to previous lawsuits that have been dismissed for lack of evidence. I have not found it on the court's website yet. The article does note that outside of the affidavits, no evidence of the allegations were presented. I read the complaint and some important things like the name of the supervisor was not included.

Yeah... just like people are recanting. Someone wants to put a lid on things and cast aspersions.

 

[7thKeeper]

No kidding... I never heard that before...

How many times are you going to bang your head against that wall and think calling me names will sway me?

Wait... He asked you to show evidence of fraud. Where exactly is the name calling?

 

[LostMarbels]

Federal agents “coerce” USPS whistleblower Hopkins to water down story

 

[7thKeeper]

Federal agents “coerce” USPS whistleblower Hopkins to water down story

Uh huh. Or did this "coercion" involve them asking things to confirm them and suddenly the person couldn't do it and had to retract what he claimed? And I do find that they had to use quotation marks for coercion amusing.

 

[LostMarbels]

Here are 2 screenshots I thought were cool. Left is first or previously in the time line of the video clip as it plays.

Trump has 1,690,589 votes.... on the right Trump has 1,670,631.

So... 1,690,589 - 1,670,631 = 19,958 votes lost

Joe Biden on the left has 1,252,537 votes. Add 19,958... you get 1,272,495... his total on the right.

You can also notice the percentages switch by .6%

 

[LostMarbels]

And I do find that they had to use quotation marks for coercion amusing.

Direct quote: " "

Scare quote: ' '

 

[LostMarbels]

Video in link below picture.

@SeanHannity - SeanHannity - @KayleighMcEnany - "I Have 234 Pages of Sworn...

 

[lasthero]

View attachment 288545

Here are 2 screenshots I thought were cool. Left is first or previously in the time line of the video clip as it plays.

Trump has 1,690,589 votes.... on the right Trump has 1,670,631.

So... 1,690,589 - 1,670,631 = 19,958 votes lost

Joe Biden on the left has 1,252,537 votes. Add 19,958... you get 1,272,495... his total on the right.

You can also notice the percentages switch by .6%

Yes, I've seen it before.

It's not an official count, it was a tabulation on a news station, and so far as I'm aware, it only happened on one of them. What likely happened is someone made a mistake and fixed it. It happens, and it's not like it even gave Biden the lead or anything, so I'm not sure what the big deal is.

 

[LostMarbels]

It's not an official count

But...

What likely happened

Sounds like a 'theory'. What do you base this theory on? The self-fulfilling prophets of the MSM protecting themselves across networks?

 

[lasthero]

Sounds like a 'theory'.

Sure, you can call it that. Did I say anything to pretend otherwise?

What do you base this theory on? The self-fulfilling prophets of the MSM protecting themselves across networks?

A complete lack of anything to suggest anything else.

Again, it wasn't an official count, it happened once, and it seems like it just happened on one news station. And it's not like it gave Biden a lead or anything - Trump was still up at that point. I'm honestly not sure what you're suggesting happened. You haven't even presented your own explanation.

 

[LostMarbels]

Sure, you can call it that. Did I say anything to pretend otherwise?


A complete lack of anything to suggest anything else.

Again, it wasn't an official count, it happened once, and it seems like it just happened on one news station. And it's not like it gave Biden a lead or anything - Trump was still up at that point. I'm honestly not sure what you're suggesting happened. You haven't even presented your own explanation.

Sure... keep pretending nothing is going on.

So how are the affidavits false?

Latter it will be the court ruling… so on to infinity and beyond.

 

[lasthero]

Sure... keep pretending nothing is going on.

Well, enlighten me. What are you suggesting happened? Just pointing at two pictures isn't really doing much.

So how are affidavits false?

Kind of a tangent, there, but okay.

I don't know. That's up to the judges. So far, though, they don't seem to be too swayed by them.

 

[LostMarbels]

Well, enlighten me. What are you suggesting happened? Just pointing at two pictures isn't really doing much.

No, thank you. Not as if this will be a conversation or something.

I don't know. That's up to the judges. So far, though, they don't seem to be too swayed by them.

Ok... well I am off to find more things for people to debunk off the rip, and refute for 'reasons'.

 

[lasthero]

No, thank you. Not as if this will be a conversation or something.

Well, someone's a grumpy Gus.

I think I'm being quite cordial. You're the one being standoffish for some reason.

Ok... well I am off to find more things for people to debunk off the rip, and refute for 'reasons'.

Saying I 'debunked' something would imply that you presented an idea. You didn't. You just posted a couple pictures and offered no explanation or idea to accompany them.

 

[LostMarbels]

Don't worry about it. There is no evidence, because no evidence was presented due to a lack of evidence. We already had the conversation.

Were you aware of this: Senate GOP funds border wall, setting up clash with Democrats ahead of Dec. 11 spending deadline

Seems the GOP and Trump are so awfully concerned, they are going on about their lives. The whole there is no evidence narrative is not working. Matter of fact they are already budgeting the entire second term and are working on structuring the second term's goals.

 

[lasthero]

Don't worry about it. There is no evidence, because no evidence was presented due to a lack of evidence. We already had the conversation.

Did we? I don't recall.

But okay, if you don't want to talk about the pictures you posted, that's fine. Seems strange that you would post pictures then not want to talk about them, but that's your right.

Seems the GOP and Trump are so awfully concerned, they are going on about their lives. The whole there is no evidence narrative is not working. Matter of fact they are already budgeting the entire second term and are working on structuring the second term's goals.

Denial's a sad thing to watch.