In what states will recounts be requested?

[Desk trauma]

Denial's a sad thing to watch.

Stage two, anger, will be even worse.

 

[LostMarbels]

Did we? I don't recall.

All I have to do is watch the news to find out what your opinion is, and what you will parrot. It is so boring.

But okay, if you don't want to talk about the pictures you posted, that's fine. Seems strange that you would post pictures then not want to talk about them, but that's your right.

There is a video in that link you must not have clicked before responding....

Denial's a sad thing to watch.

Yup... already had this conversation.....

 

[lasthero]

All I have to do is watch the news to find out what your opinion is, and what you will parrot. It is so boring.

You're being awfully rude for no reason.

There is a video in that link you must not have clicked before responding....

There is?

You mean this post, right?

View attachment 288545

Here are 2 screenshots I thought were cool. Left is first or previously in the time line of the video clip as it plays.

Trump has 1,690,589 votes.... on the right Trump has 1,670,631.

So... 1,690,589 - 1,670,631 = 19,958 votes lost

Joe Biden on the left has 1,252,537 votes. Add 19,958... you get 1,272,495... his total on the right.

You can also notice the percentages switch by .6%

What video? I just woke up, I'm a little sluggish in the morning, maybe I'm just missing something.

Yup... already had this conversation.....

Okay, then.

 

[LostMarbels]

You're being awfully rude for no reason.

It has been 8 days where no one will say a single thing except for the same 2 talking points: "denial" and "no evidence". It's boring. Im not being rude. I have already heard what you are going to say.

What video? I just woke up, I'm a little sluggish in the morning, maybe I'm just missing something.

In what states will recounts be requested?

 

[lasthero]

It has been 8 days where no one will say a single thing except for the same 2 talking points: "denial" and "no evidence". It's boring. Im not being rude. I have already heard what you are going to say.

Well, if you know what everyone is going to say, why are you even posting here?

In what states will recounts be requested?

That wasn't the post I responded to.

At any rate, I already told you what I thought about the affadavits.

 

[LostMarbels]

Well, if you know what everyone is going to say, why are you even posting here?

People still view the content some times.

At any rate, I already told you what I thought about the affidavits.

Wait... I thought that was just me being rude....

 

[lasthero]

Wait... I thought that was just me being rude....

You are coming off as hostile, yes.

At any rate, in summation.

You posted a picture. I posted what I thought about that picture, and asked you what conclusion you were drawing. You asked me to give the reasoning behind my thoughts, and I did. You neglected to provide your own interpretation, then asked me how the affidavits are fake, even though I don't recall calling them fake in the first place. I said it was a matter for the judges to decide, though I did note that, so far, they don't seem to be making much headway in court.

You then said you were off to find more stuff to debunk, and I noted that I hadn't debunked anything, and indeed, couldn't, because the post I responded to had no actual idea attached to it. You then alluded to some other conversation we had, then asked me if I was aware of what the Senate was doing. I called it denial.

You then, in response to my confusion over not recalling a past conversation we had, said that you just need to watch the news to know what I'll parrot, which I took as a rude comment to make. You also alluded to a video in a post, but it wasn't the one I responded to, which led to confusion, and it was just about the affidavits, which I gave my opinion on earlier.

You then said you've been hearign the same thing about 'no evidence' and 'denial' for eight days straight, even though I haven't said anything about 'no evidence' in this particular conversation and the denial comment was mostly just tongue-in-cheek.

And that brings us to your last post, which I'm honestly not even sure is referring to or is meant to mean.

Just wanted to walk through this, because this has been a short, but odd conversation, and I wanted to make sure I hit all the bases. With that out of the way, do you have anything else to talk about?

 

[LostMarbels]

You are coming off as hostile, yes.

I would guess I am a bit hostel in anticipation. Do you think I expect kindness, and polite conversation discussing topics instead of me personally? The current flavors are there is no evidence, and denial. And pretty much until new opinions have been handed out, that is what I can expect. What ever the flavor of the day so happens to be, it just drones on in every single conversation.

There are people I immediately respond to and got out on a limb to research for. But you get kind of tired being talked through. Not even being addressed. The other person is just locked into a now 8-day-old rant that borders on nagging. They do not even know what your position is. All they know is 'there is no evidence', and 'everyone that doesn't agree with me is in denial'. Not a single individual thought, attempt to discuss or even rational. Just there is no evidence and you are in denial.

You then, in response to my confusion over not recalling a past conversation we had, said that you just need to watch the news to know what I'll parrot, which I took as a rude comment to make.

Why is it rude? Correct me if I am wrong... what do you base your stance on? What is your platform?

 

[LostMarbels]

 

[Paulos23]

Georga has same-day voter registration, so I question what rolls they are looking at. If it is the rolls before the election, then yes it will be higher than that.

The rest of that is paranoia without much evidence. All of Trump's lawsuits have fallen flat, I honestly think they have nothing at this point and are just flailing.

 

[LostMarbels]

THROW ‘EM OUT: PA judge sides with Trump campaign, orders ballots with no proof of ID be discarded | Leo Terrell

https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2020/11/602-MD-2020-Order-Nov.-12.pdf

 

[Paulos23]

View attachment 288674
THROW ‘EM OUT: PA judge sides with Trump campaign, orders ballots with no proof of ID be discarded | Leo Terrell

View attachment 288675

https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2020/11/602-MD-2020-Order-Nov.-12.pdf

OK, still doesn't flip the state to Trump.