Impreccable proof for the Biblical Flood

[Hespera]

I used to think that your number threads were the most pointlessly pathetic thing I'd ever seen on this forum.

Now I disagree -- cheering them on is.

And the sad thing is, you expect us to do likewise.

http://www.staff.uni-marburg.de/~werner/Bilder/sym3x.gif

 

[Split Rock]

That's simple to do.

No other entity had the power to do what God did when it came to the Flood.

God, for instance, is omnipresent; Satan, on the other hand, must walk the earth [to seek whom he may devour].

Then why was God walking around in the Garden of Eden?

Some say this is what Haloween is for; so Satan can have time to rest while his minions take over for awhile.

Some people are real ignorant.

 

[AV1611VET]

And the sad thing is, you expect us to do likewise.

I do?

 

[AV1611VET]

Then why was God walking around in the Garden of Eden?

So Adam and Eve could keep up?

Some people are real ignorant.

Of Halloween? yes, I agree.

 

[Nathan Poe]

I do?

You've tried (and failed) many times to impress newer members by referencing your post count.

A pity it never works where it's quality, not quantity, that matters.

 

[AV1611VET]

You've tried (and failed) many times to impress newer members by referencing your post count.

Impress or correct?

In the future, would you like me to use your post count when a newbie says I've never said [this], or I said [that]?

Please answer this, because that's just what I intend to do -- (only I won't mention your name, I'll just look it up and use the number).

A pity it never works where it's quality, not quantity, that matters.

And I've made it plain that it is not a matter of quality -- haven't I?

 

[Nathan Poe]

Impress or correct?

Impress -- and it fails every time.

In the future, would you like me to use your post count when a newbie says I've never said [this], or I said [that]?

If only you made a point whenever a newbie said that -- but you rarely do.

And I've made it plain that it is not a matter of quality -- haven't I?

Nobody has come to expect quality from you -- least of all yourself, it would seem.

 

[AV1611VET]

If only you made a point whenever a newbie said that -- but you rarely do.

Oh, I think they get it.

After all, you got it when I mentioned your post count, didn't you?

I'll see if I can find the post.

ETA: here we go...

Still need to point to your artificially inflated post count to make yourself feel superior, AV?

It isn't about quality though, is it?

You have over 24,000 posts yourself.

What if someone said you have never claimed to be a professor?

(Try hard to answer this, would you please?)

 

[Delphiki]

Oh, I think they get it.

After all, you got it when I mentioned your post count, didn't you?

I'll see if I can find the post.

ETA: here we go...

It isn't about quality though, is it?

You have over 24,000 posts yourself.

What if someone said you have never claimed to be a professor?

(Try hard to answer this, would you please?)

There's a difference between pointing out ones post count and actually linking to the post containing a relevant post. The fact that someone's post count is in the millions is irrelevant -- especially when most of said posts exist of things like counting from 1 to 1000 a post at a time.

Also, you'd think that as a self-professed Christian, your time would be better spent praying or worshiping than counting posts. That would at least be more relevant to your goals and how Christians are told to go about achieving them.

 

[Hespera]

Talking about it just brings more of them.

 

[AV1611VET]

The fact that someone's post count is in the millions is irrelevant -- especially when most of said posts exist of things like counting from 1 to 1000 a post at a time.

That's exactly correct -- that's why I once said that I would never tell someone who had only 1000 posts that he or she never said [this], or said [that].

Even 100 posts would be rude.

Also, you'd think that as a self-professed Christian, your time would be better spent praying or worshiping than counting posts.

I don't count posts -- I post counts.

 

[chris4243]

You've tried (and failed) many times to impress newer members by referencing your post count.

A pity it never works where it's quality, not quantity, that matters.

It impressed me as a person who is thoughtlessly empty. And ten times more so because he says he didn't use a bot. I'd put him below a spammer on the food chain, because at least spammers get banned and go away.

Wow, are you the original Poe in Poe's Law? It's an honor to meet you.

 

[AV1611VET]

Talking about it just brings more of them.

Yes -- and unfortunately they can't see the irony of what they're doing.

Inflating their own post counts as well.

I love the ones who complain I'm necrobumping a thread -- (as if it's their job to police the Internet) -- by spamming these threads with some kind of tarot card or D&D card, or whatever it is.

I have a feeling they would never report me for it -- as they already know it's not against the rules.

That's why they say something themselves, thinking they're making some kind of point.

One poster (well, two) doesn't even want me to go through the proper channels -- they just want me outright banned; without warnings or infractions.

Go directly to JAIL -- do not pass GO.

 

[CaliforniaSun]

Yes -- and unfortunately they can't see the irony of what they're doing.

Inflating their own post counts as well.

I love the ones who complain I'm necrobumping a thread -- (as if it's their job to police the Internet) -- by spamming these threads with some kind of tarot card or D&D card, or whatever it is.

I have a feeling they would never report me for it -- as they already know it's not against the rules.

That's why they say something themselves, thinking they're making some kind of point.

One poster (well, two) doesn't even want me to go through the proper channels -- they just want me outright banned; without warnings or infractions.

Go directly to JAIL -- do not pass GO.

Just for the sake of argument, if you were to be banned, how would you spend all of your time?

 

[AV1611VET]

Just for the sake of argument, if you were to be banned, how would you spend all of your time?

Banned.

 

[Phred]

Nothing God couldn't handle, folks.

Each creature from krill to whales was provided with a magic bubble.

 

[AV1611VET]

Each creature from krill to whales was provided with a magic bubble.

If God can keep a cruise of oil from running out (1 Kings 17), I'm sure He can do the same with O[sub]2[/sub].

 

[rjc34]

If God can keep a cruise of oil from running out (1 Kings 17), I'm sure He can do the same with O[sub]2[/sub].

How come God didn't just give us refined gasoline in separate compartments? Why bother making us pollute the earth refining it ourselves? Sounds like something only an inefficient or non-omniscient/non-omnipotent creator would do.

 

[AV1611VET]

How come God didn't just give us refined gasoline in separate compartments?

Then the refineries would be out of work and people would be complaining that God keeps us unemployed.

 

[Hespera]

How come God didn't just give us refined gasoline in separate compartments? Why bother making us pollute the earth refining it ourselves? Sounds like something only an inefficient or non-omniscient/non-omnipotent creator would do.

Every day I see these huge long coal-trains going by. Why? Coz the coal was all put in the wrong place, and we have to put it where it belong.