contango
...and you shall live...
- Jul 9, 2010
- 3,853
- 1,324
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
OP, without going over all the names that have been mentioned (partly because I can't be bothered to list them all and partly because I don't want to imply I agree or disagree with any of them in particular), you've no doubt noticed a lot of disagreement in here over who preaches truth and who does not.
Being faced with a list of some people saying Pastor Joe Blow is a great guy who preaches solidly from Scripture, and list of other people saying Pastor Joe Blow preaches some other gospel that is false and providing reasons they think he is a false teacher, it's easy to see why a new Christian like yourself would be confused. After all, Pastor Joe can't be simultaneously speaking truth and falsehood, so who is right?
The way to find out is to test what he says against Scripture. At present your understanding of Scripture is probably very limited so don't be afraid to put things into the "not sure yet" pile - don't feel you have to specifically agree or disagree with ideas, and don't feel you have to specifically accept or reject specific teachers. Sometimes it seems people are expected to either agree wholeheartedly with someone or give good reasons why they disagree. There's no reason why you have to take a stance at all if you're not sure, and it's perfectly possible to agree with some of what someone says while disagreeing with other parts. The primary exception to that is that if a teacher teaches something that appears to disagree with Scripture I would personally reject that teaching and anything else that builds upon it. If you were looking for lessons in mathematics and found a teacher who couldn't add up you wouldn't overlook their lack of basic skills and accept tuition from them on something more advanced.
As you get to know Scripture better you'll start to get a better idea of the message of Scripture. Be careful of teachers who will use a verse here and a verse there to support the case they are trying to make - read the verses people are using and read the context as well. The message of Scripture is one thing but by cherry-pickng a verse here and a verse there all sorts of silly theories can be apparently supported with Scripture.
For example if we take Job 22:28 and ignore the context we read "You will also declare a thing, And it will be established for you; So light will shine on your ways." This looks great, we can declare something and it will happen. Awesome stuff! The trouble is the context just doesn't support this viewpoint - if we read the chapter we see that these aren't the words of God at all - Job 22:1 says "Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered and said:". So the words about declaring something came from Eliphaz, not from God. So people who stand on Job 22:28 are expecting God to honour the words spoken by a mortal man. That alone is standing on shaky ground but it gets worse - roll forward to the end of the book of Job and we see in Job 42:7-8: And so it was, after the LORD had spoken these words to Job, that the LORD said to Eliphaz the Temanite, "My wrath is aroused against you and your two friends, for you have not spoken of Me what is right, as My servant Job has. (8) Now therefore, take for yourselves seven bulls and seven rams, go to My servant Job, and offer up for yourselves a burnt offering; and My servant Job shall pray for you. For I will accept him, lest I deal with you according to your folly; because you have not spoken of Me what is right, as My servant Job has." So not only are people who stand on Job 22:28 taking the verse out of context, they are apparently expecting God to honour the words spoken by a man who was subsequently rebuked by God for what he said.
It's very easy to get caught up in reading this author or that author, so much so that you spend lots of time reading about the Bible and reading man's opinion of what the Bible means, and little to no time actually reading the Bible itself.
As a very rough-and-ready guide I'd say be very careful of any teaching that denies the deity of Christ, any teaching that draws attention away from Christ, anything that requires blind faith in the teacher (if a teacher says you don't need to test what they preach, ask why they are afraid of being tested because anything that is true will withstand testing), and any teacher who suggests their word trumps Scripture.
Being faced with a list of some people saying Pastor Joe Blow is a great guy who preaches solidly from Scripture, and list of other people saying Pastor Joe Blow preaches some other gospel that is false and providing reasons they think he is a false teacher, it's easy to see why a new Christian like yourself would be confused. After all, Pastor Joe can't be simultaneously speaking truth and falsehood, so who is right?
The way to find out is to test what he says against Scripture. At present your understanding of Scripture is probably very limited so don't be afraid to put things into the "not sure yet" pile - don't feel you have to specifically agree or disagree with ideas, and don't feel you have to specifically accept or reject specific teachers. Sometimes it seems people are expected to either agree wholeheartedly with someone or give good reasons why they disagree. There's no reason why you have to take a stance at all if you're not sure, and it's perfectly possible to agree with some of what someone says while disagreeing with other parts. The primary exception to that is that if a teacher teaches something that appears to disagree with Scripture I would personally reject that teaching and anything else that builds upon it. If you were looking for lessons in mathematics and found a teacher who couldn't add up you wouldn't overlook their lack of basic skills and accept tuition from them on something more advanced.
As you get to know Scripture better you'll start to get a better idea of the message of Scripture. Be careful of teachers who will use a verse here and a verse there to support the case they are trying to make - read the verses people are using and read the context as well. The message of Scripture is one thing but by cherry-pickng a verse here and a verse there all sorts of silly theories can be apparently supported with Scripture.
For example if we take Job 22:28 and ignore the context we read "You will also declare a thing, And it will be established for you; So light will shine on your ways." This looks great, we can declare something and it will happen. Awesome stuff! The trouble is the context just doesn't support this viewpoint - if we read the chapter we see that these aren't the words of God at all - Job 22:1 says "Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered and said:". So the words about declaring something came from Eliphaz, not from God. So people who stand on Job 22:28 are expecting God to honour the words spoken by a mortal man. That alone is standing on shaky ground but it gets worse - roll forward to the end of the book of Job and we see in Job 42:7-8: And so it was, after the LORD had spoken these words to Job, that the LORD said to Eliphaz the Temanite, "My wrath is aroused against you and your two friends, for you have not spoken of Me what is right, as My servant Job has. (8) Now therefore, take for yourselves seven bulls and seven rams, go to My servant Job, and offer up for yourselves a burnt offering; and My servant Job shall pray for you. For I will accept him, lest I deal with you according to your folly; because you have not spoken of Me what is right, as My servant Job has." So not only are people who stand on Job 22:28 taking the verse out of context, they are apparently expecting God to honour the words spoken by a man who was subsequently rebuked by God for what he said.
It's very easy to get caught up in reading this author or that author, so much so that you spend lots of time reading about the Bible and reading man's opinion of what the Bible means, and little to no time actually reading the Bible itself.
As a very rough-and-ready guide I'd say be very careful of any teaching that denies the deity of Christ, any teaching that draws attention away from Christ, anything that requires blind faith in the teacher (if a teacher says you don't need to test what they preach, ask why they are afraid of being tested because anything that is true will withstand testing), and any teacher who suggests their word trumps Scripture.
Upvote
0