- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,006
- 52,622
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just as I thought.
Anyone can accuse the Scriptures of espousing geocentrism, can't they?
Don't worry -- we'll be glad to do our best to tell you what It says.
That's what we're here for.
More useful to whom? you?But it's more useful to discuss the people who used the Scriptures to espouse geoentricism.
Uh-huh ... so I notice.We already know what it says -- we can read.
God commanded the Sun to stop (Isaiah 40:22 & Job 26:7) This is only possible if the sun orbits the Earth. Otherwise God would have commanded the Earth to stop!Please show me geocentrism in the Bible, using verses that cannot be construed any other way, or semantics that is unique.
In other words, don't show me verses that use the same expressions as we use today -- like 'sunrise' or 'sunset'; but show me clear-cut geocentrism.
While you're at it, I would very much be interested in knowing which specific passage(s) convince you that geocentrism is taught in the Scriptures.
(Or am I going to have to take your point with a grain of salt?)
More useful to whom? you?
You want to discuss those who used science to commit atrocities first?
People [mis]used the Scriptures to justify the Crusades; and even today, you guys call us ... ironists for not hunting witches; so what makes you any better than those you criticize in the past?
What exactly is your point?
Don't you mean Joshua 10:12-13?God commanded the Sun to stop (Isaiah 40:22 & Job 26:7) This is only possible if the sun orbits the Earth. Otherwise God would have commanded the Earth to stop!
As we should; otherwise, your example at the end of your post would result.What puzzles me is that Bible literals choose what to keep literally and what not.
God did.Who gave them the right to choose what to keep and what to disregard when the scriptures are God's word and Jesus commanded us not to change an iota and that all scriptures must be upheld till the end of time.
This is why I'm glad you guys aren't in control of what goes on.If one declares that he adheres to a literal Bible then let him kill a disobedient child or be damned for disregarding the scriptures!
The Bible is literal.Of course there would not be a need for such things if the Bible was used as a spiritual guide rather than a literal text book!![]()
Then by all means, do it for those you think would understand -- like your contemporaries.As much fun as it would be to watch you tap dance and desperately change the subject, I don't believe for one second that you're capable of discussing people -- personal responsibility is all but unheard of among you religious types.
Geostationary is correct. It means that relative to the Earth the object stays stationary. Everything in the universe moves. Even our galaxy moves at speeds that defy the mind. Our sun moves.We speak today of a geostationary satellite being fixed and not moving, when in fact, it is moving at thousands of miles per hour.
Belk said:Go ahead AV. Deliberately miss the point again and try to make this about geocentrism.![]()
Just as I thought.
Anyone can accuse the Scriptures of espousing geocentrism, can't they?
The trick is backing it up.
What's even sadder though, is that you can't (or won't) tell me why you believe it.
Common sense is often wrong. And btw, you really mean: If the experts contradict my fallible interpretation of the bible then all you need is a huge ego to "know" the experts are wrong.If the "experts" contradict the bible then all you need is a little common sense to know the "experts" are wrong.
I guess the only ""experts"" that are never wrong, are the self-proclaimed bible ""experts."" Correct?The fact that the the previous generation of "experts" were refuted suggests they were never "experts" on the subject in the first place. They were simply wrong.
There is only one reality. You guys just don't like it.No. I simply reject your reality in favor of the reality the bible describes.
The Bible certainly infers geocentrism. You know all the reasons... Joshua, earth made first and the sun just a lamp, earth center of the universe, earth unmovable, etc., etc. The authors certainly were geocentrists. Most importantly, nothing in scripture infers heliocentrism.Just as I thought.
Anyone can accuse the Scriptures of espousing geocentrism, can't they?
The trick is backing it up.
What's even sadder though, is that you can't (or won't) tell me why you believe it.
That's too bad... because then you might actually understand the books you think so very highly of. Of course, for you guys its not about understanding the bible.. its about the easy way and the "feel good" way.Uh-huh ... so I notice.
And I'm thankful we don't interpret the Scriptures like you guys do.
Split Rock, just for your edification, we are to:And btw, you really mean: If the "experts" contradict my fallible interpretation of the bible then all you need is a huge ego to know the "experts" are wrong.
I guess the only ""experts"" that are never wrong, are the self-proclaimed bible ""experts."" Correct?
Nope -- It uses geocentric terminology, so as to maintain Its ease of understanding the passage and teachability (to little children).The Bible certainly infers geocentrism.
You interviewed them personally, did you?The authors certainly were geocentrists.
Well ain't that too bad?Most importantly, nothing in scripture infers heliocentrism.
Ya -- from behind bars.That's too bad... because then you might actually understand the books you think so very highly of.
Split Rock, just for your edification, we are to:
Romans 14:5 Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.
I'm not going to go around using the language of fallibility, while at the same time claiming persuasion, just to please you guys here.
Nope -- It uses geocentric terminology, so as to maintain Its ease of understanding the passage and teachability (to little children).
Beat you to it! (well... not reallyYou interviewed them personally, did you?
They wrote about things the way they understood them... not necessarily how they really were.For argument's sake though, let's say they were.
What about it?
I agree.Well ain't that too bad?
I agree again.. why then do you guys keep using it the wrong way???Using the Bible for a science manual is like using Bill Gate's diary for a computer manual.
Not sure what that is refering to.Ya -- from behind bars.