Unless all men are 100% god, that's a logical contradiction, I think
Only one immature bird fossil?
These are
only the non-avian dinosaurs with
evidence for feathers. Many more species are known in which feathers (or their correlates) are not preserved but which are otherwise nearly identical to creatures on the list.
Add to that numerous well-preserved birds* that lived alongside other dinosaurs. There's no similar Wikipedia list of them, but a fair few pop up among
these search results.
The funny thing? It's really hard to tell where "dinosaur" ends and "bird" begins. That's why things like
Archaeopteryx move back and forth around the origin of birds when people do phylogenetic analyses.
...'fraid it's a little more than "one immature bird fossil".
*"Birds" is a horribly ill-defined term when it comes to these early forms. I'm using it
very roughly in
this sense.
That was not what I asked. I asked you what defining feature of animals was missing from humans.
You know, like: are we multicellular? Do we move? Do we eat other living things?
That sort of thing. Can you find one that animals in general have, but we don't?
It's not that simple to shut me up, as you probably know. Nice try, though...
I don't see a connection. Is every animal with a unique feature no longer an animal?
