• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

"I'm not an expert, BUT......."

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
God has said nothing about evolution
No kidding.
If its a duck than it is a duck, despite your unreasonable interpretation of scripture.
It's not a duck. That's the point. It only looks like a duck and sounds like a duck, so it is reasonable to conclude it is a duck. But flawed reasoning nevertheless.
If your interpretation of scripture conflicts with our observations, then clearly it is your interpretation of scripture which is the problem!
Scientific theories are not observations. They are fallible human interpretations of observations. And the interpretations are often biased against the records of history.
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I've read it several times and I'm missing the part where it talks about a nested hierarchy. Could you clarify how this verse relates to nested hierarchies?
It doesn't. That's the point.

The verses describe the first modern human being made directly from the earth and all other modern humans descended from him. This contradicts your theory, therefore your theory can take a hike.
 
Upvote 0

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
No kidding.
It's not a duck. That's the point. It only looks like a duck and sounds like a duck, so it is reasonable to conclude it is a duck. But flawed reasoning nevertheless.
Scientific theories are not observations. They are fallible human interpretations of observations. And the interpretations are often biased against the records of history.

No. We ignore your fallible human interpretation of those observations

So, our interpretations of observations are fallible, but your interpretation of scripture is not?
 
Upvote 0

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
It doesn't. That's the point.

The verses describe the first modern human being made directly from the earth and all other modern humans descended from him. This contradicts your theory, therefore your theory can take a hike.

No, your flawed theology can take a hike. :p
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
[bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] that preacher is kick-boxing the crap out of those poor christians!!! Haha by far the best vid i've seen with that damn drowning pool song!
Making fun of us isn't going to cause us to go away, but it will cause you to go away.
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Actually, no. If I understand Genesis correctly, it is not mentioned wherefrom animals are made. Only when Adam is created, the substance is mentioned.
So let's settle this whole evolution argument by a compromise.

I'll accept the animals evolved if you accept that Adam/Man didn't. :)
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That is not to say we are spiritually animals
I am of the view that if we are not animals spiritually then we are not animals, period.

What is Man? Is he a body who has a spirit, or is he a spirit within a body? Or is he a combination of both?
 
Upvote 0

mzungu

INVICTUS
Dec 17, 2010
7,162
250
Earth!
✟32,475.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
It doesn't. That's the point.

The verses describe the first modern human being made directly from the earth and all other modern humans descended from him. This contradicts your theory, therefore your theory can take a hike.
Let me get this straight: If Adam and Eve were the only humans and they had 2 children (both boys) and one was murdered by his brother, thus leaving the father (Adam), the Mother (Eve) and the only surviving son (Cain). Then how on earth did all of humanity come from those 3? The only way this can happen is through incest!

You have no empirical evidence and your bronze age mythology does not constitute evidence especially as scientific evidence.

Believe what you want. After all it is your right; But do not insult our intelligence by insisting that creationism is above science!
 
Upvote 0
J

Jazer

Guest
Then how on earth did all of humanity come from those 3?
Perhaps you may want to read your Bible. For some reason people skip over all the geneologys. The Bible does not claim any more people then what is listed in the geneologys came from Adam and Eve. People read things into it that are not there. The decendants of Adam and Eve are the Hebrews, the Jewish people. This is their history book. All the rest were adopted into the family. We were grafted into the tree. We are not the Biological decendants of Abraham. Unless it is though a handmaid somewhere. But only the children of Abrahams wife Sarah count as the children of the promise. The Children that Abraham had with the other women fall under a different promise and a different covenant. Perhaps this is all to difficult for you to grasp the concept of right now. But perhaps someday you will understand. Perhaps someday Science will catchup with the Bible and they will be able to explain it to you. Or perhaps someday you will actually read the Bible rather than to fight against the God that created you. So you can perhaps come to a saving knowledge of the truth and come out of all your lies, deception and falsehoods. So you can walk in the light and not in darkness.
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,825
7,842
65
Massachusetts
✟392,190.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Perhaps you may want to read your Bible. For some reason people skip over all the geneologys. The Bible does not claim any more people then what is listed in the geneologys came from Adam and Eve.
"Adam named his wife Eve, because she would become the mother of all the living."
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,464
597
✟87,895.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Let me get this straight: If Adam and Eve were the only humans and they had 2 children (both boys) and one was murdered by his brother, thus leaving the father (Adam), the Mother (Eve) and the only surviving son (Cain). Then how on earth did all of humanity come from those 3? The only way this can happen is through incest!
Since when was incest forbidden?

If you and your sister were the only two people left on earth after a global catastrophe would you choose to procreate, or go extinct?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,825
7,842
65
Massachusetts
✟392,190.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Let me get this straight: If Adam and Eve were the only humans and they had 2 children (both boys) and one was murdered by his brother, thus leaving the father (Adam), the Mother (Eve) and the only surviving son (Cain). Then how on earth did all of humanity come from those 3? The only way this can happen is through incest!
Note that Adam and Eve had other children. (Still requires incest, just a different variety.)
 
Upvote 0