- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,999
- 52,622
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Gnomes, as in evasion tactic.Gnomes, as in gray or red??
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Gnomes, as in evasion tactic.Gnomes, as in gray or red??
YesAre you under the impression you scored some kind of a point?
Angels can be indistinguishable from humans -- yet they are not animals, are they?'Cause I don't see it.![]()
To add, Jesus was 100% God and 100% Man! He Grew in wisdom, hungered, sleept, and weeped... all attributes of man!
He forgave sins, he could be blesphemed, he created the world... all attributes of God! moreover John the Baptist testemoney in all the four gospels, is that Jesus is LORD as the prophet Isaiah said!
I thought I would make that clear bear!!
Well, I'm certainly glad science clears that up!P1: Animals are multi-cellular organisms.
P2: Angels are not multi-cellular organisms.
C: Therefore, angels cannot be considered as 'animals'.
If you cannot tell me if a gnome is an animal, then don't expect me to tell you if an angel is an animal.Gnomes, as in evasion tactic.
Show me one, and I'll tell you.Yes
Angels can be indistinguishable from humans -- yet they are not animals, are they?
Birds.
Not I.
I'm a member of the Kingdom of Heaven --
And I suspect Juve is too.
Hebrews 13:2 Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.Are they indistinguishable from humans?
You wouldn't tell me anyway -- you know better.If you cannot tell me if a gnome is an animal, then don't expect me to tell you if an angel is an animal.
Yup -- ain't that a shame?I can't stop be amazed by the wisdom of Solomon. He said nearly 3000 years ago that many would think that they are (the same as) animals. Probably not much could be done to those who are willingly to devolve themselves.
You wouldn't tell me anyway -- you know better.
I'd pwn you back to last Thursday --![]()
Ha ha ha. You kids yourself.
Millions of dinosaur fossils, but only one immature (?) bird fossil?
I think even you would have big problem to believe that.
I would... if all the evidence consisted of one immature bird fossil....
Which defining property of animals do you think you lack?
And what's so shameful about being an animal, anyway?
Surprisingly
I'm pretty sure I've given it already, since I pull it out all the time. Nevertheless, here it is again. (Also, I found this while googling up that paper. Just one reason not everyone goes multicellular)
Why?
If evolution can randomly add or remove complexity with equal chance, and it starts from low complexity, I'm pretty sure you still get an overall trend of increasing complexity in the long term simply because of your starting point. Wait, I'll try to simulate this...