newhopeinHim
Active Member
I already haveThis being a discussion and debate forum pertaining to the Physical and Life Sciences, I'm just wondering; do you have any contributions pertaining that you wish to make?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I already haveThis being a discussion and debate forum pertaining to the Physical and Life Sciences, I'm just wondering; do you have any contributions pertaining that you wish to make?
No, you'd be an astrophysicist if you earned a Ph.D. in astrophysics and currently work in a related field.
Smart AlecOk, here goes.
God, I sincerely ask you to show me who you say you are!
*how long should I wait for a reply?
Roman Tacitus writes about Jesus as Christus, Christ!
Roman Tacitus wrote about Jesus as Christus, The Christ!Jesus did not have the surname of "Christ". Historians may have written about a man named "Jesus". They did not write about "Jesus Christ".
"However, Richard Carrier has suggested that the line mentioning Christ by name is a Christian interpolation."Roman Tacitus writes about Jesus as Christus, Christ!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus_on_Christ
uh, look up the word (sincerely) I'm almost positive you were NOT sincere... other wise you would have already been saved.This would suggest that your suggestion was hyperbolic fluff?
You asked me to sincerely ask, and I did.
LOL!And you'd be an evolutionist if you earned a Ph.D and worked in the field of evolutionary biology.
Apparently you missed the boat on that convo.
your not saved... that's obviousYep, sincere. I guess that would mean I'm "saved?"
Now what?
This is correct. I just finished Carrier's scholarly tome (over 700 pages) - "On The Historicity Of Jesus" - and based on his research, at this point in time, Carrier doesn't believe that there was a literal, historical, Jesus, but that Jesus fits that category of a classic Rank-Raglan mythotype dying and rising deity. In fact, the Jesus mythotpe scored just as high and in most cases higher than other known mythotypes."However, Richard Carrier has suggested that the line mentioning Christ by name is a Christian interpolation."
Got anything else?
WRONG!This is correct. I just finished Carrier's scholarly tome (over 700 pages) - "On The Historicity Of Jesus" - and based on his research, at this point in time, Carrier doesn't believe that there was a literal, historical, Jesus, but that Jesus fits that category of a classic Rank-Raglan mythotype dying and rising deity. In fact, the Jesus mythotpe scored just as high and in most cases higher than other known mythotypes.
As for Tacitus, he was neither a contemporary, and you are correct in that the "christus" reference is indeed a later added interpolation.