• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Ignoring The Evidence : Why Are You Not An Evolutionist?

Crowns&Laurels

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2015
2,769
751
✟6,832.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
No, you'd be an astrophysicist if you earned a Ph.D. in astrophysics and currently work in a related field.

And you'd be an evolutionist if you earned a Ph.D and worked in the field of evolutionary biology.

Apparently you missed the boat on that convo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newhopeinHim
Upvote 0

UCDavis

Active Member
Sep 24, 2015
107
23
Alameda, California
✟25,842.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
  • Like
Reactions: newhopeinHim
Upvote 0

Davian

fallible
May 30, 2011
14,100
1,181
West Coast of Canada
✟46,103.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
  • Like
Reactions: crjmurray
Upvote 0

newhopeinHim

Active Member
Nov 2, 2015
253
86
50
✟858.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
This would suggest that your suggestion was hyperbolic fluff?

You asked me to sincerely ask, and I did.
uh, look up the word (sincerely) I'm almost positive you were NOT sincere... other wise you would have already been saved.
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
"However, Richard Carrier has suggested that the line mentioning Christ by name is a Christian interpolation."

Got anything else?
This is correct. I just finished Carrier's scholarly tome (over 700 pages) - "On The Historicity Of Jesus" - and based on his research, at this point in time, Carrier doesn't believe that there was a literal, historical, Jesus, but that Jesus fits that category of a classic Rank-Raglan mythotype dying and rising deity. In fact, the Jesus mythotpe scored just as high and in most cases higher than other known mythotypes.

As for Tacitus, he was neither a contemporary, and you are correct in that the "christus" reference is indeed a later added interpolation.
 
Upvote 0

newhopeinHim

Active Member
Nov 2, 2015
253
86
50
✟858.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
God will judge you for making fun of Him, you already live a miserable life
This is correct. I just finished Carrier's scholarly tome (over 700 pages) - "On The Historicity Of Jesus" - and based on his research, at this point in time, Carrier doesn't believe that there was a literal, historical, Jesus, but that Jesus fits that category of a classic Rank-Raglan mythotype dying and rising deity. In fact, the Jesus mythotpe scored just as high and in most cases higher than other known mythotypes.

As for Tacitus, he was neither a contemporary, and you are correct in that the "christus" reference is indeed a later added interpolation.
WRONG!:)
 
Upvote 0