We are free to disagree with Onieu's vision, but so far he, along with I think two others, has given the most on-topic response, vis-a-vis offering his intimations of a comprehensive social concept/ideal (whether set in millennial or non/pre-millennial terms).
Such Spenglerian inquiries are certainly not for everyone. Some lead, some follow without thinking about where it's heading. Some let the priest do all the thinking. Some have an inner, wordless "knowing" whereby their inspiration leads them without need for intellectual grasp of, or ability to put into words (yet) what it's all about - and we just have to respect that.
Such Spenglerian inquiries are certainly not for everyone. Some lead, some follow without thinking about where it's heading. Some let the priest do all the thinking. Some have an inner, wordless "knowing" whereby their inspiration leads them without need for intellectual grasp of, or ability to put into words (yet) what it's all about - and we just have to respect that.
Last edited:
Upvote
0