Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Instead he tries to pretend he has disproven all of science based on something he doesn't even know. Which is the better alternative?
As I have said before, God created the science that this universe runs on.
I don't really disagree with this, but how fast the FDA pushes a drug through the system doesn't really have anything to do with the science involved. It's more of a political issue.
.*cough* Example, he said there were windows in the sky in Noahs time. *cough*
You never even tried! The best you could come up with was some "angel in the alley" story!
Yep, I'd agree that you have a problem understanding what a singularoity is. No argument there, congrats on admiting it.
Once again is this a cure? You are so smart you must know that if your body is alkaline you cannot get cancer. You might want to check this out.
next...haha
lol horsemen you sound like a puppet. Do you know what heparin is used for medically? there was several studies done, vit e is way more effective as a blood thinner with no side effects.
You should study more before you post on these things. you may want to check out chelation therapy.
As I recall, that was just an example that you or someone had asked for. An example from the magazine I gave you (Guidepost).
There are about four different types of singularities. Miracles is one of them. I didn't understand the mathematical singularity, but it's clear to me some don't understand the miracle one, either.
I INITIALLY asked you for an example of scientifically observable theistic intervention, and you said "guidepost magazine". When I asked for an example from Guidepost magazine, you came up with the Angel in the Alley story. Maybe I wasn't being clear, so I will try again.
I'm still waiting for any non biblical evidence of theistic intervention. I'd accept any at all.You want what?
Give me an example of "non-biblical evidence of theistic intervention".
Guidepost Magazine is full of examples.
Could you please, if you have one, provide me with an example of biological theistic intervention that could be observable in a biology classroom.
Because a 'first look' was taken and didn't seem to give harmful effects.Right --- blame it on the politicians.
Where do these politicians get the idea that these drugs are okay to market in the first place?
Why does someone have to die of Vioxx first, before someone takes a second look?
Merck does not intend to address specific cases or comment about ongoing litigation on this site. As a Company, we continue to believe that we acted responsibly from researching VIOXX prior to approval in studies involving almost 10,000 patients to monitoring the medicine while it was on the market to voluntarily withdrawing the medicine when we did. We based our decisions on the data from well-controlled clinical trials.
So after people used it for 18 months, the medicin began to give it's side-effects.On Sept. 30, 2004, Merck announced a voluntary worldwide withdrawal of VIOXX. The companys decision was based on new, three-year data from a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, the APPROVe (Adenomatous Polyp Prevention on VIOXX) trial.
In the APPROVe study, there was an increased relative risk for confirmed cardiovascular events, such as heart attack and stroke, beginning after 18 months of treatment in the patients taking VIOXX compared with those taking placebo. The results for the first 18 months of the APPROVe study did not show an increased risk of confirmed cardiovascular events on VIOXX and, in this respect, were similar to the results of two placebo-controlled studies described in the most recent U.S. labeling for VIOXX.
Well, we've gone from "non-Biblical evidence of theistic intervention" to "an example of biological theistic intervention that could be observable in a biology classroom".
And there's no way I'm going to hunt through Guidepost Magazine and post one of their stories, only to have you change the question on me.
Not hardly --- if you've read enough of my posts, you'll see that I actually hold science in high esteem.
As I have said before, God created the science that this universe runs on.
.
[bible]Genesis 7:11[/bible]
It is a methoid to investigate the natural laws that God created.
We did animal testing on Vioxx --> seemed safe
The above steps are taken in all approved medicins.
If you look at Merck's website:
...based on new, three-year data from a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial...
Oh come ON... given that the thread is about biology and the teaching thereof, I think theistic intervention APLICABLE to BIOLOGY was pretty well implied.
Thats what he meant to say. See humans created science as a means of investigation, God didnt, and AV certianly doesnt hold science in high regard. He is specifically against science. If he doenst like the scientific method, he is against science. Its that simple.
I am against science, only in the areas where it disagrees with Scripture; but you knew that from my signature, right, Edx?
The point is that God created us with the ability to use science to investigate His Creation. If you deny God, then you deny true science. You can not have science without God being a part of it. Because science investigates God's Creation.Thats what he meant to say yes. Humans created science as a means of investigation
The point is that God created us with the ability to use science to investigate His Creation. If you deny God, then you deny true science. You can not have science without God being a part of it. Because science investigates God's Creation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?