BobRyan said:
↑
The Ten Commandments are included in the LAW of God - included in the LAW of Jer 31:31-33 "
This is the NEW Covenant ...I will write My LAWs on their heart and on their mind" . Jeremiah knew of that Law - so also did his readers.
In actual Bible study there is eisegesis "just making up whatever story you like" and there is "exegesis" looking at the details in the text and the intent of the author - for his readers.
Try quoting "you" less - and looking at the Bible more.
In this case the question of exegesis was mentioned - which is how Jeremiah and his readers would have understood the term "My LAW". would they imagine to themselves that the LAW that God spoke on Sinai and wrote on stone and "Added no more" according to scripture -- was "excluded"?? if so you have not come up with the creative "story" for how to imagine such a thing. So you merely "quote you".
Your argument that they would take Lev 19:18 "
Love your neighbor as yourself" and Deut 6:5 "
Love God with all your heart" as Laws to be used to delete God's spoken Word in Ex 20 where it then says in Deut 5 "And He added no more" -- is pure fiction. So you merely 'quote you'.
And we both know it.
Most impressively - so also do your own pro-sunday scholars know it. They know that the Ten Commandments were not deleted by Lev 19:18 or Deut 6:5 in either the OT or the NT.
Nor is there a NT text saying 'these two laws delete the OT, delete scripture, delete the commandments of God.."
Eph 6:2 the text you keep religiously avoiding "
Honor your father and Mother - which is the FIRST commandment with a promise" -- FIRST commandment WHERE??/ in Lev 19:18???? No!! how about in Deut 6:5??/ No !!
Incredibly obvious.
All of us can see it.
And you keep ignoring this detail while "quoting you" to come up with a story that is pleasing to some - though not the Bible??
hint: Even your own pro-sunday scholars know enough not to do such things.
(Instead of opposing the teaching of Christ in Mark 7:6-13 -- try a few days of embracing it)
Hello Bob.
Sorry for the delay, I had a few other matters to attend to. Sometime I cannot respond the same day.
In actual Bible study there is eisegesis "just making up whatever story you like" and there is "exegesis"
looking at the details in the text and the intent of the author - for his readers.
Nice comment Bob, I don't advocate creative writing when discussing the scripture either. Exegesis
raises one of the most important considerations when reading any text. Who is the intended audience?
Jew or Gentile, if you ignore the audience that the letter was written to, then your reading of the
scripture will be erroneous.
In this case the question of exegesis was mentioned - which is how Jeremiah and his readers would
have understood the term "My LAW"...Your argument that they would take Lev 19:18 "Love your neighbor
as yourself" and Deut 6:5 "Love God with all your heart" as Laws to be used to delete God's spoken Word
in Ex 20 where it then says in Deut 5 "And He added no more" -- is pure fiction.
We cannot know whether Jeremiah understood what he wrote. We cannot assume that he did,
the text is silent about this point Bob.
Actually that is not what I am saying Bob, I have never said to delete any of these commandments.
I could never be accused of saying 'love your neighbor as yourself' (Deut 6:5) either, that is the law.
John 13
34
A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, even as I have loved you.
You have the NEW commandment right there Bob, this is not an old commandment and I will explain why.
The NEW commandment tells us to love others as Jesus loved us, not as we love ourselves. Anyone who
quotes the Leviticus commandment to love your neighbor, misunderstands the NEW Commandment.
There is an astronomical difference between the love of Christ for us and self love, never equate these.
I repeat Bob, I never said to delete any commandments, I have said that we are under a New Covenant.
You need to admit that God does indeed change, God annulled hundreds of laws, i.e., commandments.
You do not need to be circumcised and there is no doubt that circumcision was a very important commandment.
The law is established as a guideline for understanding what sin is, we most certainly do not ignore the law.
But we are not under the law, otherwise, we would be circumcised and still in fact be under the whole law.
Most impressively - so also do your own pro-sunday scholars know it. They know that the Ten Commandments
were not deleted by Lev 19:18 or Deut 6:5 in either the OT or the NT.
I am not a follower of the Reformation movement, nor am I 'pro-sunday' advocate. I am not even a protestant Bob.
Nor is there a NT text saying 'these two laws delete the OT, delete scripture, delete the commandments of God.."
Once again I have never said to delete any text, if we deleted the commandments, then we would fail to
understand that we must be circumcised in order to be under the law.
Eph 6:2 the text you keep religiously avoiding "Honor your father and Mother - which is the
FIRST commandment with a promise" -- FIRST commandment WHERE??/ in Lev 19:18???? No!!
how about in Deut 6:5??/ No !!
I fully endorse this commandment, though I would exceed this commandment and suggest you love your parents.
You cannot claim to just honor your parents and love everyone else. Love your parents Bob.
Yes Bob, it is incredible and obvious that circumcision is now void, you cannot be under the law without circumcision.
You fully agree then that God has annulled the commandment concerning circumcision.
I disagree Bob, no one reads the text and understands the text, everyone massages the text and chooses
certain verses to support their theology. A never ending tradition of distorting the text, Paul warned us that
this would happen. Bob, do not delete the commandment to be circumcised.
And you keep ignoring this detail while "quoting you" to come up with a story that is pleasing to some -
though not the Bible??
You cannot be under the law because you are not circumcised, Bob, you have deleted the commandment
to be circumcised. Do you believe that you have the authority to delete this commandment, Bob?
hint: Even your own pro-sunday scholars know enough not to do such things.
I do not support Reformation theology or any other tradition of men.
(Instead of opposing the teaching of Christ in Mark 7:6-13 -- try a few days of embracing it)
I am not circumcised Bob,hence, I cannot be under the law.