2) The times of day could be symbols of eons of work. Or they could have been gods way of explaining the week time system to people.
So there was plantllife on the earth for EONS without the sun on the fourth day......
hmmmm
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
2) The times of day could be symbols of eons of work. Or they could have been gods way of explaining the week time system to people.
You are right. Plants couldn't have existed for eons before the sun. They couldn't have existed for a day before the sun either. The answer is simple. Genesis 1 is a creation myth. There was no life of any kind in the solar system before the sun which was around for a billion years or so before life of any kind either appeared, arrived or was created on earth. The story of creation was framed in terms that the people it was intended to instruct could understand.jobob said:So there was plantllife on the earth for EONS without the sun on the fourth day......
hmmmm
Not a very convincing arguement to me.....
Let us suppose that in explaining the words, "And God said, 'Let there be light,' and light was made," one man thinks that it was material light that was made, and another that it was spiritual. As to the actual existence of spiritual light in a spiritual creature, our faith leaves no doubt; as to the existence of material light, celestial or supercelestial, even existing before the heavens, a light which could have been followed by night, there will be nothing in such a supposition contrary to the faith until unerring truth gives the lie to it. And if that should happen, this teaching was never in Holy Scripture but was an opinion proposed by man in his ignorance.
St. Augustine, 401 AD
Hmm. The last time I looked a circle was a 2 dimensional object, i.e. flat.jobob said:It doesnt........these folks just want to play on the word used... 'circle' instead of 'ball'.....
Not a very convincing arguement to me.....
MSBS said:[/font]
As one of the early chruch fathers, and a moving force behind the councils that decided which books would be included in the bible, would you think that you should pay attention to Augustine's argument?
and the last time I looked a circle was ''round''Frumious Bandersnatch said:Hmm. The last time I looked a circle was a 2 dimensional object, i.e. flat.
How about Psalms 136:6?
To him that stretched out the earth above the waters: for his mercy endureth for ever.
How is a sphere stretched out above the waters? How is the earth stretched out above waters?
the frumious Bandersnatch
Yes the Hebrews thougth the earth was shaped like a disk. You know round and flat.jobob said:and the last time I looked a circle was ''round''
seems like a simple enough concept...
Frumious Bandersnatch said:Hmm. The last time I looked a circle was a 2 dimensional object, i.e. flat.
How about Psalms 136:6?
To him that stretched out the earth above the waters: for his mercy endureth for ever.
How is a sphere stretched out above the waters? How is the earth stretched out above waters?
the frumious Bandersnatch
Skillz151 said:I don't think they had the word 'sphere' back in those times. Couldn't round suffice?
And the book of Psalms is not meant to be taken literally, Psalms is full of poetic literature.
What about Job Job 26 : 7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing. That's pretty impressive....
Arikay said:I would think "ball like object" would work much better than "circle" yet they did choose to use circle instead of ball. The idea that circle = round, round = sphere thus circle = sphere is a bit flawed dont you think? Especially when you start to look up words.
Not that impressive, the hebrew version of the earth had the flat disk of the earth not resting on anything. (oh, except when it was resting on pillars)
You left out the rest of the verse.Skillz151 said:I like you Arikay.... your a cool dude. Let's take a look:
Isaiah 40 : 22 It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth,
Now let's try ball like object... It is he that sitteth upon the ball like object of the earth.Circle works better.....
But isn't God everywhere? How does His light create morning and evening? If God was giving off a great light then why don't we? After all it says he created man in his image. Or is this just one more in a long list of passages in the "literally" true Bible that is not really meant to be taken literally after all and must be interpreted?And I have an idea... when God created the Earth ... HE may of been the light himself.
Arikay said:Maybe you need a better dictionary.![]()
Frumious Bandersnatch said:Yes the Hebrews thougth the earth was shaped like a disk. You know round and flat.![]()
the frumious Bandersnatch
I gave the REV. passage where this light situation can easily be shown as not an issue at allSkillz151 said:And I have an idea... when God created the Earth ... HE may of been the light himself.
2 Thessalonians 2 : 8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
I know this passage has nothing to do with the creation, but it does seem to imply that when God is present He is Bright. Something to think about.
Skillz151 said:I like you Arikay.... your a cool dude. Let's take a look:
Isaiah 40 : 22 It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth,
Now let's try ball like object... It is he that sitteth upon the ball like object of the earth.Circle works better.....
jobob said:just like we might do the very same today in english..
Im going to choose the word that gets the point across and is most gramatically correct.
I dont imagine these folks would have permitted Moses or anyone that luxury...