Warden_of_the_Storm
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2015
- 15,201
- 7,478
- 31
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes ... and I'd rather not say.
Google doesn't seem to want to mention anything about it.
If I died for that ... refusing to recant ... would you change your mind?Then by the simple logic of deduction: you're lying.
If I died for that ... refusing to recant ... would you change your mind?
(Please answer this.)
Fair enough.Nope,
Fair enough.
I'll take your accusation with a modicum of sodium then.
No.Do you have evidence to back up your claim that "academia used to teach that an embryo went through three stages in the womb: first negroid, then mongoloid, then caucasoid"?
I couldn't find anything either, but I wouldn't be surprised if there had been somebody making that claim once upon a time. Quite a bit of that kind of thing went on in the 19th century as white n. European Evangelicals tried to twist new sciences to support their racial biases. The progression of negroid, mongoloid, caucasoid can be found readily enough.
No.
So I thought I'd ask around.
You know ... investigate before I communicate.
Have you ever heard that before?
Do you think I should start a thread on it?
I somehow doubt that European Evangelicals would pluto "child in the womb" to "embryo;" but considering the Antichrist is going to come from that direction, I guess anything is possible.I couldn't find anything either, but I wouldn't be surprised if there had been somebody making that claim once upon a time. Quite a bit of that kind of thing went on in the 19th century as white n. European Evangelicals tried to twist new sciences to support their racial biases. The progression of negroid, mongoloid, caucasoid can be found readily enough, nothing so far about fetal development.
Number One, Warden, I already said I didn't have any evidence.I've certainly never heard of it. But instead of starting a new thread on it, how about you just show us evidence for your claim or just outright admit that you have none and that you made it up on the spot.
Number One, Warden, I already said I didn't have any evidence.
And Number Two, of the Storm, I said I had a source ... so no, I did not make it up.
Start that storm, so you can play warden.
I beg your pardon. I forgot for a moment that all those terms were coined by evolutionists to justify abortion, which they also invented.I somehow doubt that European Evangelicals would pluto "child in the womb" to "embryo;" but considering the Antichrist is going to come from that direction, I guess anything is possible.
I noticed you plutoed it further to "fetal development."
It wasn't "academia" who were trying to justify colonialism and the slave trade.You also plutoed "academia" to "white n. European Evangelicals" ... but par for the course, I guess.
There aren't many non-Christian theists on here, so all you'd be doing is wasting your time preaching to the choir if you don't care to debate with atheists.Thanks for the explanation. We obviously are miles apart when it comes to goals. I don't expect atheists to believe or understand a lot of things, especially when it comes to God and things of a spiritual nature (1 Corinthians 2:14). I keep in mind that more than just atheists are reading such threads as these.
No.Secondly: why don't you present that source then? Give us the evidence for your claim, like you have been asked to do several times already. Please?
Unless your source is a Nazi, madman, etc., I can't imagine why you wouldn't want to share it.Yes ... and I'd rather not say.
Google doesn't seem to want to mention anything about it.
I suspect he lumps all non-YEC theists in with the atheists anyway.There aren't many non-Christian theists on here, so all you'd be doing is wasting your time preaching to the choir if you don't care to debate with atheists.
What does it matter what my source is?Unless your source is a Nazi, madman, etc., I can't imagine why you wouldn't want to share it.
What does it matter what my source is?
It's either true or false.
And I'm just asking ... for crying out loud.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?