Subduction Zone
Regular Member
And there you go admitting that that is what you used. Your views are an example of overliteralism.The only Flat Earth heuristic I can see is an heuristic that accepts overliteralism.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And there you go admitting that that is what you used. Your views are an example of overliteralism.The only Flat Earth heuristic I can see is an heuristic that accepts overliteralism.
It is probably true that she made it up. That is what the preponderance of evidence indicates.Probably? or possibly?
Wikipedia uses "possibly."
SOURCE
According to Wikipedia:
So it is Darwin's children that started the rumor that it didn't happen.
Choose whom you care to believe, and let me do the same.
I gave you a specific reason why I want to believe what I believe.
Are you willing to do the same?
What evidence specifically?It is probably true that she made it up. That is what the preponderance of evidence indicates.
The Bible would not qualify as evidence in this case. And especially not those verses. They have nothing to do with evolution.What evidence specifically?
This kind?
Luke 1:1 Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a declaration of those things which are most surely believed among us,
2 Even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word;
It is probably true that she made it up. That is what the preponderance of evidence indicates.
Frankly, I wouldn't be shocked if Darwin had rev rerted to his comforting prior beliefs on his deathbed, but this story appears to have been 5th 3gress fabricated.
We'll see if he (or anyone) has any specific evidence that supports his claim.The Bible would not qualify as evidence in this case. And especially not those verses. They have nothing to do with evolution.
As they say during math exams:Badly injured soldiers often regress and call for their mothers.
This " Darwin regressed" thing is such a limp straw to compulsively clutch.
Only shows they have nothing.
Your own desperation to believe this story is an example of evidence for it being false. You already owned up to your ulterior motives, and since Darwin's work has been confirmed a change of mind on his deathbed would not change the fact that you and I and every other human is an ape at all. This hatred of reality by creationists for no good reason tells us that they would see this example of Lying for Jesus as a good thing.We'll see if he (or anyone) has any specific evidence that supports his claim.
Oh my! Still desperately clutching.As they say during math exams:
Show your work please.
If it was such a "limp straw," I have a feeling Wikipedia, who has been advertising for monetary support for months, would say it is "possibly true."
Jesus wept over the lost.Your own desperation to believe this story is an example of evidence for it being false.
You bet I'm desperate.Oh my! Still desperately clutching.
I love the smell of desperation in the morning.
As they say during math exams:
Show your work please.
If it was such a "limp straw," I have a feeling Wikipedia, who has been advertising for monetary support for months, would say it is "possibly true."
So no evidence at all. Just misunderstanding at best on your part.Jesus wept over the lost.
And He told us that people like Darwin (and myself at one time) are fields that are "white already to harvest."
So you bet.
I'm desperate to believe this story.
For Darwin's sake.
And that's my reasoning for my desperation.
Now ... are you willing to show me your reasoning for your belief?
I am just as "saved" as you are.You bet I'm desperate.
Someone was desperate enough to come to our house and give us the Gospel.
And I'd venture to say you have some loved ones desperately praying for your salvation as well.
1: It is a straw. To mix metaphors any straw in a storm will do.Two questions:
1: Why does Wikipedia needing monetary support have anything to do with the very real possibility that the Lady Hope story could be false?
And 2: Why does it matter so much to you that the Lady Hope story be true? Does Darwin being a Christian on his death bed really a hill you feel the need to die on?
No, that is not evidence of what Darwin did or didn't do. I meant the evidence previously linked.What evidence specifically?
This kind?
Luke 1:1 Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a declaration of those things which are most surely believed among us,
2 Even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word;
1. I don't consider things that Wikipedia say are "possibly true" as "limp straws."Two questions:
1: Why does Wikipedia needing monetary support have anything to do with the very real possibility that the Lady Hope story could be false?
And 2: Why does it matter so much to you that the Lady Hope story be true? Does Darwin being a Christian on his death bed really a hill you feel the need to die on?
The Wiki article gives the clear evidence against it.
Your faith preference says otherwise.I am just as "saved" as you are.
1. I don't consider things that Wikipedia say are "possibly true" as "limp straws."
2. I've already explained that in detail. Do you want Scripture references? I'll be glad to supply them.