Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I know, at Galileo's time heliocentrism was "atheistic".Eh, maybe I overstated when I said offensive. One, it is irritating for someone to assume that you're an atheist just because you have a firm grasp on basic scientific knowledge. Two, it just shows how ignorant a person is when they make a comment about how deep time or evolution is somehow inherently atheistic.
I couldn't disagree more.If their beliefs were correct they would find support through scientific channels.
Well, if man can make god in their image, what's to stop them from telling him what he couldn't do?I know, at Galileo's time heliocentrism was "atheistic".
Science cannot prove that God exists. It can "prove" that certain versions of God do not exist. I find it rather amazing that creationists think that they can tell their God how he had to make the world.
That is because you know that if you follow reasonable channels you will lose. That refutes anyone that claims that you have not learned anything here.I couldn't disagree more.
It is rather amazing that the die hard creationists can't see that their god is exactly the god that they want. In other word man was not created in the image of god, it is the other way around.Well, if man can make god in their image, what's to stop them from telling him what he couldn't do?
Their meaning possessive.What do you mean "their" history? Wasn't Noah and family the only ones to experience the flood and live to tell about it?
You should check out some of the countless other creation myths from civilizations around the world. Genesis is actually pretty boring and simplistic compared to some of them, and it's impossible for all of them to be true.
Their meaning possessive.
If they have a common ancestry then they must have a common history
If you don't believe the beginning of Genesis, I would ask, do you believe ANY of the Bible? if so, how do you chose which bits to believe and which bits not to?If the beginnings of Genesis aren't literally true, then what way are they true?
God Bless!
They were true to the stories Bronze Age men told to each other around the camp fire at night. And that's it.If the beginnings of Genesis aren't literally true, then what way are they true?
God Bless!
No it fits the beliefs of Bronze Age Men. And up until The Elizabethan period.No, it is only at odds with your beliefs.
It's a thing of faith really. Jesus said that not one Jot (stop) or tittle (daguesh) would pass away until all be fulfilled. I believe that with all my heart. It's by faith that we know that God made the heavens and the earth. We accept science but faith in what God has said in His word overrules the theories that people come up with out of their heads. Evolution etc. simply remains a theory but what God says in His word remains the constant reality. All will know that one day.If you don't believe the beginning of Genesis, I would ask, do you believe ANY of the Bible? if so, how do you chose which bits to believe and which bits not to?
Common sense works for me.If you don't believe the beginning of Genesis, I would ask, do you believe ANY of the Bible? if so, how do you chose which bits to believe and which bits not to?
He also said people living in his time would see a lot that never happened.It's a thing of faith really. Jesus said that not one Jot (stop) or tittle (daguesh) would pass away until all be fulfilled. I believe that with all my heart. It's by faith that we know that God made the heavens and the earth. We accept science but faith in what God has said in His word overrules the theories that people come up with out of their heads. Evolution etc. simply remains a theory but what God says in His word remains the constant reality. All will know that one day.
I understand that Moses wrote the first few books of the Bible. I guess that would include Genesis. Moses was not a scientific man who was inspired by God. If God included all the details about how He created the earth and the stars, the Bible would have been a science book. The population at the time it was written would not have been interested. It would have been 100 volumes larger than it is. God's message would not have been conveyed.If the beginnings of Genesis aren't literally true, then what way are they true?
God Bless!
Fourty eight(48.7%) percent of all statistics are made up. Evolution and creation are the same. "David's Gifts" explains.No, it is at odds with the evidence. That is why well over 90% of all scientists accept evolution. When it comes to people that understand that topic the best it is over 99% and approaching or even passing 99.9%. To reject the theory of evolution one must eventually rejects all science.
No, it is at odds with the evidence. That is why well over 90% of all scientists accept evolution. When it comes to people that understand that topic the best it is over 99% and approaching or even passing 99.9%. To reject the theory of evolution one must eventually rejects all science.
I think you'll find that the Genesis account is literally true.If the beginnings of Genesis aren't literally true, then what way are they true?
how is rejecting evolution at odds with all science?! for the last 5000 years of recorded and documented history i am still waiting for the slightest evidence that an ape or any animal for that matter is evolving into something else.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?