- Oct 16, 2015
- 15,038
- 7,403
- 31
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
After going through the many, many, many pages of @pitabread's thread: Creationists: Explain your understanding of microevolution and macroevolution, and seeing the comments from a certain poster on this forum about micro and macroevolution, I do have to ask this question to the people who say that macroevolution is false or incorrect or just wrong, while microevolution is scientifically correct: what replaces macroevolution if it is wrong?
You can't just say 'creationism' or Creation because they're unscientific and incorrect too, so what replaces macroevolution?
You can't just say 'creationism' or Creation because they're unscientific and incorrect too, so what replaces macroevolution?